Jump to content

Maestrobjwa

Members
  • Posts

    10,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Maestrobjwa

  1. I ain't used to seeing all these Baltimore jacks on the clown maps, lolol That was crazy!
  2. And yet that helped the CCB! Look What an inverse relationship
  3. Ah so there IS an inverse relationship? Lol (somewhat, at least?)
  4. Had that in the back of my brain as I was typing it...shoot. So we gonna need the CCB in order to achieve the recently elusive 5" warning level criteria? Oof
  5. Well, in this case, at least we have the WAA...as long as nothing negative happens with that, many of us get out of this with warning criteria, hopefully. As much as we'd love to have double digits, if we gotta fail with the CCB, 6-8" isn't a bad consolation prize!
  6. I think part of it is because this whole setup and the various scenarios between the WAA and the CCB is kinda confusing (I mean it is for me, at least), so it's a little hard to know where your yard is at outside of the snowfall maps themselves.
  7. Okay, I understand that...but what I'm saying is, does a weaker WAA mean an earlier coastal? Or are they not connected like that?
  8. Alright I'm confused here...we're seeing more favorable trends with the coastal/CCB, right? Now, is there some kind of inverse relationship with the WAA for areas like yours? (Apologies...just trying to visualize the scenarios here)
  9. So...are you saying that we can benefit from even more relaxation of that vort over NE? So in a way it's like the opposite...suppression issues show up as "north" and not south? In other words, a further relaxation of that vort would produce a more of a "south"--in a good way--solution? *head spinning*
  10. I too was wondering about your well being--but as long as you were okay, I totally respected whatever your reasons for not being on here. Thanks for your post of explanation--I think your reasoning is something we all need to keep in mind with this hobby: taking inventory of just how much time we are putting into this vs real life!
  11. We were just worrying about suppression 12 hrs ago...lol Like psu said, there is definitely a limit to how far north things get. That confluence is definitely there...but just weak enough to help, hopefully.
  12. That's what I'm saying, lol Is it really worth parsing (pr panicking over) the details of it right now?
  13. BOB!!! Good to see ya sir!! I knew it!! I said the other day that you may have been waiting for a legit threat to be on the doorstep before you popped back in...and here you are!! Lol Welcome back!!
  14. Question: Why are ensembles no longer useful once we get this close to an event?
  15. Sounds like they're treating this in two parts (which it basically is)
  16. To help set the stage...the Winter Wind Etude by Chopin!
  17. I've always thought of this in two parts: WAA snowfall more certain, coastal a wild card. The only big bust scenario is to get nothing from either...and hopefully that is less likely.
  18. I guess he meant WHY? Lol I would like to know as well
  19. Oooof!!! That is maddening...one tiny feature with huge impacts either way! One aspect of tracking snow that will drive ya to drink if you're a drinker (thankfully I'm not, lol). Little tiny thing is like rolling the dice...the chaos element of this hobby that can't be seen until closer in. I certainly hope it can break in our favor this time!
  20. So I'm wondering how long it'll be before we know what happens with that feature? Maybe not till gametime? Lol
×
×
  • Create New...