Jump to content

Maestrobjwa

Members
  • Posts

    11,179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Maestrobjwa

  1. Yeah you just worry about more ticks south as we go along
  2. Yeah I just edited it to say that. Yeah that's what made 2016 so fun to track
  3. Whereas if we had this same Baja energy in a nino with cold air in place...we'd already be popping champagne wouldn't we?
  4. I was about to say man that rectangle was straight-up disrespectful! Hahaha And yeah that is pretty solid overall.
  5. I think it's because it was coupled with it's AI counterpart also going way south, lol Edit: And now the gefs too
  6. Right there with you. It ain't right, I'm telling ya...a whole generation is going through their childhood without knowing what it's like! I was blessed to have a childhood with 1996, 2000, 2003, and 2006. But this time? I mean dang over a decade you'd think ONE time we could get something more than an inch or two to work out. And our yards in particular! There's some imaginary snow shield or something, smh I just don't get it, smh Yeah this one is far from resolved but you can't but feel like "Here we go again" when you see a model showing an unfavorable solution. Even the dang Ninos we've had in 18-19 and 23-24 didn't do jack diddly SQUAT. I mean we likely have another one coming next year so maybe we can try that again but man...rough!
  7. Yeah because unlike then this one has had more agreement overall. But again this is a nina so these things are more likely to happen. I just hope we get a couple more swings at it in case this doesn't work out
  8. Always possible since ninas gonna nina. What looks straightforward on the outside still has complications on the inside...oof. The AIGFS going south was discouraging...
  9. Yeah but that news is being tempered a bit at the moment... ai runs are more south this afternoon, smh
  10. Is that the earliest piece of this we gotta watch to make sure it goes right? Lol
  11. Wasn't even depicted that high on today's guidance, lol
  12. @Ralph Wiggum mentioned in the other sub that across all guidance the high weakened slightly from thr 1050s to 1044 at the most
  13. I think that'll be good for both our subs...because a weakee high would lessen suppression risk, right?
  14. Yeah ya don't have much choice especially if there are other things to track too, lol
  15. Hey, as long as I don't see suppression I'm good. Because if it's amped like whst is being modeled now...it's possible that everybody will have a chance to have their biggest snowfall in a decade. Let the jack zones roll
  16. So what sounds like a pretty decent bump north, no? And hey...if 8-10" is the fringe job? I'll take it (while still being only slightly jealous )
  17. Always something to keep in mind...(What was Feb 2006? An overruning event, or?)
  18. That would still be my biggest snowfall in 10 years! If that would be a "fail" scenario, then that would be a heck if a consolation prize.
  19. Oh okay. PBP fail @bncho -- you said it was technically a shift south but it actually ticked north! Dropping your grade to a C+
  20. Except for the GEFS and EPS...would really like to see those on board too
  21. Sweet mercy that's a lot of orange sherbet! (TM)
  22. Listen I will happily risk amped over suppression any day...keep that ampin' and rampin'!
×
×
  • Create New...