Jump to content

Chris78

Members
  • Posts

    4,048
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chris78

  1. 8 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

    I don’t love the miller B look, which makes it possible for NW of DC to miss both upcoming threats. I’d be pissed if it happened

    That's my concern lol. Tennessee valley sees snow on Monday. North East gets it next Friday/Saturday.  We're in the middle.

    I think there was some crazy 1400 hour snow maps that kind of looked that way a couple weeks ago. :lol:

    • Weenie 1
  2. Just now, winter_warlock said:

    All models are in line except euro... Euro is looking like a drunk uncle lol

    Well.   Only 4 days away now. Ud think euro would  get more in line. Hopefully euro puts the tequila bottle down and joins the rest at 06z lol

    Not sure I've ever seen this much of a difference between euro and gfs at day 4.

    But not sure I've seen models jump so much run to run within 5 days 

    Lots of moving pieces for the models to nail down.

    • Like 2
  3. 2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

    Oddly all the guidance at 12z kinda fell into their biases I've observed, GGEM/UKMET over amped, ICON progressive, GFS too far SE, except the Euro which was off on its own planet.  Just an observation, not sure what to do with it.  

    Models are definitely having a hard time with all the moving pieces.

    This might be weenie talk lol but it certainly seems like confiuence always ends up further north than advertised from Day 5+ on the models.

    Would less confluence give us a better outcome?

    • Like 1
  4. 1 minute ago, Heisy said:

    18z control is kind of odd at end of run. Just posting cause it tends to follow OP pretty closely and im bored.

    Trough is really positively tilted. It almost looks like it was gonna dig and close off at the back end of the trough, which would have maybe allowed the front to clear first. Almost anafrontal…

    Here is 18z eps as well 618e5bfa94d6a1b6367fc584246b2679.jpg

    59fe0b351860e4733047a6754dbad0ae.jpg


    .

    The control certainly doesn't look the gfs with the tail end if the trough. 

    GfS much further east with it all.

    I would say the Control was going to have a storm in the East with that h5. 

    Don't know if it would be a good track for us but plenty of energy left at the end. 

    • Like 1
  5. 2 hours ago, mitchnick said:

    I think it's fair to say most are here for the snow. Even with that general forecast that matches strong Niños, many of those Niños had snow during warm months.  I think it’s also fair to say that decent winter show themselves by now taking into consideration the date and forecasts for the next 10 days. If we're honest, this winter fails to have any characteristics of a decent/snowy winter. Using Bwi as my benchmark, if we/they fail the rest of January, which I  would define as 2":or less for them and 4" or less here, we're looking at 94/95 and 97/98 as a viable strong Niño options. I'll stop right there.

    I agree with your assessment. Good winters find a way to snow. This winter isn't shaping up that way. It's been very tough so far.

    The next week is cutter city.

    After that we have a shot. It we miss that then we're looking at late January early February. 

    I believe bwi is still at a trace? 

    Things can change quickly. It just takes 1 well timed storm but so far this isn't the feel of an above average winter.

    • Like 2
  6. 16 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

    Looks like we need to be worried more about suppression on the GEFS than a cutter for the 16th.

    The only concern I have with suppression is if there's no storm lol.

    Yesterday's storm was majorly suppressed till inside a week. On its way north we fell into the bullseye for about a day of model runs 5 days out. 

×
×
  • Create New...