CAPE

At first glance I read that as " Big Stout" lol. Which reminds me I need to get some before the weekend. OK back on topic!

Google AI- Key Methods for Determining Snow Ratios in NBM: Temperature-Based Algorithms: The SLR is highly dependent on boundary layer and low-level temperatures (surface to 850 mb). Generally, colder air results in higher ratios (fluffy, dry snow), while temperatures near freezing produce lower ratios (wet, dense snow). Melting Rates for Marginal Temperatures: For temperatures at or above 32°F, the NBM v4.2 incorporates idealized melting rates. The total SLR is reduced based on the ratio of melting to accumulating snow, effectively lowering the ratio if the snow melts as it falls. Dynamic/Algorithm-Based Ratios: Instead of a default 10:1, the NBM uses algorithms that consider factors such as: Wind Speed: Higher wind speeds can lead to lower ratios due to snowflake fracturing. Cloud Structure: The presence of supercooled water droplets (higher riming) vs. depositional growth influences the ratio. Ensemble Member Blending: The NBM uses output from several models (HRRR, GFS, ECMWF) to calculate a probabilistic snowfall, utilizing the best-performing models to determine the most likely ratio for a given area. Elevation Adjustments: Ratios are adjusted upward at higher elevations to account for colder, drier conditions in mountainous terrain.

That's what we are talking about lol. Already posted.

Yeah looks like it factors in multiple variables for SLR.

I would assume so.

Latest blend. I think we got us a solid signal across guidance for a major winter storm lol

2 ft in southern VA including the Northern neck lol

It is 'funny' how Josh Allen mistakes are downplayed while Lamar's are magnified. Imagine if Lamar turned the ball over 4 times in a playoff game then cried afterward. The hate would be off the charts. Good player, but the Josh Allen love by the media is nauseating.

I just want a long duration snow event with temps in the mid teens. Strong lift through the DGZ with 15:1 or better ratios. Is that too much to ask? Been awhile.

Yeah this wont be the final answer. Hopefully better.

Latest blend. NWS relies pretty heavily on this product at range when there is still some disparity among guidance. Don't see this often 5 days out.

Yeah its not done-

I agree(you saw my post a couple pages back). 12z does actually eject significant energy from the SW, via a partial phase with the energy dropping south from the Pac NW. 18z doesnt, its flatter, but is slightly better with the silly snow maps. Ofc that's only part of the story- the timing/depth of NS energy associated with the TPV is another component.

On the GFS its mostly how much interaction/phasing occurs out west- more on the 12z while 18z pretty much misses, so ends up flatter/souther downstream with the precip. (see my post a page back) The 18z GEFS is closer to 12z wrt that interaction, but a tad later.