Jump to content

Typhoon Tip

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    42,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

5 Followers

About Typhoon Tip

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

49,037 profile views
  1. That's the other thing ... people are referring to the times as -NAO ? Not sure that applies to next week so much. The fact of the matter is, the -NAO is rising pretty rapidly from now through that period and beyond. Oh wait ...when are you guys talking about ?
  2. It depends... Not sure why people can't "imagine" soaring to 60? We've pulled that off at this time of year virtually every time spanning the last 8 of 'em at one point or the other. Just because we've been colder this year - okay... there's value in recognizing trend, but along the entire time we've not had models with red thickness contours as far N as we're seeing in guidance now. Meanwhile, the background tendency to go above normal at least excuse imaginable, relative to leading indicators, hasn't gone anywhere just because we had a couple of cool months. It will correct very fast if given a reason. Snow pack would offset some - but it's not clear how much if a warm front were to ever pass through. Probably a lot of low fog over rapid melt, then the next day it goes up...
  3. As others noted... weak system... 6 days away, a stronger more physically exerting moment in the atmosphere would probably show more comparative value among the three ens means, gfs/eps/geps than what we see here. Three different looks, what could go wrong?
  4. yeah, that's true. fast/speed is you know this is a good use case to help demo for whom ever needs it, how speed gets in the way. you can get a sense of that by looping how this SPV zooms in - that's a lot of mass to be moving that fast se, and so it then low captures ... after which it foists it back NW. It's like grabbing a running back from the back of their jersey for the tackle. That's the deep layer vortex actually outpacing the lower levels. I tell you what tho. Even with this whole mess trying to work out in a fast field, if the western heights were to amp a little that might offset that tendency enough for this to become a player. Not trying to hot dose anyone's dopa for the day just sayn what needs to go right.
  5. Let's just imagine for a sec the op GFS is onto something with the emphasis shifting from later on the 14th/15th, to an early amplification by the 13th. That 500mb vortex does actually capture this guys, and turns into a white 'cane for D.E.M. That's in the stone's through for us from 192 hours... just sayn'
  6. Not that continuity is typically better at 200 hrs. Ha! Models shouldn’t be judged really for that range. just have to wait
  7. This 12z operational GFS ... very low continuity over the last several model cycles. Out of nowhere, completely edits the cinema and goes from the left, the right from 00z to 12s. I mean there's some recognizable features there, but they are hugely reposition(ing) and changing amplitude ..etc... We are have bad deterministic value for the time being...
  8. It’s like the local synopsis is attempting to organize into a norland but before it can get there the arctic boundary t-bone crashed through the medium like the swipe of an etch n sketch
  9. mmm... I don't see a problem with not being impressed with this winter - but I suspect in some minds ... a lot of minds perhaps, there's still some failure to adopt and model their thinking and expectations with respect to the present state of the Global climate. If they did, it would do two things for their perceptions. 1, remark about what it actually must be in order to get the temperatures/causal cold loading to be what it has been. Suggests an impressive offset when considering, it is far in a way more likely that any given month will look like this below, than the other way around... 2, relative to that ... they would see that with the rarer opportunity to sustain such a cooler winter profile being realized, it thus kinda sorta feels like a failure to "make hay when the sun shines" ... or not... this aspect is probably more debatable. But we've had snowier winters at less negative departures. Start with that, and then it does seem like "wasting cold" so to speak.
  10. AI products are presenting un-good continuity from what I've just analyzed spanning their last 6 cycles. why any preferences and or judgements are formulated out of those tools, for the time being, is a mystery to me. Oh pleezy weezie, with sugar on top
  11. It’s probably outside of AI range too I’m sensing you guys are putting way too much weight in those tools and you don’t even know how they’re actually run. Yeah they might’ve done a couple of events, but the sample size is too small. My advice pump the brakes at day, 11 or 10 or whatever it is
  12. I'm wondering if my memory is divorced from reality a bit on that... I was mentioning earlier in a post that I thought that Jan warm up turned out not very convincing - if it was +10, it was very convincing. I'm wondering also if it was a +3 in NYC and +13 up by PF type of deal, too? anyway, the reason my memory is the way it is is because I remember a lot of mornings we refroze the 3.5" pack that was incredibly resistant to melt that whole period. I think the last couple of days ( seriously ...I remember taking note of this) it finally succumb and disappeared. The having snow on the ground much of the way is why I thought it as not so convincing.
  13. It's a springy blue bomb, really ... it is... that's a marginal- profile type of event. -3 at 800, 0 at 900 and the surface - just in my imagination correcting for random suspects...
×
×
  • Create New...