mitchnick

Gunna' need a very nice -Epo after losing the -Nao.

Go with JI on this one. Lol

It's that pesky GL low pumping the ridge as they always do. Too far away to worry, but several people seemed to not understand why the surface High to the north was ineffective.

Look what's in the Great Lakes.

Come on. End of run storms are a dime a dozen and I can't think of one that's ever worked out. Too many things to go wrong Until we get a confirmation by the operationals and ensembles, all we have is potential. Big deal.

It's close though.

As it often does.

Must you be so greedy?

Same unworkable garbage at 186hrs on the Gfs with this roll over ridge in the central US. Edit: On the Gem, only warmer.

You're fine. They always (90%+) drift north. Ask Connecticut posters.

Still going here. Just lt, non-accumulating stuff that's not on radar.

That's the scientific reason not to worry about them, but what do you suggest for weenie paranoia?

I was trying to figure out why the snowfall mean onbthe Eps was as low as it was for that period and it has 850's AN. As a result, the decent snowfall on the Eps is further north into central PA. Actually, I'm sorta surprised by the AN 850's considering that 5H look, but maybe we disregard 850's at this point and live in denial.

That west coast trough suggests to me we get a progressive flow. But what does this weenie know?

That's it...shut er' down, turn off the lights, grab your bats and balls.