Jump to content

mitchnick

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,636

  • Joined

About mitchnick

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location:
    Hanover, PA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. mitchnick
    Here are CPC numbers for all 4 Enso areas for 6/10/15 & 6/10/26: 10JUN2015 25.5 2.0 27.8 1.2 28.7 0.9 29.8 0.9 10JUN2026 26.1 2.7 28.3 1.6 29.2 1.5 30.1 1.3ⁿ If you divide Enso 1.2 anomaly into the other 3 areas' anomalies for both years, you get respectively 60%, 45% and 45% in 2015 and 59.25%, 55.55% and 48.15% this year. Comparing the 2 years, Enso 3 is nearly identical for both years and 3.4 and 4 are a hair warmer this year than 2015. Obviously, there may be other ways to figure it, but I'd have to say that they are very similar with a slight edge to 2015 as being more east based under this method. P.s. @GaWx will surely check my math! Lol
  2. mitchnick
    Time would be my guess.
  3. mitchnick
    Idk Don, but even I must admit Don's in denial on this one Buckeye.
  4. mitchnick
    It was last year at this time when the PDO started its dump. Interesting to see if we repeat. I know Larry uses Ncep(?) numbers, but I think they pretty much followed the same trend as this graph. Feel fee to correct me Larry.
  5. mitchnick
    Didn't realize this thread was here. I've been over the main Enso thread fighting the warmanistas with no help from @Stormchaserchuck1. Honestly, the Cfs2 does have historic potential written all over it for February and March. Coincidentally, latest 500mb runs for December looked similar at times to Euro seasonal fwiw.
  6. mitchnick
    From someone who has, for better or worse, followed the Cfs2 forecast follies over the years, the bias corrected SSTA plumes have almost always been more accurate, whether warmer or cooler. Fwiw
  7. mitchnick
    This month's Euro seasonal doesn't look that impressed for hurricanes/tropical systems beyond climo, with only the eastern Pacific showing a slightly higher frequency while all areas down in the intensity (ACE) department, except western Pacific where it forecasts straight climo.
  8. mitchnick
    Nobody is forcing anyone to consider any model. But if someone posts a model's SSTA forecast, what's so wrong or unusual about posting it's resulting weather forecast. It's done all the time.
  9. mitchnick
    The weather is what counts, and I'm not seeing anything different than previous extremes being forecasted by the same models forecasting your "global climate disruption." In fact, there's yet to be an agreement on the resulting weather.
  10. mitchnick
    I said weather in the east.
  11. mitchnick
    So you can post verbatim model conditions if they suggest a furnace but not if the same model suggests conditions otherwise?
  12. mitchnick
    Conditions on the earth a couple thousand+ miles from mby are meaningless to me except how they effect weather imby.
  13. mitchnick
    There will certainly be rainstorms as any winter, but considering the light tan is only +.5C and the next level up is only +1C, there would certainly be plenty of snow threats in there imho with such small AN progs. Plus, the individual month maps for January and February look even better.
  14. mitchnick
    You forgot to mention temps/precip on the NMME are pretty sweet for winter lovers in the east for Dec-Feb. Individual months look decent as well imho. Links start in December. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=nmme&region=us&pkg=T2ma_nmme&runtime=2026060800&fh=6 https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=nmme&region=us&pkg=apcpna_month_nmme&runtime=2026060800&fh=6
  15. mitchnick
    The thought that you would question the great JB's claim of a weather record setter is shocking, just shocking.
×
×
  • Create New...