RyanDe680

Sounds like some UNCERTAINTY SEVERITY

The block!!!

But there's no block!

I feel like with all of these variants, we won't be able to keep up and know all the differences. I read about something new in Iowa I thought?

fixed that...

Plumes say meh, little less than 1"

What a trash system. So much potential and garbage looking results.

This sucks.

it was cold

I don't doubt that the vaccines are working, but not enough to show in these numbers. You're seeing a drop as we are coming off the holidays and people aren't having large get togethers like were happening during Thanksgiving, Xmas and New Years - that's what kept the numbers up through January... This drop was somewhat expected. The real test will be into February, as this new variant that is more contagious and perhaps (unknown yet) more deadly. If we can fend that off, then I would believe that vaccinations play a bigger role.

It's getting old having to scroll that much

I’m at about 10.5”

Lake effect seems overdone?

And unfortunately that’s why there will never be one. we’re fortunate to have you here

Toss

Torching here. Up to 33

I would think that the snow cover keeps us cooler in LOT and the screw hole south east of lot wouldn’t verify with these totals. Satellite showed bare ground there.

Had to check if I was in last weeks thread...

Zing!

^ yep

If this pans out as rain and the cold flows in, maybe not as dramatic as the GFS advertises, in the week following, talk about glaciers....

even this caved now... showing 0.50"

but in it's defense, it gives us 0.50"..... of snow.

Plumes comfortably averaging 8.5", with 2 now above 12"

At least I talk about stale plume data brah. Yellow tag me speaking of which, 0.70” qpf mean. Showing a bit above 7” so on a 10:1. based on that initial radar view, with an atmosphere quick to saturate, dare we say a chance of an over performer?