Jump to content

WxWatcher007

Members
  • Posts

    33,617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WxWatcher007

  1. From a follower in West Hartford around the time of the tor warning @weatherwiz
  2. One of my concerns (down in CT) is that we don’t see the discrete cell tornado risk, but rather cells in NY that congeal and bring a straight line risk.
  3. 18z NAM has activity up in NNE around 12z tomorrow. Those soundings tomorrow from Albany to HFD look messy but legit.
  4. Two days, two FFWs, 1.27” of rain. I was at ~.33 on the month.
  5. Today seems like a good example of a discrete cell taking advantage of the environment.
  6. I can count on two fingers the times it has hailed in my back yard. One was in DC and the other was in CT on December 30, 2019.
  7. I cannot fukkin believe this. I’m not home.
  8. STW instead of FFW for now in central CT. Right by the house…that I’m not at lol.
  9. Matter of time until central CT is back under a FFW with those stationary storms.
  10. You know you’re in a torch spot when 95/75 is called fairly brutal lol
  11. It gives cause for pause but as you probably know that’s the case more often than not up here. @weatherwiz it’s probably time for a thread?
  12. Mesoscale Discussion 1371 NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 1111 AM CDT Sat Jun 22 2024 Areas affected...central into eastern NY...CT...RI...western and central MA Concerning...Severe potential...Watch possible Valid 221611Z - 221815Z Probability of Watch Issuance...40 percent SUMMARY...Storm coverage to increase with a corresponding uptick in intensity expected 1-4pm EDT (17-20 UTC). Widely scattered 50-65 mph gusts capable of wind damage will be the primary threat. Marginally severe hail (0.75 to 1.25 inches in diameter) may occur with the strongest cell. An upgrade to Slight Risk is forthcoming in the 1630 UTC Day 1 Convective Outlook. DISCUSSION...The 12 UTC (8am EDT) Albany, NY raob showed a very moist profile with PW 1.94 inches and weak lapse rates. Around 500 J/kg MLCAPE was noted in this observed sounding. Visible-satellite imagery shows an agitated cumulus field over central and eastern NY to the south of a few ongoing thunderstorms. A stratus deck is observed over the eastern half of MA into RI, and this stratus loosely corresponds with the placement of a west-northwest to east-southeast oriented stationary front. Additional heating since this morning's raob at Albany (1000-1500 J/kg MLCAPE likely at midday) has contributed to a destabilizing airmass from central NY east-southeast into CT to the south of the stationary front. Of particular note compared to yesterday, slightly stronger 1-6 km westerly flow (20-35 kt) is observed at the WSR-88D KENX VAD (Albany). This slight enhancement to westerly flow coupled with MLCAPE rising into the 1500-2000 J/kg range and near 2 inches PW, will probably favor a small cluster or two developing over the next several hours. As this thunderstorm cluster matures, it seems plausible a focused area for 50-65 mph gusts and potential widely scattered wind damage may occur from the Hudson Valley into MA/CT and perhaps as far east as RI. ..Smith/Hart.. 06/22/2024
  13. An EML would’ve locked it in
  14. The way the SPC was talking tomorrow looks higher end somewhere.
  15. What are you guys thinking about tomorrow and Sunday @weatherwiz & @CoastalWx? Tomorrow looks like some more scattered stuff while Sunday is about if we can get discrete stuff to pop?
  16. Guidance signaled something about ten days ago, but lost it. Yesterday when recon was in there it had a closed circulation but it was very weak. Overnight it started threading the needle between a lot of dry air by producing consistent deep convection in a low shear environment and it looked like it was organizing, but this morning shear hit and when recon got there even though I think it was a sheared TC the NHC decided against it. Pressures were really high too to be fair. Since that flight it’s become exposed and just never got it together. Anyway, there’s a whole thread on the tropical board. NHC avoids the criticism that they name every swirl—at least this week.
  17. That’s what I’m talking about!
  18. Because it was a TC (imo) last night and when recon got to it this morning shear killed the organization 92L had.
  19. These were the ones that stood out to me. Again, nothing earth shattering but noteworthy by my eye at the moment.
  20. Didn’t look strong on radar but was noteworthy when I first saw it.
×
×
  • Create New...