WxWatcher007

Yeah I think it requires time for eyes to adjust. Much like seeing stars.

I guess I’m not sleeping tonight

I think it ebbs and flows? I’m actually in northern MD tonight. Clear skies back home lol.

This one looks legit. Hopefully some cloud breaks tonight lol.

Shame clouds will be around. This is a massive sunspot even by sunspot standards.

Really important data point as we enter model analysis

How is he? Haven’t heard from him in a while.

Good stuff in eastern Connecticut today

24 days until the start of hurricane season

Hopefully someday I can enjoy a real hailstorm. Nada here in central CT. Even NW kinda struck out.

1.5” hail reported in Pomfret.

Good luck. Looked like more straight line than tor to me but congrats E CT.

Congrats Russell

Pocket of 1k ML CAPE into western CT now. If we can get something to fire we could rock for a bit. Shear is legit on mesoanalysis.

Going up quickly too. Won’t be long until they’re warned.

80/63 at Danbury

I thought it was on the profile, but noted. East Hartford, CT

First breaks of sun here

3k NAM has a fair amount of clearing down in CT by mid afternoon.

Wiz is down on it.

I agree that storm mode did look mostly messy, and that’s what happened for the most part. Also agree about parameters. They look pretty and can be valuable, but it doesn’t replace a fundamental understanding of the environment itself.

I hear you. I don’t think I saw the SPC or local news go over the top with this. I think a lot of the general public expects imby precision that just isn’t possible. I don’t know how we get over that communication gap, but I think that’s a big piece of it. I am a believer of only using extreme language in extreme events but your “chance of a tornado” example isn’t a case of that. If there’s a tornado risk albeit small, how do you leave that out of a forecast? Usually what I do is try to explain the SPC percentages. People tend to get that. For example, there’s a risk, but it’s 2%. There’s a greater chance of wind damage so let’s focus on that. If I need to explain more I do. If I see something that enhances or mitigates a risk I (usually) say it.

Opening bid—subject to change 28/13/6