Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,231

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. DDweatherman
    Definitely wasn't worse... but only some of us can interpret outputs I guess.
  2. DDweatherman
    Let's hear a little more about your thoughts. The evolution verbatim I'm not sure it will get with all these waves in flow.
  3. DDweatherman
    Didn't realize the RGEM was a solid improvement actually from 12z oddly enough. Better phase further west.
  4. DDweatherman
    Same, that was better in some ways. 18z GFS is also "not worse" than 12z if you ask me. Bleeding stopped maybe we can now bring it NW.
  5. DDweatherman
    Yeah it's quite a coincidence for sure lol. Thank God I chose to take this past event in Deep Creek. However, we all know nothing is the same as our backyards taking the big hits.
  6. DDweatherman
    Do you think we have the option of a solid event if the northern stream can keep digging regardless of the southern stream energy. In that regard, Euro and some of the 12z's gave us hope (ICON, NAM come to mind)
  7. DDweatherman
    Now you know I'm not. But the Euro is just not the pedestal model it was, and we've seen its performance this season on some systems. That being said, as I mentioned earlier, the flow is just too fast and progressive to have more than a Bob Chill type 3-6/4-8 type event. But that would still likely occur south of us because of where the energy is interacting and the digging of the streams. Lots of reasons not to buy into the good runs besides it being the only model showing snow...
  8. DDweatherman
    I would say if we got a positive trend from the GFS, then maybe. Definitely not showing the same thing now and the GFS went the other way at 12z.
  9. DDweatherman
    What we really need to hope is what I posted yesterday, that the GFS and Euro meet in the middle.
  10. DDweatherman
    Saw that post you just deleted Randy... haha
  11. DDweatherman
    48 was pretty bad, but the northern dig helps make up some of our ground. We're trending positive that way and negative with the southern energy. Sadly, the overall outcome because of that trade off will go more in the way of the GFS.
  12. DDweatherman
    At least it will be a low suspense ending for the brief hope we had. Still was fun doing the PBP of those runs with monster hits.
  13. DDweatherman
    Through 48, I think it's already early enough to say next based on h5. Energy held back more to the sw and northern stream not as far S. And I don't have a reason to poo poo the threat, I want snow just as much as Randy does.
  14. DDweatherman
    Keep us posted as the run comes out.
  15. DDweatherman
    We've seen that one before... so don't rule it out.
  16. DDweatherman
    Funny wouldn't be the word. I'd probably jump off the balcony into a snow drift here at Deep Creek if the Euro holds.
  17. DDweatherman
    You all can crucify me later for waving the white flag. Weather isn’t just models and you know that as well. Our base state and the speed of the flow argues against a Euro like solution and phase. 18z last night was it’s peak there with amping our wave. Happy to eat my words if needed but under normal circumstances we’d be ready to call this one.
  18. DDweatherman
    12z GEFS supports the op from a mean perspective. More strung out trough which would indicate energy being held to the SW.
  19. DDweatherman
    It's believable the GFS could be mishandling S/S energy and its release, but the release of that energy to phase w/our system is like 48-54 hour lead, pretty short. Then again, we ask ourselves...can the Euro and its EPS be that off as well with it?
  20. DDweatherman
    The GFS really has improved drastically this year. Sadly, we'll like what we see on the GEFS most likely re: what @MillvilleWxjust said about them not being upgraded. May explain why 6z GEFS had some good hits.
  21. DDweatherman
    The NAM at 12z really improved the N/S as well and did release the S/S energy vs 6z.
  22. DDweatherman
    What's weird is the 6z euro even outpaced the N/S a bit with that southern energy. it was going to phase later but pull the storm even more north. The GFS and CMC have the S/S obviously trailing.
  23. DDweatherman
    Somehow not overall a worse outcome vs 6z. If the GFS is just a little wrong with the S/S energy, we'd be in business. However, the latest RGEM did the same overall evolution. Even the ICON I'd say was good with the N/S, but that energy needs to release.
  24. DDweatherman
    If we could have seen any sort of progress in releasing the SS energy, we'd probably have a hit this run. Other models have released it quicker but the GFS looks like the RGEM which was a big step back at 12z IMO. It's about curtains for this one in my opinion.
  25. DDweatherman
    Even if the N/S is an improvement, which it is a bit more S by 66, the phasing we'd need to match the Euro evolution would be really difficult progressing from there.
×
×
  • Create New...