Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,274

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. DDweatherman
    @WinterWxLuvr What I'm saying is thats why mets are calling it a B in here. Did I say that was my opinion? It seems more a hybrid to me, but the reality is I'm focusing on the outcome and evolution...regardless of nomenclature.
  2. DDweatherman
    Hey, as long as we don't pull the 1 step forward, 2 steps back thing, we're doing okay for now. After all, @stormtracker is in
  3. DDweatherman
    Let me simplify things for you @WinterWxLuvr, if theres energy being transferred, we're calling it a Miller B. That should be simple enough.
  4. DDweatherman
    Well one of the things we definitely would like to see is a more mature coastal low further SW, that is especially key in these types of setups.
  5. DDweatherman
    Deeper low earlier, consolidating the camps
  6. DDweatherman
    I'm more focused on this
  7. DDweatherman
    GEFS coming in with some good looking member tracks, definitely west of previous suites. Less energy being held back.
  8. DDweatherman
    The GGEM bombs it out big time too, do that further west please. Fluff and windy
  9. DDweatherman
    If happy hour would just do what its supposed to. It wouldn't hurt to see the euro come even further west.
  10. DDweatherman
    Eastern shore is crushed on the GGEM, more so than NYC. Boston is obliterated though. Nice move west.
  11. DDweatherman
    GGEM a big move back west from 0z, scrapes 95 with the moderate stuff, but a good 100 miles west of where 0z had the low.
  12. DDweatherman
    Wheres @Ji
  13. DDweatherman
    Awaiting GGEM hourly panels to see if the dad follows that move
  14. DDweatherman
    Sfc low was about 100 miles west of 6z, pretty sizeable move.
  15. DDweatherman
    I've been blunt and honest through tracking this whole storm... if the GFS makes another move like it just did from 6z to 12z on the next run, we'll be having a celebration in here. Trough orientation was much better and sharper at h84 as a result of cleaner phasing allowing better tilt.
  16. DDweatherman
    Cleaner phase so far, agreed on that part.
  17. DDweatherman
    Agree but in order for good trends there to have play for us, we’d need that interaction with the southern vort to be cleaner than some of the runs that take it wide right.
  18. DDweatherman
    I’ll defer to Randy, I like h72… Rome wasn’t built in a day so no guarantees we get a nice outcome verbatim, but these were good trends for sure
  19. DDweatherman
    In the end, yes. But early on I’m going to bet against a closed off energy in the four corners resulting in a coastal hit for our area…which is correct
  20. DDweatherman
    This one will be a great example of showing how much implication these minor changes early on have downstream
  21. DDweatherman
    I don’t hate it thru 60, shouldn’t be worse not that it matters relative to 6z
  22. DDweatherman
    Disagree, digging in a bit further west
  23. DDweatherman
    Same, but it’s also probably wrong so we won’t speculate it too much
  24. DDweatherman
    If you believe in the snow gods, pray one time for a gfs shift that brings out a
  25. DDweatherman
    Gfs looks solid thru 12, in that it’s still running
×
×
  • Create New...