Jump to content

WEATHER53

Members
  • Posts

    7,669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WEATHER53

  1. So this would be long duration light snow with 850s -10C . Just .05ph is 0.8 after 16 hours
  2. I count 11 out of 50 that hit us good and last night I think it was 15 so still there for us
  3. It can be good for cold air but always seems our low gets scooted east. Is that because of the counter clockwise flow around the Hudson Bay Area?
  4. You can always bite me and/or use the ignore feature. It takes a maturity level that you lack to not lash out if your model babies get called ugly i dont believe I ever directed anything directly to you so your attack at me is immature and inappropriate. Also you are foolishly arrogant to pose as some sort of board spokesman . The ignore feature is yours. I will have no need to speak to you again. Models suck at predicting snow for around here. If you can’t deal with that then keep it to yourself.
  5. Yes they do hit cold outbreaks very well. With storms the amount of “ingredients” is just too tough to decipher.
  6. How can anything that is “scientific” jump around like this?
  7. Long duration event of 18+ hours is what we do well, If temps cold snd/or dark then 0.25 up to .0.5”ph would impress.
  8. Merit but maybe not as exampled .’I would like 12” in 28 hours more than 20” in 16.
  9. Honestly one part of Snowmaggedon was a long steady 0.5ph and then that spectacular early day blizzard like and then ending. Thought 16 was long duration also. ?
  10. Steady light to moderate 24 hour events seem to be the better ones for us last 15 years than intense quicker hitter
  11. I’m going to stop doing this. I know what I see from models and won’t be told different. Rather right now ride the wave of good potentiality
  12. I just looked at a model pack with 70 differing solutions for DC. From 0 to 15”. That’s A Lot of Examples. How many more would you need to call it “every possible outcome” ??
  13. Yes and ifs are useless but if that low could have moved in Friday at 10am then I think that air mass at that time would have snowed us
  14. 15 out of 70 a huge hit for DC. isn’t that higher than usually seen?
  15. We are a right smart candy ass now vs our school years.
  16. In the early 2000’s I was losing power for 24 hours about every other year. Snow or wind did it. About 5 times in a 10 year run. They came through around 2012 and I have not lost power for more than 3 hours and that one a guy flew a plane into wires.
  17. Isabel and the storm thst created OC and this dumb bulb is dismissing as non exceptional and referenced incorrect wind direction
  18. Well at least a lot of Lows are being fired at Our target
  19. This was the depiction for the early Jan event about 4/5?days before we got rain and 50. I hit really excited about an A but turned out further north and west, stronger with excellent cold air scooting out in 24 hours and thus temps over 20 degrees warmer.
  20. Because, they are show every possible outcome I think I’m beginning to understand that models are for fun but not forecasting. This can help alleviate some of my angst and poor interactions at times. When it shows snow and 28 at noon today for Tuesday and then shows rain and 60 at 18z then Neither was a Prediction of an actual high percentage outcome but rather an example of “if a,b,c, d” then such an outcome will follow and 6 hours later show “e,f,g,h” and just keep rotating every 6 hours. im happy to finally get this through my thick head and perhaps I can just sit back and enjoy the myriad of examples that will be forthcoming.
  21. Thanks Does the coonskin cap get wet and stinky in all this rain?
×
×
  • Create New...