Jump to content

SBUWX23

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    1,283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SBUWX23

  1. The forcing should be a bit better Fri if it evolves. Just concerned if it's soley the inverted trough that lots will be screwed by it. Always difficult to know where
  2. Winds are still NNE. If it stays that way parts of nw LI into the city may never get above 32. But if it's around 32 any zr won't be an issue. Bigger concerns for black ice tonight though as temperatures fall.
  3. The snow is not just gonna disappear. Roads will improve but you'll have snow on the ground by time it goes back below freezing
  4. Yes I saw. Another problem is there is low placement issues along the potential Inverted trough. You can see that on the 84 hr nam. There is a lot of energy coming in around the PV so could be a reflection of that.
  5. The good news is it's close to 32. It's self limiting during the day and with temps rising slowly it'll prevent any significant issues. It's gonna be a problem tonight though when temps crash with standing water.
  6. Need to see a few more of these on other guidance as well. Yes, I have seen the ensembles and see some are closer but the large majority keeps the main low well east. Will we see a trend closer?
  7. I think the calls that models and forecasters busted a premature. Off by an inch? That's simply within the realm of error when it comes to snowfall forecasting. We did pretty good on LI, now sleeting here in Yaphank area. It's always better not use snowfall maps from models as they do not account for anything other than qpf. Snowfall habit and other characteristics are never handled well by models. The other thing this ended up being a little more banded over stratiform. It wasn't necessarily dry air moreso how the forcing evolved. Enjoy the snow that's out there! And finally that ridiculous stat is broken. CPK got 1.8 in that event last February but it was over 2 calendar days. So tired of hearing about the snowless streak when it snowed, just under an inch in two back to back days
  8. Im not the CMC biggest fan, but it never let go of this system tonight although it was too strong and too far inland. It never ceases to amaze me how wonky the GFS is when there a potential coastal event here thats not rain. I am still not completely sold on this one though. I know the "indices" are changing, but that PV could easily squash this thing and push it offshore like the GFS.
  9. I think the 00z nam has some feedback with convection with the low that is resulting in higher qpf out east. Not sure if I buy that
  10. There is frontogenesis Involved so there will be a transition zone somewhere that could cut into the higher end snow amounts. I'd favor it getting over the I-95
  11. Not sure I understand your take here. No one is expecting a blizzard. With all due respect there is plenty of thermal forcing for several hours to support the consensus forecast of 1-3 or 2-4 depending on location. City is in a good spot for 2-4.
  12. Typical, we are in 4-5 day range now and models "backing off" on the end of week/early weekend potential.
×
×
  • Create New...