coastalplainsnowman
Members-
Posts
975 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by coastalplainsnowman
-
If that were to keep backing in like that we could end up with one of those surprise Montauk specials like in March 1998 (or was it 1999, I always forget), where they got 14", Riverhead maybe 6", flurries at the Nassau/Suffolk border, and Sam Champion showing mostly sunny skies from atop the Empire State Building. Not saying that's happening, but something like that did happen once.
-
Meanwhile, from the New York Post, 10 minutes ago: "Biggest snowstorm this season likely as nor’easter set to pummeled Northeast this week" The article itself equivocates a bit, but that headline does not. And "pummeled" - past tense - is in the actual headline, not a typo by me. https://nypost.com/2025/02/17/us-news/could-northeast-get-pummeled-by-noreaster-this-week/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
-
When it comes to forecasting. I don't know anything, and even I know that JB saying that there's a better chance of it snowing than we think, is right on brand. If I ever saw someone report here that JB is calling for less snow than current consensus, I would immediately rush out to buy a warm coat, because it would mean that hell has frozen over.
-
Maybe a met, or just someone with a better memory than me can chime in, but if memory serves, over the last twenty years, quite a few of our more memorable storms have been on our radar a week out, then were almost entirely lost, only to show up again with a vengeance a few days later. And I don't say this as someone rooting for a storm to happen. Normally I definitely would, but I'm supposed to be travelling Thursday.
-
You guys ever check out the Twitter (X) handle @lockingitin ? They post screenshots of the most extreme model runs, presumably as a joke, given that the handle is named LOCKITIN (all caps)
-
This is why sometimes ignorance is bliss. 99% of everyone watching this snow is enjoying it, but we can't quite enjoy it because we're thinking about Thursday and Saturday. What the hell are we doing lol. We want it to snow, it's freaking snowing, but we're not happy because it will rain in the future, *even though it is snowing on top of snow as we speak.* And I totally relate. If it was supposed to be cold the rest of the week with flurries Thursday and more snow Saturday, this would be more enjoyable.
- 338 replies
-
- 1
-
-
Out at lunch at school it hadn't started yet, and I said I hope it's not missing us. My friend, with no evidence, said 'Nah, we're gonna get crushed' and I wanted to believe it. We got nothing. Back in those pre-internet days I think it was days later that I heard one of the other News 12 rub salt in the wound, saying that Atlantic City got 18" and Montauk got a foot. So close. Back then we had very vague memories of '78, and awesome memories of '83, which came on like a wall at 12:45 PM.
-
Man, someone is living their best life right now.
- 338 replies
-
- 2
-
-
Back then it seemed like clippers were all we had. The sense was that anything big coming up the coast was preordained to be a heartbreaker snow to rain, if not outright rain for those of us near the coast. But if you could get in that narrow target zone of the clipper you were in business. Small business, but still business. And whereas today, a storm taking the traditional clipper path seems to frequently be a bad setup for us, where it's always marginal, back then I don't recall that being a problem (maybe because generally it was colder?) Then you'd get a nice enhancement etc action once in a while that would turn the 2-4 into the beloved 3-6 (6-12 in the 80s was fantasyland except for the few famous storms.) Edit: one more thing. The biggest nod to how great the 2000-2018 period was is that we don't refer storms as the "Blizzard of '78", "Blizzard of '83", etc. as if we be hearty sea captains. We had so many storms during that time that that kind of went away.
-
1-5? 2-6? 1-6? Is this not a first for these sorts of ranges? 1-6 is awfully close to 0-6. I get that may be the best we can do, but, if I may be scientific for a moment, that looks weird man.
