CT Rain

Lots of people have said it's not enough.

The underforecast resulted in probably 1-2 lost days of restoration. The years of neglect to the grid is probably a bigger issue in the grand scheme of things.

When you look at pictures from 1938 and the storms in the 50s and Donna it's amazing how few trees there are compared to now. We've let trees grow unchecked through our electrical grid. There's a price for that. The complete shut down in the tropics for us from 1991-2011 didn't help either as we grew accustomed to few wind storms.

That number includes UI - which was hit very hard being in the remnant eyewall. And yeah there were some epic inland gusts from Gloria.

Not a huge population difference as we have not grown that fast. More trees, fewer line crews, less maintenance, etc.

Yeah they definitely underestimated the storm. I think part of that is the forecast changing - over the weekend it didn't look nearly as bad to me as it did by Monday AM. The other issue is preparing for a reasonable worst case scenario... they were very clear they do not do that because it costs money. So this is a result. I also find it very hard to believe that this storm produced 1M peak outages while Hurricane Gloria produced 500k peak outages. Something is fundamentally broken with the power grid in that case.

It's pretty crazy. Maybe they were able to get things on faster this time with some of the smart grid tech they claim makes a difference? Still seemed like nothing changed with pre-staging, communicating with towns, poor tree maintenance, etc.

When we were under the tornado warning our peak gusts came from that convection. 50-55 knots easy here. Reminded me a lot of the epic southeaster a few years back just before Halloween.

Well that was wild. Bigger winds here than with Irene or Sandy. Tons of damage throughout town.

61 knots at KMJX

What's sort of interesting about this storm in general is that decent mixing in the boundary layer is progged. Very rare to see on a southerly flow event.

Do you have any video we can use on NBC CT? Would love to share!

Yeah, gonna pour a heavy drink for that call. I was working on a damn Iasias graphic at the time.

Well that was interesting. I'm annoyed I didn't go with the TDS sooner.

Definitely could be an active day in SE NY and CT. Low level wind fields strengthen through the day and we're talking about 200-400 m2/s2 of 0-3km SRH. Plenty of CAPE behind the warm front as well. As long as convection can fire up (not a ton of a synoptic scale trigger) there is certainly a tornado threat. This morning sort of reminds me of 7/1/2013.

It also has to strengthen some. A 1002 mb low over BDR isn't going to be very exciting. If the UKMet is right with something in the mid 980s then we'll have more of an opportunity for fun.

lol no kidding. If this goes too far west I'd be worried about missing out on rain. Do think there's a risk for some tornadoes east of the storm's path and at least some gusty wind particularly south coast. Not a huge storm but may be fun for some.

Yeah heights rise through the day. Nice shear/cape along the front just not sure we're going to get anything to form.

Yikes. This is as bad as your COVID takes.

JFK gusted to 46

DIT divide by 2 rule still in effect?

cool look with the melting layer around the radar site collapsing SE as the boundary layer cools and also the mid level warming 3-5kft up coming through CT and RI.

Blah flipped back to rain after about 1/4”

You may flip back. Looks like the warm layer is trying to wash out again on dual pol. Parachutes here

Monster aggregates here. 35/33.