Jump to content

OSUmetstud

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    16,433
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OSUmetstud

  1. Right. Might as well put it out at 44013 at this point.
  2. Where did they used to take the official boston ob?
  3. Lolz. 3 or 4:1 snow isnt even a real thing.
  4. This is like saying cocaine relieves a craving lol.
  5. I think that it's pretty subjective. It was a general model fail; there was good and bad all around.
  6. there's a pretty sizeable difference between the gfs and the nam/ecwmf. If something similar to the latter two verify you're getting a solid amount of snow.
  7. BUFKIT omega/soundings are only as good as the model you're using.
  8. Yeah the long range actually looks dare I say, like an El Nino. Aleutian low and PNA ridge with warm anomalies across Canada. That can still work for snow in the NE in mid-march.
  9. Old run vs. new run. It's more amplified and overall a better solution for most. Tracks near Nantucket.
  10. We'll just all eat our degrees and you can forecast all by yourself the rest of the season. How about that?
  11. I should say that the depth of the march 4th low and the ridging ahead of it are more important than the depth and position of this weekend's low.
  12. Im no expert at reading these....but it does seem like the strength of the ridge between the two lows matters a great deal.
  13. Definitely. Im a fan of those. I noticed it on big gfs and extended reg solutions for saturday/sunday. Seem to kick march 4th south.
  14. It does seem that generally speaking low 1 being more amplified yields more low 2 suppression.
  15. Ive never once considered this while forecasting. Seems ridiculous and probably not true.
  16. I think a watch from bos to pvd se is justified. Theres enough uncertainty to not go further nw, i think. Theres a lot of spread over all the guidance. The wrf arw/nmm suite was really dry on the 00z runs. The eps being a tick nw of the op was a good sign.
×
×
  • Create New...