The satellites that measured the ice from say 79-90 vs the 1000s more we have today, do you think that makes a difference at all? They are probably way more precise today with many more doing calculations than the handful we had 40 years ago. I wonder if we were to use 1980 tech to measure today what that would have come up with.
https://www.courierpostonline.com/story/news/local/new-jersey/2024/03/29/what-time-is-total-solar-eclipse-2024-south-jersey-map-path-time-zip-code-guide/73144083007/
You can put your zip in here and see what % of the sun will be visible
Came back from great weather in Aruba to great weather here (73), but also to tree that fell from the wind the other day and took out a few sections of pool fencing.
Yup, 20.5", but realize I was pretty lucky. The past 42 days I've had just about 29" of snow making this winter feel not as terrible as it was. About 15+ of those days were totally snow covered as well.
Turned out the long range guidance was wrong because the mid-range guidance was way off. If the guidance was correct in the day 7-10 range, then the longer range guidance would have probably occurred. I think way too many put too much stock in the long range guidance when in the mid-range guidance is barely reliable.
Yeah, nice to see him. Everyone here seems to know exactly what's going to happen weeks ahead of time. It's amazing! The whole place is like a funeral all the time. Like a bunch of old people talking about their ailments.