psuhoffman

I stopped watching his videos regularly years ago but yesterday I threw one on out of curiosity and he outlined the same progression I laid out a few days ago. It honestly made me feel less confident in my prediction.

Sounds like a normal day to me

+1

The VAST majority of Eagles fans wanted the GM gone. Some wanted both GM and coach gone. Almost no one wanted the coach gone and GM back. Way more agree with me that the GM is the main problem. Also...when it comes to coaching decisions Eagles fans imo aren’t the best to base your decisions on. They would fire every coach after every loss. Eagles fans are as logical wrt coaching expectations as Ji with snow.

All of them. It was impressive!!!

I have no idea. I’m just saying objective studies of it’s accuracy shows it has no validity. Their seasonal forecasts have a slightly better track record and show some skill above just random chance. But their day to day forecasts do not.

Agree but not my decision

Of course it’s non zero. If I made a random prediction for every day of the year I would hit several times by random chance also.

That was hard to watch and I hated every bit of that but I honestly don’t think it had anything to do with the decision. If it did they would have fired him immediately. Plus the GM knew about that plan going in so....they weren’t hiding it. They said during the week they intended to rest several starters and get the 3rd string QB some playing time. They said they were treating it like a preseason game. So then after suddenly it’s a problem? If it was that’s as much the GMs fault. In the end the coach and GM had a toxic relationship and the owner went with the wrong guy imo. The fact they are very close didn’t help.

Scientific analysis of their day to day forecasts show they have no more accuracy than random chance.

It’s never as simple as they make it seem on sports talk. Let me preface that I love our owner overall. He’s done way more good then bad over the years. And before I make him seem like the worst GM ever Howie Roseman did build the super bowl team. So he deserves props for that. But right now the owner is way to close to the GM. Andy had one truly bad season in 14 years and they fired him. Doug had one bad season in 5. Both seem rather impatient decisions Imo. And I consider the current issues way more personnel then coaching. They got old and injured and on top of that their last few drafts were busts and the QB lost his mind. And it’s all mental with Wentz. I dunno if it’s the head injury from last year but he totally lost his timing and feel this year. This play illustrates it best but this wasn’t an isolated thing. I dunno how the coach can fix that. He did that several times every game like his brain was in slow motion. Lastly given covid I would have just given this year a mulligan. But the GM was meddling in things that should be coaching decisions like assistant staffing decisions and playing time decisions and that situation finally boiled over. But imo Doug was a good coach. I liked his aggressiveness and play calling. I liked how hard the players played for him. Their failures seemed to be a lack of talent when it mattered not coaching.

I stubbed my toe. Is that relevant?

12z cmc kinda did that but the initial wave didn’t cut.

How the wooly worms look?

Of course it’s both. So happy for Andy. But my current GM has now fired two of the best coaches I’ve ever seen. And he hired Chip Kelly and tried to hire Adam Gase. I’m not confident in our future...

Both had a string of significant snows after those dates

The para is an upgrade but still based on the same physics. This seems to be a pretty substantive difference with how they handle the longwave pattern. Not shocking the para agrees with the older gfs.

Me either. I actually figured that by just adding what the qpf increased by on the last frame on TT

Number 1 day 8 pattern analog is Jan 28 1979. Number 2 is Jan 18 1966. Both immediately proceeded multiple snowstorms. This is not a pattern problem.

@CAPE fwiw (nothing) DC already has 2” by that last JMA panel according to the total QPF and obviously would still be snowing for a while after given that temp profile.

It could go either way. It’s all dependent on exactly how much mid latitude ridging there is ahead of the western trough and if it can punch a hole in the westerly flow under the block. And the differences are way too subtle to say imo. Of course recent history says go with the solution that screws us the most.

See that spike of cold down right to my house. Finally a Fing model that knows what’s up. Maybe I need to give it more love.

Don’t think it goes out far enough. Which should tell us something lol eta: I don’t blame anyone for the frustration. I’m full tilt now too. My full tilt just might not be as emotionally unstable as Ji’s but no way would I ever be bothering to analyze 200 hour operational (or even ensembles for that matter) if I wasn’t so anxious for us to get snow.

If COVID wasn’t going on I would seriously try to organize a group therapy snow field trip right now.

Careful to differentiate between a temporary cold moment due to dynamics and a truly expensive cold airmass. The Feb 10, 2010 storm was cold under the very intense mid and upper level lows that passed right over us. But that storm mixed with rain/sleet at the start all the way to central MD and it was 34 despite 2 feet is snowcover the day before and 38 despite 3 feet the day after at BWI. The temps did drop into the low to mid 20s with a ferocious wind during the height but that was dynamics driven not indicative of an arctic airmass. You remove the snowcover and storms and that week would have had highs of 40-50 degrees. ETA: 2003 had some true cold air masses but it was a moderate modoki nino with a once every 20 years type stable perfect pacific pattern. Yea that would work but it’s super rare and no chance in a Nina and not even a good bet in a nino.