Jump to content

78Blizzard

Members
  • Posts

    4,044
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 78Blizzard

  1. Given the predictive quality of the weeklies and the less than stellar performance of the deterministic models (yeah, they didn't give me enough snow) to date, I'm going with a colder than normal February, but in keeping with the trend of this winter, a fairly quiet month. Not a great one for us weenies here.
  2. Let's see if future GFS runs pick up on what the Euro is selling. The next run could be a real hoot after that 12z run.
  3. We can keep changing the title of this thread and keep pushing it out in time, maybe that will work. Meanwhile, in the longer term, we can watch as the GFS sends system after system to swim with the fishes.
  4. If you call an additional .05 qpf in my hood beefed up, lol. But the South Coast and LI did do better than that.
  5. Looks like it held serve from 18z for the most part.
  6. Yeah, sure. BTW, it was followed by an inland runner and then a cutter.
  7. Gotta love that run-to-run consistency in the long range.
  8. I have a feeling this thread won't reach the 125 pages of our last sh!tstorm discussion.
  9. Didn't the NAM zero in on the strength of the Jan 7 event before the others?
  10. At this point, I'll take what the NAM 12k and 3k are selling for Thursday.
  11. I think players making millions/year can afford to lose half a season as well. It's not like they're living paycheck to paycheck.
  12. These negotiations most times seem to resolve closer to start time, so this is no different. Pitchers and catchers are still scheduled to report about one month from now, so we'll see. Players are not paid in spring training as I understand, so they won't be losing anything if they hold out longer. The owners have more to lose with revenue loss.
  13. Posted December 14, 2020 - "Ike came in robust for 18z...edit..similar to 12z" I remembered this from last year because I never heard the Ikon referred to as Ike before. Apology wasn't needed, as I agree it is a lousy model.
  14. One difference so far with the last system is that at day 4.5-5 most op models had locked in to an inland runner, whereas the models this time are not in agreement. In fact, run-to-run each model can't seem to agree with itself. In a couple of days we should see model agreement.
  15. I'll try to remember that the next time you post it showing a massive hit for us.
  16. It seems we have to deal with dual lows on almost every system. Here we go again. Back to chasing that eastward convection, lol. How soon that happens will determine how much we get. This run of the Euro op looks good, but a long ways to go...
  17. It will be helpful when we get within 3 days of storm systems, you know, when it usually counts.
×
×
  • Create New...