Jump to content

78Blizzard

Members
  • Posts

    3,693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 78Blizzard

  1. 6 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

    It’s a pretty uniform SFC temp display across the south/east half of SNE… from CT to the South Shore.

    That steady moderate to heavy precipitation wet-bulbs everyone to 32-33F.  Theres some paste in there.

    IMG_7295.thumb.png.a6746272be7ac315f184ebf47db5d6a8.png

    The earlier GFS runs had 925 temps collapsing after 9z, despite what the NAM was showing then.

  2. 2 hours ago, JoeSnowBOS said:


    All Boston meteos saying mostly rain inside 95 with second half snow ranging from a Dusting to maybe 4 inches. Time will tell


    .

     

    1 hour ago, rgwp96 said:

     

    IMG_3761.jpeg

    TV mets say rain and up to 4" inside 95, yet Euro (and GFS) says those areas get the heaviest snow, clown map or not.  Other clowns say the same.  The same clown maps have no problem showing rain for the CMC, NAM and even the Ukie. 

  3. 13 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

    Growing confidence from EPS/Euro we see double digits somewhere in SNE, finally get this monkey off our back...

    Pike vs. NE MA vs. NH-MA border vs. SE MA jack tbd, but outside 128 belt Foxboro to Fitchburg looks great atm

    Opening bid from NWS... seems they are heavily factoring marine influence... the low-res Euro soundings are plenty cold 925 on up, so probably see that gradient closer to coast:  

    image.thumb.png.f17471c3d9334f2aabbe648597afe56c.png

    Is this depiction telling us that the models do not weigh marine influence very accurately?

  4. 4 minutes ago, weathafella said:

    Like days of old....1960-61 vibe for that.   Of course Euro severely cuts the 10th way way west which you would think wouldn't happen with the 7th wound up but GFS more or less ignored the 7th and is signaling a colder solution for the 10th.

    Yeah, that 10th storm could cause some real flooding problems with that snowpack.

×
×
  • Create New...