Jump to content

TheClimateChanger

Members
  • Posts

    1,882
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TheClimateChanger

  1. Key takeaway is this will be heavily elevation dependent. Might be difficult to get any accumulation downtown, while some of the more elevated neighborhoods might pick up a half inch. Taken literally, some of the global models do have a few inches in the city but I'd lean towards the mesoscale modeling in this situation. The official observation site will probably see some accumulating snow later, maybe 0.5-1.5 inches. Best chance of 2"+ looks to be in the northeastern parts of the area - northern Butler, Armstrong, Indiana, Venango, Forest, Clarion and Jefferson Counties. The higher totals to the north are partly a function of elevation, and partly a function of the fact that the precipitation lingers longer there into the evening and overnight. The ridges could see much more than the official forecast if the modeling is correct.

  2. Interestingly the NAM 3K is showing nearly 30" in parts of Tucker County, while they are under a WWA for up to 4 inches. Not much for Pittsburgh city on the Kuchera ratio map, although that's a bit misleading as that is one of the lowest numbers in the metro area due to elevation and urban heat island. The numbers are placed right over the cities and not the airport locations where the obs are taken. Most places are shown in the 1-2" range, including around the airport. More to the northeast where the precipitation lasts longer after the changeover to snow. This is the Kuchera map which generally is less than the 10:1 map, although it might be a bit more in some of the ridge locations.

    image.thumb.png.78d954c8be133f4a7828d4fdabeb91ae.png

  3. 1 hour ago, north pgh said:

    One criticism of NWS Pittsburgh. They talk about the snow squall warning system but I have not seen any this winter when there should have been at times. Most of central Pa is under warnings currently by state college and have done it other times this winter. We have had several already with whiteout conditions and cars having to pull over until it passes. If near zero visibility and 40 mph winds even for 5 minutes doesn't warrant one then what does?

    I do recall a couple earlier in the winter along the I-80 corridor. NWS PBZ doesn't seem too keen on them - maybe because of the EAS activation? The ones I recall seeing them issue were near the interstate, so maybe they prefer to limit them to particularly dangerous interstate corridors?

  4. 12 minutes ago, KPITSnow said:

    I feel like you could tell around midnight this had a great chance of pushing 6 inches.

    Not a huge deal, but I agree should have been upgraded.

    Agreed. Read my post at the time. I would also disagree that the models supported 3-6" by 00z last evening. The consensus was more like 5-7 inches. The GFS, which I posted in this thread, showed 8.3 inches for Pittsburgh.

    But I thought it looked pretty clear that we would easily pass the low end of that range by like 2 am, and be pushing the high end by 4-5 am unless the snow started to fizzle out. I mean there was already 2" or so by 1 am, with what looked to be an absolute monster of a band from near Zanesville to Clarion. 40+ dbz were showing up in Beaver County. And snowfall rates under the lighter colors were already approaching an inch per hour, so it was obvious there would be some 2" per hour rates under that mega band.

    • Like 1
  5. 25 minutes ago, meatwad said:
    000
    NWUS51 KPBZ 121217
    LSRPBZ
    
    PRELIMINARY LOCAL STORM REPORT
    NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PITTSBURGH PA
    717 AM EST SAT MAR 12 2022
    
    ..TIME...   ...EVENT...      ...CITY LOCATION...     ...LAT.LON...
    ..DATE...   ....MAG....      ..COUNTY LOCATION..ST.. ...SOURCE....
                ..REMARKS..
    
    0717 AM     SNOW             1 N CARNOT-MOON         40.53N  80.22W
    03/12/2022  M7.5 INCH        ALLEGHENY          PA   OFFICIAL NWS OBS
    
                7.5 AT OFFICE IN MOON AS OF 7A
    
    
    &&
    
    EVENT NUMBER PBZ2201885
    
    $$
    
    JL
    

     

    What the heck? How has the advisory still not been upgraded to a warning?

  6. KYNG 120451Z 29007KT 3/4SM -SN BR OVC007 M02/M04 A2982 RMK AO2 SLP106 SNINCR 1/2 P0010 T10221039 401111039 RVRNO $

    METAR from 11:51 pm at YNG shows 1" in the last hour, with 2" already on the ground there. Judging by radar over the past 45 minutes, I would expect them to report another inch with the upcoming METAR. I think they were only expected to get 2-4 inches.

    Looks to be heavier than expected. Wonder if the NWS will upgrade to a warning?

    • Like 1
  7. 1 hour ago, TimB said:

    18z long range HRRR that shows the whole storm I would guess should look better than 12z. The last few hourly runs have trended up through hour 18.

    Edit: it’s keeping hope alive for a high end advisory event.

    All modeling looks pretty good for a 4-5" snow now. The 12z Euro had over 5" with 10:1 ratios - would definitely support 6,7" with actual ratios if that plays out correctly. The 12z UKMet was nearly 4" at 10:1, would again be a bit more than that with ratios. All seem to be roughly in line with the GFS and Canadian.

    The only real holdout at 12z was the NAM 3K - which taken literally threw up a 2.2" in downtown Pittsburgh. But it looks like it's overdosing on microscale effects (topography, etc.). If you look closely, it has 4-5 inches in far western Allegheny out towards the airport. Not really realistic for the airport to double the city's total with this setup IMO. Looks like it's just overdoing the microscale effects, and smoothed out a bit would be a 3-5" storm areawide. Which is in line with what the 12Z NAM12K was showing.

×
×
  • Create New...