It’d be a lot easier to say “something isn’t right” if it weren’t for that pesky 3 at HLG, where the elevation, latitude, and climo are remarkably similar to PIT’s. The location of AGC is a bit more firmly within the UHI area, which would conceivably lead to a few more 90 degree days in what has been an above normal temperature summer. My question (and maybe yours) isn’t whether or not PIT’s data is bad, but whether PIT is representative of the greater Pittsburgh area, and it very well may not be. But to change that now would render the past 70 years of data moot and not able to be compared to data going forward. And 1952-2022 is unfortunately a pretty critical part of the climate record.