Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    90,911
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. Nice tick west on 06z euro. The shortwave definitely has been looking nice on the 06z runs. Hopefully that Carries into the 12z suite.
  2. Glad I went to bed early last night…I just got caught up reading like 3 pages melting down about the 00z NAM. Some of you need to go back to spring training…lol. Luke wins the prize for best prediction by saying the the 06z NAM would come in zonked. Looking at other guidance, I really like the strength of the shortwave. The 06z suite is coming in strong with it. Hopefully euro follows in a bit.
  3. Jan 2019 was pretty impressive. ORH had a high of 1F. Had to go back to 1994 to get that. Even Jan 2004 didn’t beat that.
  4. Here's H5 on the RGEM....you can see how nicely the vort is curling up into ACY area (and eventually LI) and it's tight enough that there's good downstream ridging....it's a bit more efficient in that department than the 18z NAM which is why the RGEM was a big hit and the NAM was more of a moderate event.
  5. It came in shallower angle like Tip mentioned. It does go negative with the trough sooner but the trough itself isn't quite as deep. But the overall look is pretty nice....you have the vort curling up from the Delmarva into LI and then the Cape....that is a classic scenario for midlevel goodies over SNE.
  6. Regardless of any actual trends in the height field or vortmax, I do think the storm circulation will end up tucked a bit closer to the max PVA than some of these runs show. If you get your conveyor all mucked up chasing convection, then you'll have some uglier looking solutions that may or may not be model phantoms. Sometimes the convection is correct...but I'd be leery of it, especially on hyrdostatic model guidance. That said, there are multiple other factors such as the heights in SE Canada which are important for ridging downstream of the shortwave and of course, the shortwave itself. Then you have the western ridge too as Tip and Chris have already discussed a few times.
  7. Yeah you want to see that ridging poking further north into Quebec, but in my experience, model guidance tends to underestimate the ultimate strength of these consolidated vortmaxes and associated amplification. Maybe it doesn't happen this time, but I'd be somewhat surprised if we don't start seeing a bit of a shift back west all else equal. If we get more confluence up north, then obviously that would offset a stronger vortmax.
  8. It won;t melt if there's a decent warning criteria storm...if we only get 2-3" of blower fluff, then yeah, it might.
  9. Single digit highs for 1/11 on Euro in SNE....below 0F in NNE. Cold stuff....not since Jan 2019.
  10. It's pretty damned potent vortmax. Unless it weakens a decent amount, my guess is future guidance starts reacting to it by tucking this thing closer to the PVA.
  11. Prob a modest tickle east...though it wouldn't surprise me if it basically held serve since it was already a little bit east.
  12. Yeah I'm still thinking this comes back west some...they usually do when you have that nice consolidated vort energy near base of trough and when there's some sfc reflection chasing convection. We actually saw this somewhat in the 12/17/20 storm last winter. We're obviously dealing with an eastward trend this 12z cycle, but there's still plenty of cycles left.
  13. The western crowd had some good storms in the 1990s and early 2000s....they can wait another decade before the worm turns.
  14. Yeah I was looking at H5 first on Reggie and was thinking that would be more tucked...it hammers SE MA pretty good, but my guess is that would be better further west than it actually shows.
×
×
  • Create New...