-
Posts
93,095 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by ORH_wxman
-
Given how uncertain LR forecasting is, the math becomes less and less useful and learning to analyze, quality-check, and weight data becomes a lot more important. There is definitely a bit of art to LR forecasting. The physics/math seems to become more important in shorter term forecasts where we have a lot more certainty on certain parameters....like, I can say "jesus, there is a 75 knot low-level jet slamming into a dead calm cold dome over the interior.....I don't care what certain QPF forecasts look like, someone is going to get a fronto death band". But even these days, the models have gotten so much better, you don't have to augment them as much as we did 15 years ago. Back in the late-aughts, we still had model guidance that would print a half inch of QPF in the cold sector of a coastal when you had dynamics that would easily support double that and we had to tell everyone to stop being QPF queens. Nowadays, the discrepancies aren't as large, though they obviously still do exist.
-
It's going to be hard to run a correlation on temps alone that mean much.....mostly because the Antarctic SPV was affected by the ozone hole for so long which cooled the stratosphere down there. So you are prob going to get an inverse correlation for the rest of the globe.....which can be explained by that. If we could somehow remove that influence, it would be helpful.
-
Yeah that was an ugly Ukie run...+EPO/NAO pattern....woof. Prob something like '98-99 or '99-'00.
-
What model ensemble is that? That NAO looks pretty ridiculous.
-
Update: On 9/6, NSIDC SIA fell to 3.2 million sq km...this puts 2022 slightly below 2018's 3.23 million sq km minimum. The low concentration ice near the pole has yet to refreeze which allowed the losses on the periphery to add up enough to pass 2018. The next one on the list is 2021 which had a min of 3.16 million sq km. As for extent, the NSIDC extent is currently at 4.85 million sq km. We'll see how much lower this goes in the next few days...we haven't had a min above 4.8 million sq km since 2014 (though last year was close at 4.72 million sq km). My guess is we drop below 4.8 million sq km and perhaps below last year as well, but no guarantees.
-
Yes agreed....that would be frigid in Canada with that H5 pattern....and hopefully we'd get some better timing to allow for more SWFEs and keeping the cold locked into New England over the top. Hopefully we see that Aleutian ridge beef up a little more on future runs which would help push the cold a little further south.
-
No it was mostly rain into the Berkshires too except a bit of snow at the onset. I think the high terrain of VT/NH got at least some paste in that one. You might be thinking of the 2/24/10 storm. That one crushed ORH county back to the Berkshires. MPM had like 2 feet. I had about a foot in ORH before it mixed while 495 eastward had zilch. Then the retro-rainstorm the next day ruined a lot of it but it changed back to snow pretty quickly in the Berkshires and they picked up another 10-15”. I think even Hubbdave got another 8-10” too and I couldn’t believe it since I wasn’t that far from him but only got 2-3” after it flipped back.
-
New thread link
-
We don’t do droughts very well in New England. It’s like trying to get a deep cold/snowy winter in Virginia or North Carolina outside of the mountains.
