ORH_wxman

Still has an outside shot, but you need to really thread the needle to make it interesting....if that shortwave rides up over the ridge really far north, it will then maybe be in decent position when it gets shunted southeast. But my hedge at the moment is this is a whiff.

There's been a lot of different versions of poo-pooing so hard to say how to parse them.... 1. One version was obsessing over the timing. Like if it didn't flip by Dec 8th, it was a huge bust. "we're going to lose most of early December!!!" 2. Another version was "it's a horrible pattern for the next 3 weeks". Not sure where that came other than "Feels" from but it's been posted in this thread. 3. The most reasonable pessimists IMHO have been the ones probably along the coast who understand their climo sucks in early December anyway and were worried about arctic cold being available...so that when the model guidance ticked somewhat warmer, it was game over for them even with a strong NAO block. This shouldn't really change anyone's perception in the interior, but for the coast I can see the worry. I think some of the worry has been a little overblown though even along the coast. If you get a high in the right area, even a relatively marginal airmass will prob snow to the coast except maybe right on the beaches.

He needs to confess first to the November pattern change sins...

All the other guidance keep the block and then retrograde it back into Davis Strait/Baffin area and re-strengthen it temporarily as the Dec 9-11 ridging to the north of that system feeds into it.....then it spins in the west-based region slowly decaying. GFS just disintegrates the block and never rebuilds it after Dec 10th and instead the heights fall over Greeland/Baffin and a monster ridge builds in the east.

GFS suite has been downright bizarre in how it handles the NAO block the past few runs. Def does not match the GEPS/EPS evolution. It's not even a block at all after about day 4-5.

Yeah a lot of guidance is showing that. Moisture is trapped mostly below 800mb in that look, but with 850 temps getting into the -6C or -7C range, there is likely going to be snow growth in that lower level, so could be some steady SN- inland if it sets up like that. But obviously the models seem to be really struggling with that entire evolution, so hard to take anything without a grain of salt at the moment.

Irony is that the PAC is looking pretty decent by D10 on that 12z run.

12z GGEM has a significantly different evolution for weekend/early next week....it has a little PV lobe pinned to our north and sort of focuses more on the follow up wave on 12/12 instead of 12/10. It has 12/10 initially pretty far north but then gets put through the meat grinder and we see more action from the follow up 12/12 wave. It also has Tip's 12/14 storm as a SWFE/front ender.

Every pattern has examples of taking a while to produce or producing right away. This one is no different. Models did rush the retrograding of the SE ridge by about 4 days....normally a fairly trivial error. If it weren't early season when everyone is predictably impatient, the melts would probably be about half of what we're seeing.

GFS feeling the crunch for Dec 10th....makes sense though as it was an outlier for the past 3-4 cycles. Now starting to trend toward other guidance.

Lol....yeah, making ironclad proclamations is great for sales, but not so great in forecasting. Same goes for those who are convinced we're screwed too. Seeing an awful lot of certainty in some posts while simultaneously complaining about the unreliability of model guidance.

I wouldn’t be that worried over the interior outside of typical normal storm track worries. There will be enough cold around on favorable storm tracks. Immediate coast will have more issues.

I really like the EPS for New England. Maybe not as great south of here. I don’t really have a reason to poo-poo the below patterns…lack of arctic cold might be a worry in very coastal exposed spots like the Cape and south coast.

Outside of the GFS, not much supporting precip for 12/9-10. Id expect GFS to come considerably more suppressed today with that one. Still a chance there’s a compromise on models where we thread the needle and get a bit of snow but I’m expecting a whiff at this point. Sig for 12/13-14 is pretty solid on ensemble guidance so we’ll just have to wait and see how that one evolves.

That’s even more suppressed. South of DC.

GFS is def an outlier with the Dec 9-10-11 system. Even compared to NAM. You can see how much more suppressed the flow is even on that model near the end.

The 1.7 on 12/8 looks good. No idea where the 8.5 on 12/7 came from.

Doubt it.

Middle finger into YBY In all seriousness. There are going to be multiple shots at something as has been mentioned previously.

Get a little more cold press ahead of that system and it could be a pretty big deal in interior SNE. It does eventually change over there but if it can do it 12 hours earlier…watch out. Still might end up getting squashed though.

Next system was run out of your basement.

One of those is Jan 1969. That was tough luck. edit: I was 30 seconds too late. Lol

I think more than that have committed. Aren’t you already in? I know Ray, Scooter and I are in too. I am pretty sure a few others committed too.

Looks like Feb ‘69. So like 39 and change?