Makes me wonder if the Bermuda storm will cause the ridge to pump up stronger and to the west, thus increasing the chances for the second TC to hug the coast rather than safely go out to sea SE of us.
Okay so according to the second key point, there are suites of the GFS run without the GFDL? Why dont we just use those? Or if there aren't, why not make a para GFS that doesn't use GFDL microphysics and run that parallel to the current GFS and we can compare them to each other and give preference to the one that's more accurate?
why dont they fix this cold bias? Isn't this as simple as applying a positive (+) temperature correction to the data? Simply do a study to see what the magnitude of the cold bias is and adjust the model to account for it?
The GND is very thorough in addressing the many problems we face as a society, from the antiquated land use policy that is driving the current mass extinction to the unhealthy high meat/processed food diet that is driving the high rates of diabetes and obesity and the worst BMI in the world, to the problems of plastic pollution that are ubiquitous worldwide. The IPCC has stated we must cut fossil fuel usage by half by 2030 to avoid irreversible consequences and even that may be too conservative, as the damage we've already caused is expected to stick with us for thousands of years.
Humanity has a horrible history of driving species to extinction throughout their history. What a tragic legacy.
https://www.livescience.com/first-human-caused-animal-extinction.html
https://www.livescience.com/53822-dodo-birds-were-smart.html
https://www.livescience.com/earth-without-people.html#xenforo-comments-3341
They even lied and tried to blame the species themselves for their own extinction by saying they were stupid when they clearly weren't.
I liked the last piece the most, how long it will take for the planet to recover from the mess we've caused when humanity finally goes extinct.
I hope they hinder sales in regions vulnerable to wild fires too.
How long until we get some legislation preventing people from buying property in these climate vulnerable areas?
a well funded EPA that doesn't employ people who are part of the industries they are supposed to be regulating (we could also say that about the FDA and other regulatory agencies.)
More advanced wind turbines have built in computers that shut down individual units when birds approach. This problem is going to lessen with new tech.