Jump to content

HillsdaleMIWeather

Members
  • Posts

    3,560
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HillsdaleMIWeather

  1. 15 hours ago, cyclone77 said:

    Not surprised to see the lack of a marginal for parts of Iowa/southern WI/north IL for tomorrow, as forecasters like to stay consistent day to day.  Broyles went with a general thunder for those areas for day2, as he had done on day3, which will be a mistake.  In subsequent forecasts a marginal will likely be added by a different forecaster.  It's possible a slight might eventually be needed as well, as there is sufficient shear and instability for organized severe.  Question is just how much of it.  Simulated radar from 3km NAM shows some scattered activity.  Nice little vort is well timed, and should provide some additional lift.  Surface flow looks to remain fairly backed ahead of the front, with fairly decent shear in the lower 3km.  

    You were right

    • Like 1
  2. 22 minutes ago, jojo762 said:

    00Z 12NAM = pretty good.

    Early convection isn’t an issue in this run, resulting in ~1000J/KG CAPE, along with sustantial bulk and low-level shear... I’ll let you imagination do the rest of the thinking there...

    00Z 3km NAM = meh.

    Tons of morning and early afternoon crapvection across Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky. As andyhb mentioned, still could be some potential further south, but instability looks pretty mediocre on this run until you get into AL/MS. Any storms in between Indiana and Mississippi would be absolutely torn apart by this level of shear (60-70+ kt 0-6km) with <1000J/KG CAPE. Fwiw, definitely a VBV signature being shown between the 800-600mb layer in the aforementioned southern target, providing questions over storm modes there despite a relatively better environment compared to the northern target.

     

    Still waiting for more guidance but not feeling particularly sure in any one solution at this point. Either going to be a crapfest or an impressive day imo. Leaning more toward crapfest given that HRRR has been sticking toward more of a 00Z 3NAM solution for quite a while (even though the HRRR regularly over does convection).

    02 HRRR took a step back in the right direction

  3. 12 minutes ago, BrandonC_TX said:

    18z HRRR shows no lack of warmth ahead of the front.  There's a lot of SRH shown over the warm sector and mid-60s to lower-70s temperatures with dewpoints modeled in the upper 50s to lower 60s across western and central Ohio.  If storm mode can remain discrete (and sufficient cloud breaks occur as previously mentioned) it seems that the potential for tornadoes is there.  Looks promising provided that everything comes together just right.  That said, the NAM3K is a bit less aggressive with destabilization.

    I know the HRRR can be a bit overdone at times, though.  It is also showing pockets of high temperatures in the lower 80s over western WV, SW PA, and SE OH, though this area is not under the moist axis (temperatures under the moist axis are generally being modeled in the 60s to near 70 at best).  The HRW models and the NAM 3k (the other CAM models available on pivotalweather.com) are at least somewhat consistent on a temperature spike into at least the mid-70s occurring over this region, though.

    Considering the high res models have the dew points lower than they actually are right now, the higher numbers might happen.

  4. Considering a sizable chunk of the subforum is now under a Slight Risk with Enhanced being considered, good time for a thread.

    
     

    swody2_categorical.png

    ..LOWER OHIO VALLEY VICINITY    

    A STRONG SOUTH/SOUTHWESTERLY LOW LEVEL JET WILL TRANSPORT GULF   MOISTURE FAIRLY FAR NORTHWARD FOR THIS TIME OF YEAR, WITH AT LEAST A   NARROW CORRIDOR OF LOW 60S F DEWPOINTS AS FAR NORTH AS THE LOWER   OHIO RIVER, AND LOW-TO-MID 50S F DEWPOINTS INTO SOUTHERN MICHIGAN.   WHILE THE BETTER QUALITY MOISTURE WILL REMAIN CONFINED TO THE DEEP   SOUTH, FORCING FOR ASCENT AND DEEP LAYER SHEAR ARE MUCH MORE   IMPRESSIVE FROM THE OHIO VALLEY INTO SOUTHERN MI. ADDITIONALLY,   MIDLEVEL LAPSE RATES ARE EXPECTED TO STEEPEN FROM KY/IN INTO MI AS   STRONGER HEIGHT FALLS AND COLDER TEMPERATURES ALOFT OVERSPREAD THE   REGION AHEAD OF A MIDLEVEL DRYSLOT BY MIDDAY.     ALL OF THIS COMBINED LEADS TO A NARROW WARM SECTOR CHARACTERIZED BY   500-1000 J/KG MLCAPE, 6.5-7.5 C/KM MIDLEVEL LAPSE RATES,   IMPRESSIVE/LARGE CURVED LOW LEVEL HODOGRAPHS AND 45+ KT EFFECTIVE   SHEAR. WHILE THIS PARAMETER SPACE IS MORE THAN CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING   WIDESPREAD SEVERE, INCLUDING DAMAGING WINDS AND POSSIBLE STRONG   TORNADOES, QUITE A BIT OF UNCERTAINTY STILL EXISTS. THIS IS DUE IN   PART TO SEVERAL ROUNDS OF SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS EXPECTED IN THE   DAY 1/WED PERIOD, WITH ONGOING CONVECTION POSSIBLE IN WARM ADVECTION   REGIME AT THE START OF THE DAY 2/THU PERIOD. IMPACTS OF THIS   CONVECTION/RESIDUAL CLOUD COVER ON DESTABILIZATION, AND HOW   FAR/QUICKLY THE SURFACE COLD FRONT PROGRESSES BY THURSDAY MORNING   MAKES FOR A QUITE CONDITIONAL SCENARIO. AS A RESULT, HAVE OPTED TO   EXPAND THE SLIGHT RISK NORTHWARD ACROSS THE MID-SOUTH INTO SOUTHERN   MI. UNCERTAINTY AND CONDITIONAL NATURE OF THE THREAT WILL PRECLUDE   HIGHER PROBS AT THIS TIME ACROSS PARTS OF KY/IN/MI/OH, BUT POTENTIAL   CERTAINLY EXISTS FOR A HIGHER-END THREAT TO MATERIALIZE ACROSS THIS   REGION, AS IMPLIED BY VARIOUS CAMS IN THE 18-00Z TIME FRAME.   OBSERVATIONAL AND NUMERICAL GUIDANCE TRENDS WILL BE MONITORED   CLOSELY.  

  5. 39 minutes ago, Jackstraw said:

    NE IN, NW OH, far SEMI may be getting the worse of the ice overnight, possible 1 inch amounts.  Nice moisture plume should over run the area in the next 4-6 hours with sub freezing surface temps.  I'd be real concerned for some severe icing in those areas.

    Agreed, ice and winds are picking up here

  6. 3 hours ago, Chinook said:

    Hmm. The NAM-3km and the GFS both have over 0.25" of ice accumulation for Toledo, but, as of yet, there has been no W.W.A. or W.S.W. issued for the southern tier of counties in Michigan or I-80 tier of counties in Indiana and Ohio. Maybe they are holding off due to uncertainty in impact, possible temperatures above freezing.

    IWX says they're not planning to issue ANY headlines

×
×
  • Create New...