Jump to content

Maestrobjwa

Members
  • Posts

    8,737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Maestrobjwa

  1. Mentally I've been thinking 6-8" with a slight chance of an upside if things really lined up. I'd be good with that...will be disappointed if it busts lower though.
  2. But my question is why did it cut...timing? Late transfer?
  3. If the 18z were to happen, that would be the real bust here...because that would take a 5-8" prospect along the beltway and turn it into slush! Hope it's wrong! Now...what is making the primary get tucked in like that? (and what do we need to change it?
  4. Teased by what, exactly? If ya believed in 12-18"...that may have been your interpretation of that that teased you...
  5. Yeah no other model has been transferring that late...so it appears to be on an island.
  6. I think we even had that in Jan 2016! I mean everything went about as perfectly as it can go for that storm!
  7. Wouldn't let my mind go there if I were you...and just remember it's the ICON, lol Let's just see what happens in the next suite...then we can discuss blip or trend
  8. So I guess the only "rug getting pulled out" scenario would be a further west track at this point?...
  9. Yeah and so far the high moving away too quickly hasn't been too much of an issue on the rest of the guidance...
  10. Darn...don't wanna see that become a thing...
  11. That was a golden week right there...ain't never seen consensus from like 7-8 days out be that rock-steady!
  12. #Jan2016...aka easiest tracking ever. But it's kinda rare!
  13. Even if ya cut that in half for the usual caveats...what would that be...8"+ even for the cities?
  14. Now what would have to happen to make it go a tad SE?Just a little less amped on Wednesday? (or is this a double-edged sword...and that we don't want less amped because ya want the rates?)
  15. And add to that the possibility of CAD being undermodeled (as it sometimes is)...and that's a pretty great run!!
  16. Warning level is my bar too...I haven't had one verify imby since 2016, so...I'd take 5-8"! I am curious about what the ceiling will be though...
  17. Looks like it follows the @psuhoffman theory!
  18. Good!! Amp that baby up to help with Wednesday!
  19. Yeah he was being mostly sarcastic with that comment...lol
  20. Could you elaborate a bit more (not that you haven't already done a lot elaborating of course!) about how the stonger CAD signature would impact on what you just mentioned about with the "warm nose" this run of the euro showed?
  21. So this run was more about track than any other factor?
  22. Now with the 1035 high overhead...is the track what caused the slightly warmer solution?
×
×
  • Create New...