Jump to content

Maestrobjwa

Members
  • Posts

    10,274
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Maestrobjwa

  1. You'd hope that getting positive improvements on all three globals would be a good sign for tomorrow...we shall see
  2. But isn't it more of a hybrid on the CMC run? I mean the phasing still starts south of us instead of at our latitude like a lot of Miller Bs do
  3. Ack! Now I'm even more disorientated (yes I'm mispelling that on purpose)...but I'll take it that this is a pummelin', lol
  4. I was gonna say...to my novice eyes, trough looked like it went more negative (that's the "V" shape, right?) a littler earlier, no?
  5. I think they were absolutely gassed by the time they got to those last two drives....mercy!
  6. And all of this...started with an provoked remark of which I have no clue what, if anything, I said wrong this time. But after a couple responses I just stepped back and watched it disintegrate, lol
  7. Oh wow is it's that much of a pain? Lol Why?
  8. Cooper Cupp HAS to get MVP...but of course they don't give it to receivers, smh
  9. I have no idea what was wrong with what I just posted, smh You tell me. If you have no constructive criticism, buzz off
  10. Wondering what our window is to start seeing such a change on modeling...
  11. I beg to differ...got any records? Our biggest storms have been As not Bs!
  12. And he's literally liar liar pants on fire, lol
  13. Color me skeptical...that kind of thing almost never seems to pan out (except maybe a flurry or two). Of course I could've be biased...as I'm stickin' with the prediction that we either get 1-2' or nothing at all, lol
  14. How would that work, though? Don't Miller B's usually leave us in the hole almost completely? (except for the western half of the subforum that can get the WAA). I'm not sure we've had one that even squeezed out 2-4, lol
  15. Quite frankly...and maybe I'm a bit early with this, but so far it's stsrting to look like there are only two possibilities here: A) We get absolute nailed with 1-2+ feet or b) We see nothing at all--no backened inches, no snow to rain/mix...like literally all or nothing! That's my story and I'm stickin' to it...lol (unless we see the models a not impossible in-between solution)
  16. Unfortunately you can tell at hour 78. We are running out of time if this stablizes Well thankfully NOTHING is stabilized...seeing as we've seen like 4 different outcomes the last 4 runs, lol
  17. Man how long have you been tracking snow? This is how Day 6/7 modeling goes, dang it!
  18. Even at that point...I don't understand the "again"...like, what? After 2013-14 and 2014-15? Lol We were practically on a heater before that!
  19. Gotta wonder if a little less confluence would be a net positive here given some of the other more suppressed/late phase solutions...
×
×
  • Create New...