Jump to content

PackGrad05

Members
  • Posts

    1,564
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PackGrad05

  1. 16 minutes ago, FallsLake said:

    Funny thing about the 6z NAM, it was actually colder at the surface (..dew points) then 0z. There was just less precip to start the event. 

    So we're starting to get the colder look, we need to also focus on the start time/amounts of precip. 

    I Just took a closer look at the 3K NAM precip depiction.  As the precipitation moves in, you can see a "blank" spot in the shape of the wedge over central NC.  Could the model be picking up on the moisture not overcoming the initial dry air in place?  If so, how well is that normally forecasted in models?

  2. 1 hour ago, tarheelwx said:

    With its performance beyond 5 days, it is ludicrous to think you’d replace any model with the FV3. It has repeatedly shown big storms for central NC in the 6-14 range that the others have not shown for the most part.  Maybe I’m just judging my mby, but it’s been terrible.  Way too cold with cold and wintry weather.  Has it performed better elsewhere?

    TW 

    I want to say the FV3 handled the December storm pretty well... We were tracking it for 7-10 days and it never really wavered.  

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...