40/70 Benchmark
-
Posts
73,328 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark
-
Almost like 2004-2005. I'd take it... -
Sums this winter up perfectly...the couple of times you due hook up with a hot chick, there is a fat thug named Bruno in the alley waiting to have his way with you...
-
He smashes Bryce's bike and tosses it into the wind, and away it flies..like the movie Twister
-
Glad we shed the NJ coast tuckies
-
Nice cluster of 980s just se of ACK....
-
Dude, we are 6 days out....perhaps the model is overdoing it.
-
I had already told you that it captured later..what more did you need to know? lol
-
No, they have less snow bc of the down slope on an easterly fetch. You should know that.
-
I feel like generally speaking there is less resistance to cutters in December, than later in the year.
-
Exactly my point...better for you. I'd take 12z.
-
It does to me.
-
That EPS is perfect.
-
It took a step east, and later w the capture...sound familiar? (Runs)
-
Looks like a late capture.
-
How? WTF happened, the Hadley Cell eat it?
-
Where the hell is that useless arctic load that everyone was raving about as an antecedent airmass? Back to the same Groundhog day, thermal crap, scenario that we had in Dec and Jan. All we heard about was how "no issues w baroclinicty or gradients now"....lo and behold....
-
Now,. if the model is too warm....different issue. But it will most accurately convey what the data is trying to disseminate in relation to snowfall output IMO. If the model is wrong because it is too warm, then the output will be wrong.
-
TBH, I only noticed those freezing layers recently....the snowfall maps are the best, IMO, for resolving thermal snowfall gradients. Like Steve and Kevin will tell you, it isn't perfect...but it isn't prone to those idotic glitches that add up snow at least excuse imaginable. It was also miss mid level deformation because...well, the model does.
-
I agree....we may be starting to get locked into that, though, by this point....its been consistent. What causes that?
-
I'd rather tighten it and risk a favorable track.
-
Its been the most accurate to my recollection. Is the model too warm? Possible...
-
Oh, I know....
-
For some, I guess....
-
Negative. The model is hopefully a bit warm in the low levels, though.
