Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    67,801
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 2 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

    Yep.  That was determined on Sunday

    Its a Jedi-mind track...he is inconspicuously asking if anyone thinks he still has a shot without asking. :lol: He is hoping to real in a big kahuna like Scooter or Will.....not a sunfish like Steve, who is always smiling.

    • Haha 4
  2. 5 minutes ago, dendrite said:

    Cloud tops still look cold enough even when the nam pulls a little dry air into s nh at h7. Just need to get the forcing to overcome your 2m temps. I should be ok up here. 

    God, my latitude is right on the razor's edge....plenty of instances where it has killed me as Scooter and Will frolicked in knee deep snow....just once I would like the inverse.

  3. 4 minutes ago, Chrisrotary12 said:

    These are the type of systems where 9 times out of 10 you leave them underwhelmed because the models printed out 12”+ and you ended up with 3” because sleet, crappy rates, etc. 

    Exactly...."complicated" and "bizzarre" imply ambiguity and that doesn't bode well at a time of year when you need everything just about perfect. I think this is why you can't find a single pro, including the NWS, forecsting much of any accumulation anywhere in SNE/CNE.

    Last March is fresh in my mind.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  4. 1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

    Because it's not the final solution. Certainly it doesn't bode well for borderline areas but subtle changes (in either direction) could be huge. 

    Yea, to me relying on convection for a positive break when the model that supposedly has the best handle on it has the shittiest solution doesn't inspire much hope.

  5. 3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    I think he is just excited about the convection in the midwest and knows that no one in this thread would care (the severe thread is undoubtedly a morgue), so he's obfuscating.

    The UCONN fans call into Felger and Mazz and do this....they know that no one here gives a rat's ass, so they try to inconspicuously find a way to link it to one of the major 4 sports teams and Felger roasts them :lol:

    • Haha 1
  6. 4 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

    gotcha...should have been more clear. Meant it could be good for those riding the line as it at least keeps them in the game, it doesn't completely end hope (accounting for the possibility of more favorable ticks). 

    But if the NAM has the best handle on the convection....and it is furthest north and warmest, why does the keep me in the game???

  7. 17 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

    The NAM may be the way to go with this. It's doing a damn good job I think with the handling of the convection and evolution of the convection across the Ohio Valley. The NAM is quite scary today with the extent of the potential for severe weather and strong tornadoes. If the convection today becomes as robust as the NAM indicates that is good news for the interior and maybe for areas that are borderline currently. 

     

    Just now, weatherwiz said:

    Well I guess it depends on perspective/expectations :lol: 

    Someone somewhere is going to get whacked pretty good, unfortunately it's probably a small amount of people and a very small percent of the forum so I can understand the excitement may not be high. 

    But at least from a meteorological perspective, this is going to be a blast to watch unfold. Storms like this though are a phenomenal learning tool. I wish in school there was a class or course (maybe there is in grad school) then was dedicated to studying historical storms. Just watching how everything evolves, interacts, and how all the processes involved lead to the evolution...anyone interested in forecasting could substantially boost their knowledge from these systems. 

    You aren't making any sense....you are implying that the NAM has the best handle and it would be good news for those riding the line if it is right, but its the most northern and lame solution for those on the line....then when asked, you admit that it would only be good for the moose.

  8. 10 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

    The NAM may be the way to go with this. It's doing a damn good job I think with the handling of the convection and evolution of the convection across the Ohio Valley. The NAM is quite scary today with the extent of the potential for severe weather and strong tornadoes. If the convection today becomes as robust as the NAM indicates that is good news for the interior and maybe for areas that are borderline currently. 

    Then why does the NAM solution blow?

  9. 35 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

    Wouldn’t that be the southern periphery? If everybody north of you is increasing/getting more…wouldn’t that put you on the southern periphery? Just trying to picture what you mean? 

    Northern periphery of BOX overage area...southern periphery of snow shield.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...