Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    73,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. Yes. Central based can take on characteristics of both east and west based events.
  2. Yea, I feel like through the goal posts if it develops appreciably.. I don't think its much of a threat to the US.
  3. July and August were brutal, but I guess since the peak of Mt. Washington recorded a freezing temp in June and September, my ass didn't swamp throughout July and August.
  4. People are desperate for something meteorologically intriguing to take place....duck for cover when OTS is favored lol
  5. Agree...I go back to 1950. I think we all understand that the globe has warmed....I don't think anyone using an analog from the 60's would expect it to be as cold today given an identical global evolution. Using 1951-2010 as the base climo period alleviates that issue, somewhat.
  6. Yea, no brainer that will rise...it had to because it couldn't really get any lower. I'll do another blog next week.
  7. Same....like I said, it felt good viewing a model for the first time since early March.
  8. If you considered ENSO intensity in a vacuum, I absolutely agree. Hopefully in this day and age no one is doing that.
  9. Another analog that I really like is 1956-1957...that will be up there on my list.
  10. That is my early favorite for winter '23-'24......caveat for raindance, not at all a forecast at this point, so don't grade it. Back to this year, there is one year that I really like that is an absolutely exceptional match in terms of summer precip, okay for summer temps, and great match in terms of ACE and solar. Main flaws of this year: - While decent, the summer temp match is not great - QBO is off, as its easterly...but not a huge deal. - While it is another basin wide la nina, its focused a bit further to the east...like 2010-2011, so couple all of that with climate change, and it would be a modified version. Anyway, as we all know, analogs are a tool and never meant to imply a replica season. But this goes along with the theme for a big December and fast start.
  11. That year has some strengths, but there is another one that I like even better....much better temp/precip match to this past summer, and also a better fit in terms of ACE value.
  12. Totally see that....the next winter I see as very similar to 2002-2003, both in terms of intensity and structure. As Raindance so eloquently pointed out, at the inception of this thread I speculated that it would be this coming season, but as it turns out it will be the next one. That became clear once I picked back up tracking ENSO early in the summer.
  13. Yes, been saying I'll decide once and for all whether to really follow it or not this weekend.
  14. 1) It must remain weak enough to avoid recurving, while still maintaining its overall integrity, a task which is made a bit taller by the fact that a weaker, more westward tracking system is more likely to interact with Hispaniola. 2) The way I see this is that there is a pretty narrow path to major US impacts considering that a it must thread the need in limiting interaction with the Greater Antilles, while also avoiding re-curvature. I feel like the ceiling for US impact is a TS, with perhaps a slight risk of a minimal cane....which fits my definition of ignorable. I know others may disagree.
  15. Still seems like a largely ignorable tropical entity IMO.
  16. The irony is that he claimed that we spend so much time on a weather forum because we are socially inept and fear direct social contact, when the reality is that we spend so much time here because we have all met in person and developed friendships over the years as a result of our shared passion for the weather. Mutual interests are among the most powerful vehicles for social cohesion, which is a concept that is apparently every bit as foreign to him as a warm DM Albuquerque outlook.
  17. That was the first "biggie" that I remember vividly.
  18. That is one of the most underrated winters..one of my favorites. 93-94 gets all of the accolades because it was better for the densely populated CJ zone, but 92-93 had two immense signature events. And its not an IMBY thing because I wasn't anywhere close to a jack in either one.
  19. The el nino thing was a wild first guess from back in March, dude...not a forecast. Look at the title of the thread....."Winter Conjecture". That is all that opening sentiment was. I check out from weather every spring, so it was literally a wild guess before detaching from weather. I am about as transparent as can be with respect to my results...anyone here would tell you that. Its unfortunate that someone as talented as you seems to have such egregious internal demons/strife ....really no need to call me an idiot and attack me like that. I hope whatever perceived shortcomings you have in life are ultimately sorted out, so you can stop using your passion for weather to overcompensate for all of your insecurities and cease to project that venom onto others. Good luck with that-
  20. Man, it's a bloodbath when he gets going on one of his climate change tangents, though....goes into vivid detail like only he can about how there won't be any more hurricanes, it won't snow south of Mooseanus, ME, and everyone's crotch will melt off. Makes we wanna tie a firm knot some place really high and just "hang out"...
×
×
  • Create New...