Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    73,244

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    Probably my best bet at this point.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    Because there isn't a need to affix numbers at that range. I wouldn't put out an accumulation forecast period.
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea...obviously 40" wasn't happening, but this fraudulent hindsight that 15" or so was never realistic is nauseating.
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    Okay, A+, then.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    It was more than a single Euro run suggesting over a foot of snow and it was not in clown range.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    25.5". I need about 35".
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    I may even have a shot.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    I would honestly rather not
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    40" was viable, albeit veryunlikely. 20" was even more viable if the NAO wasn't misdiagnosed inside of 4 days. I'm sorry...calling weather enthusiasts expressing dissapointment over that missed opportunity "stupid "implies you are probably the one that needs a break.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    At least we systems to track...change in and of itself.
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    You aren't off of your game. We are trending hard away from PV interaction at day 3-4...that isn't reversing to a large extent.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    I haven't been paying much attention to that...Will said the EURO looks like a rainer.
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think that ship has sailed....the ceiling is probably about a foot.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    Hopefully one of those later events pan out because it would seriously blow to come out of this with one moderate event.
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    I wish we'd lose you and bring you back for the non existent ones.
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'll also had that the margin for error is less...meaning this is more likely to continue trending poorly than it is recapture some of that early potential. Even in a bad winter when CT is desperate for snow....that blows dead goats.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'm not sure why we feel the need to blast people for voicing the fact that 7-10" is dissappointing given this had the potential for so much more..."stupidity"? 'Cmon, dude...40" was a very long shot, but this had a very realistic chance to be a pretty high end ordeal and now it isn't. I'm not sure why storm enthusiasts need to pretend that doesn't blow while at the same time being glad that there is a bonafide event en route during a shitty season. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, IP transitioned to some moderate freezing rain last night while I was shoveling...pack is glazed.
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    Nah...its like 8" here. To me, that is pedestrian...didn't mean to give anyone the wrong idea. Nice storm.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    +4" 25.5"
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    I had 4".
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    I don't think so. The ceiling is certainly lowering, but I'd be pretty shocked if it isn't a widespread warning event.
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    I agree...I think the capture and crawl scenario has crawled away. We need to hope that wave can close off faster on it's own, which is possible.
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think it's becoming clear that the route to a big storm is to hope that wave can kind go to town in its own faster...that is the hope for a foot or more, otherwise it's a warning event...which is still no small feat this year.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    Looks like that PV energy is a no-go....about 36 hours off on the timing. That lead wave is all in its own, and looked better in a discrete sense, but the less interaction with the PV outweighed that so it was a net loss-pedestrian.
×
×
  • Create New...