Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    73,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. I had already told you that it captured later..what more did you need to know? lol
  2. No, they have less snow bc of the down slope on an easterly fetch. You should know that.
  3. I feel like generally speaking there is less resistance to cutters in December, than later in the year.
  4. It took a step east, and later w the capture...sound familiar? (Runs)
  5. Where the hell is that useless arctic load that everyone was raving about as an antecedent airmass? Back to the same Groundhog day, thermal crap, scenario that we had in Dec and Jan. All we heard about was how "no issues w baroclinicty or gradients now"....lo and behold....
  6. Now,. if the model is too warm....different issue. But it will most accurately convey what the data is trying to disseminate in relation to snowfall output IMO. If the model is wrong because it is too warm, then the output will be wrong.
  7. TBH, I only noticed those freezing layers recently....the snowfall maps are the best, IMO, for resolving thermal snowfall gradients. Like Steve and Kevin will tell you, it isn't perfect...but it isn't prone to those idotic glitches that add up snow at least excuse imaginable. It was also miss mid level deformation because...well, the model does.
  8. I agree....we may be starting to get locked into that, though, by this point....its been consistent. What causes that?
  9. Its been the most accurate to my recollection. Is the model too warm? Possible...
  10. Negative. The model is hopefully a bit warm in the low levels, though.
  11. H5 looks like it goes along the s coast to me....I have no issue with it.
  12. Hopefully we can get it closer to LI, beforehand, as opposed to the Delmarva.
×
×
  • Create New...