40/70 Benchmark

Yea, I didn't counter because I'm not invested in this next rainer, but I saw some claiming it should trend east due to the block. The block relents a bit, before regrouping due to the wavebreak resulting from that system. I pointed that out in my Monday blog. Luck, chaos, whatever you want to call it....having the block briefly loosen its grip at precisely the wrong time, and then not having the follow up system able to amplify bc of the wave spacing with the lead rainer is atmospheric chaos that it tough to predict, or attribute to the pattern.

Any type of forecast at 2-5 months lead is obscenely difficult....realistically speaking, obviously you want it to work out as speculated in terms of snowfall, but at the end of the day, all that can really be expected from that range to approximate the general pattern. The snowfall part is just too dependent on shortwave chaos.

I have always thought that we are in for a good stretch....nothing historic, but I would be pretty shocked if this season went on to be a ratter.

Of course, the rainer is the one that prevails....

I think that makes sense....last year once we hit like mid January, I just checked out because I knew what we were working with by that point. Its also tougher for me to do that now bc I have so much down time at work these days.....a month from now, I'll be able to dive into fantasy baseball mode. Defending a title isn't easy, and need prep time lol

I'm okay with him...its usually not at a busy time of day, and he's never malicious. But I get why patience is thin with that crap when its busier.

Regardless of what happens, you did a good job of identifying a relatively favorable period.....problem is that the vast majority of favorable periods don't work out.

Agree

All good.

I can't wait for it to snow, so we can stop bickering over dumb shit.

The warm node that is inducing the melt is propegating throughout the amex weenies....hit me last wknd, now Kev. Maybe you hate to see it, but I don't bc it's funny shit.

I mean the pattern that was modeled at the onset of the month has verified, not anyone's long range forecast. Everyone's outlook that I know of has missed some aspect of the pattern, agreed...I have missed the Pacific, so far. I'll just agree to disagree on the luck part....we have been through this before, and you have the right to your opinion.

Remember in Jan 2015...he swore up and down that all we would get that season was nickels and dimes....100" in 30 days later lol Someone found a couch with a shitload of change lol

Not even close......though snowfall isn't too far off, at the moment.

It was cold enough for snow if we got an event that tracked decently. We did not.

I hear you, and I am sick of potential, too....but the January pattern has verified as planned. This isn't last year where it vanished.

No....early Jan was always serviceable, but it didn't work out. Don't confuse that with the pattern not materializing bc it did...we just didn't get snow. The great pattern moved from maybe the 15th to the 20th, but no more than that.

Do you love his sexy ways?

Persistence until mid week next week is what we have all been saying all month, you clown lol One week from today is the 20th.

Hopefully a snowy cinema for once-

Yea, they are a system...all I was getting at was differentiating between this, and the S displaced block scenario that we had before.

Its both...one risk is suppression from the block-50/50 low...the other is compression between the se ridge and the -NAO attenuating the wave.

Man, that Jan 2011 HECS had a lot go right.

I know that, but its not like its block displaced to the south, as was the issue earlier this season. Literally speaking, its technically the 50/50 low..I guess you could move the NAO block even further north, but then you are risking a later transfer. Pattern is flawed, but it can work.

Yea, I will take the suppression risk because the alternative is a non-starter SWFE or even rainer...I get it.