Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

yearly snowfall data links


weatherwiz

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know the links to find yearly snowfall totals for the following locations;

BDL

BOS

BTV

ORH

PVD

PWM

I have the data but it's in a notebook at home and I'm not home (they need to be updated too) and I can't seem to find them on the newly designed NWS sites.

I gotcha for BTV...

Monthly snowfall since 1883 all in one table...

http://www.weather.gov/btv/historicalSnow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something seems odd.  

 

What I'm doing is writing up a little blog post about EL Nino b/c people I've talked too seem to be vastly confused about it and such.  One thing I'm doing is compiling a list of EL Nino winters and taking snowfall totals for those winters.  I will then break down Nino into strength and where it's based (west/east/basin wide).  

 

For BOS/BDL/BTV I got EL Nino winters coming p with right around average snowfall...but for ORH I got a good 7'' under their regular avg.  maybe I added something wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something seems odd.  

 

What I'm doing is writing up a little blog post about EL Nino b/c people I've talked too seem to be vastly confused about it and such.  One thing I'm doing is compiling a list of EL Nino winters and taking snowfall totals for those winters.  I will then break down Nino into strength and where it's based (west/east/basin wide).  

 

For BOS/BDL/BTV I got EL Nino winters coming p with right around average snowfall...but for ORH I got a good 7'' under their regular avg.  maybe I added something wrong 

Are you using snowfall data from those crappy 96-02 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they have a new link they keep totals on.  The page I found only goes up to the 2009-2010 winter

 

NWS page is incorrect for ORH snow totals between 1995-2004...there's actually a minor error on 2005-2006 too (66.2 is the real value vs 65.7 listed).

 

Correct values should be:

 

1995-1996: 132.9"

1996-1997: 87.5" (this one was correct)

1997-1998: 54.7"

1998-1999: 46.3"

1999-2000: 30.2"

2000-2001: 102.1"

2001-2002: 44.1"

2002-2003: 117.3"

2003-2004: 56.5"

2004-2005: 114.3" (this one was correct)

 

For more recent seasons:

 

2010-2011: 92.6"

2011-2012: 39.7"

2012-2013: 108.9"

2013-2014: 85.2"

2014-2015: 119.7"

 

 

BOS also has an error in the 2007-2008 season. The listed 51.2 should actually be 52.0 as they missed the 0.8" that fell on 12/31/07....thus their December 2007 total should be 27.7" and not 26.9".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you using snowfall data from those crappy 96-02 years?

 

More than likely I was

 

NWS page is incorrect for ORH snow totals between 1995-2004...there's actually a minor error on 2005-2006 too (66.2 is the real value vs 65.7 listed).

 

Correct values should be:

 

1995-1996: 132.9"

1996-1997: 87.5" (this one was correct)

1997-1998: 54.7"

1998-1999: 46.3"

1999-2000: 30.2"

2000-2001: 102.1"

2001-2002: 44.1"

2002-2003: 117.3"

2003-2004: 56.5"

2004-2005: 114.3" (this one was correct)

 

For more recent seasons:

 

2010-2011: 92.6"

2011-2012: 39.7"

2012-2013: 108.9"

2013-2014: 85.2"

2014-2015: 119.7"

 

 

BOS also has an error in the 2007-2008 season. The listed 51.2 should actually be 52.0 as they missed the 0.8" that fell on 12/31/07....thus their December 2007 total should be 27.7" and not 26.9".

 

Thanks Will!  I knew you would have the correct info!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotcha for BTV...

Monthly snowfall since 1883 all in one table...

http://www.weather.gov/btv/historicalSnow

 

Are you familiar with the BTV data set?  When I was home I grabbed my notebook and what is listed on the site is off from what I have written down.  Also, when I wrote down the data the previous linked went back to 1884-1885 but this set only goes to 1893.

 

I'm real confused :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I hate dealing with snow and snow data and all that crap.  I mean how hard is it to freaking get consistency with regards to totals.  This year's data is incorrect, that year's data is off.  Just get someone to spend a day or two or five or whatever it takes to just have a neat, organized and CORRECT list online.  Ridiculous 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...