Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. probably less confluence over SE Canada, which may allow for a bit more weakness in the heights, opening up an inland runner possibility. however, I think a suppressed solution due to a late phase / sheared energy is a much more likely way to fail here
  2. no problem! only goes to 144 so the SLPs aren't of much use, especially given the slightly slower solution
  3. EPS is much improved out west. less of a kicker, which leads to a deeper, farther W trough as a result
  4. EPS is much improved out west. less of a kicker, which leads to a deeper, farther W trough as a result
  5. EPS is much improved out west. less of a kicker, which leads to a deeper, farther W trough as a result
  6. NOT advocating for this kind of solution but it is kinda eerie how similar these are almost the exact same ridge/trough alignment
  7. might not have gotten it done this run, but this is much better really nice 00z suite. improvements all around
  8. should be a bit better, higher EC heights and more stream interaction
  9. GFS really looks improved NS more amped, SS not getting as trapped
  10. to put this into perspective, the OP GFS has the low much farther west than the farthest west GEFS member… which is already an outlier the vast majority of the tracks are near perfect, and it seems as if the real threat to this storm is a missed phase over the Rockies ala the ICON
×
×
  • Create New...