Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. EPS is much improved out west. less of a kicker, which leads to a deeper, farther W trough as a result
  2. EPS is much improved out west. less of a kicker, which leads to a deeper, farther W trough as a result
  3. EPS is much improved out west. less of a kicker, which leads to a deeper, farther W trough as a result
  4. NOT advocating for this kind of solution but it is kinda eerie how similar these are almost the exact same ridge/trough alignment
  5. might not have gotten it done this run, but this is much better really nice 00z suite. improvements all around
  6. should be a bit better, higher EC heights and more stream interaction
  7. GFS really looks improved NS more amped, SS not getting as trapped
  8. to put this into perspective, the OP GFS has the low much farther west than the farthest west GEFS member… which is already an outlier the vast majority of the tracks are near perfect, and it seems as if the real threat to this storm is a missed phase over the Rockies ala the ICON
  9. to put this into perspective, the OP GFS has the low much farther west than the farthest west GEFS member… which is already an outlier the vast majority of the tracks are near perfect, and it seems as if the real threat to this storm is a missed phase over the Rockies ala the ICON
  10. nah, the OP at the same lead time significantly raised heights over New England (look over NH/ME), which helped lead to the farther W track. interesting that the GEFS didn’t buy it whatsoever and actually moved the other way
×
×
  • Create New...