Jump to content

BoulderWX

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    632

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BoulderWX

  1. BoulderWX
    51 - low in proximity/heading towards OBX. Let’s see what next few frames bring
  2. BoulderWX
    Gfs Pregame @ 45
  3. BoulderWX
    Yup. Poconos and Catskills and Hudson Valley should see a nice 4-8 from this with areas up to 10-12” isolated. Just need to figure out what location to go to.
  4. BoulderWX
    No worries. It was another poster who seemed to dislike a post I made that was directly from the NWS. no biggie.
  5. BoulderWX
    Similar axis as all models but brutal cut off
  6. BoulderWX
    Also this FWIW…. Subject to change of course as new guidance rolls in..
  7. BoulderWX
    Weird flex but I don’t take it personally. They’re is a reason they have their degrees and were casual observers (most of us). But posting colorful maps gets more interest despite being wildly misleading. Everyone’s entitled to their own opinions, just not facts *shrug*
  8. BoulderWX
    Huh?
  9. BoulderWX
    This is hilarious and never will happen with marginal temps and all that but even half of this at 5:1 would be amazing for most. I think NWS is playing it smart with the WSW for morris county of 4-8: https://forecast.weather.gov/showsigwx.php?warnzone=NJZ008&warncounty=NJC027&firewxzone=NJZ008&local_place1=Morristown NJ&product1=Winter+Storm+Watch&lat=40.7979&lon=-74.4782
  10. BoulderWX
    Completely agree. People posting 10:1 verbatim when many locales will be half of that. And compacting. Just not realistic. I’d cut 10:1 in half if you’re within 50 miles of the coast. 8:1 seems reasonable well north and west IMO
  11. BoulderWX
    I’m in Morristown and right in the line. Either way ratios will be very low but would be nice to see flakes fly.
  12. BoulderWX
    This is hilarious and without any support. Also be careful with 10:1 as many have stated before, looking closer to 5/6:1 along coast and other marginal areas.
  13. BoulderWX
    Said this yesterday and one poster thought I was just being pessimistic. Have a place booked in the poconos but now thinking Catskills might be a better bet.
  14. BoulderWX
    I meant “not” very impressive. Fixed in previous post.
  15. BoulderWX
    Maybe a slushy mix. Doubt most places in NYC see more than a slushy inch or two.
  16. BoulderWX
    NAM long range - its not very impressive but at the end of its range
  17. BoulderWX
    Agree
  18. BoulderWX
    Yikes.
  19. BoulderWX
    “Gives it a goose” - best comment of the thread and great, easy to understand explanation.
  20. BoulderWX
    Improvement from 12Z. All I can take away from it. Ping pong continues.
  21. BoulderWX
    81 is pretty for the NYC folks
  22. BoulderWX
    At 69 it was. Next two frames looking promising.
  23. BoulderWX
    Through 69, GFS looks like a strung out mess edit: won’t let me upload image
  24. BoulderWX
    Just booked a place in the poconos just in case. Let’s go!!!
  25. BoulderWX
    GFS rolling… let’s see what kind of solution it spits out this time
×
×
  • Create New...