Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
  • Posts

    5,274
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. Relax pal, give it time. Yesterday was a dark day, we can start to see the light. Was it you that was hammered the other day or @clskinsfan
  2. Patience, they'll be here around noon. We know it'll be good, but I love the suspense of not exactly knowing how good it is yet.
  3. Tasty as hell too, eagerly all awaiting weatherbell maps as we speak.
  4. The Canadian has been performing relatively well too as of late, so I don't hate that run one bit.
  5. There are some good frames even for the western crew with some big time deform. Goalposts are moving anyways still
  6. The early hours are good as the low moves to our lat, but a huge deform hits us with a 976 off NYC.
  7. Great wraparound, thats gonna show 12+ up 95, can almost guarantee it.
  8. Boston is right on the R/S line, but gets destroyed. Closest to it usually does...
  9. There are a few differences in timing overall which makes some of the trough positionings look slightly east in later frames, but its actually the location of the storm. h5 @ hour 126, we can work with that. Further improvement from there would be a nice storm for most of our sub.
  10. It's still a good run, didn't really get any worse. With that look and evolution up top, I suspect we'd like the outcome if it kept up on this path. Definitely have come a long way since yesterday afternoon even.
  11. Definitely like where we're headed if theres a few more runs that continue on this path... h5 is relatively solid for some of our better outcomes of the past.
  12. Like what we're starting to see around 84 vs how the run started. Some upstream changes and vort strength doesn't look too bad.
  13. Second that, no reason to accept a forum divider if we don't have to. Lets all win.
  14. Wow, I had no idea that was earthlight. Used to love going to the NY thread to read his posts and model analysis.
  15. I will say, that's much nicer than anything I've seen to this point.
  16. @Rvarookie coming back from dinner to read the thread, it was nice seeing your posts disappear, and I suspect we won’t be seeing many new ones from you. Cheers buddy
  17. The storm will set a record for most tracked storm with fewest model runs that actually impact is significantly @Jitell these people how difficult it is to time a system like this in such a progressive flow.
  18. Certainly a lot better than 0z, just need the trough to take on more neutral/neg tilt easier. Energy is all phasing together pretty well in that evolution. Some stuff coming in on the backside to help tilt this. Assume a close miss, but a much cleaner evolution as well.
  19. That could, like you said, be either good or completely eliminate the potential altogether.
  20. No one said it was a replica of 18z but it did make a recovery. These things take 2 to 3 runs to fully recover if they ever do It woulda been nice if that additional piece of N/S energy that drops down at 138/144 would phase into the backside and help turn the axis more negative.
  21. You guys can't seriously look at h132 and think this is going to be a hit, can you? 138 looks similar in evolution and structure at h5 to 18z yesterday, but the juxtaposition is a decent bit east of that.
  22. I know why he's saying that, there's a zonal look to the flow when it gets out to h90, but it should be a recovery from priors.
  23. Forgiven, I was going to say it looked very similar to 6z through 60 when I had it that far out lol
  24. I'm going to have to watch this run come out after the topsy turvy model analysis we've seen the last few days. Ji will tell us its a disaster regardless. through what hour?
×
×
  • Create New...