Jump to content

DDweatherman

Members
  • Posts

    6,038
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DDweatherman

  1. I’d argue this run was better in that regard. It’s definitely something you’d need a “trend” towards, not gonna happen in 1 run…not at these leads
  2. You read em like happy Gilmore reads his putts. Gfs is hot ass this run, but 0z is when the trends start. “Fresh data”
  3. @TSSN+ is about as bad as Randy reading models coming out sometimes so there’s still hope here's to hoping Ralph put something in his drink
  4. He’s hibernating. Please try another user
  5. I don’t really expect any notable good trends if they’re gonna happen until 0z or after but let’s see what “happy” (subjective) hour has in store
  6. Honestly? Not that many noteworthy occasions lol. The storms it did are usually shit storms where we were expecting a middling level storm
  7. Not a lot of “knew” individuals in here these days.
  8. Can I ask you, if you’re thinking the Nam is onto something, and you’d be heartbroken if it was wrong…can I have some of that crack
  9. It’s usually wrong at 9 or 12 hours out so idk
  10. The key to this afternoon and tonight’s run is keeping it within reach if a trend ensued through tomorrow’s cycles
  11. I saw what amped said above about ridging upstream, but to be fair it was very flat relatively on the initial image. Not a huge trend there. id more attribute it to the more rounded tpv but a more positive/neutral tilt if anything. That and there being very little phase activity to YANK or TUG this N/W
  12. Yeah, scraff declined to be the creator. Who’s next in line???
  13. It’s crazy how miniscule downstream impacts can take somewhere from 0 to 12 in this. Models aren’t done moving
  14. That euro run sucked for a lot of the forum, but wasn’t far from something a lot different.
  15. Euro has big time totals on a sharp cutoff to much less. Something different about that run. I really expect a different solution on 18 or 0z runs, maybe vastly different than this mornings
  16. Me too, I don’t understand how the output ends up being that
  17. Why waste our time sharing what looks better when the outcome keeps ending up worse. Such bullshit how it ends up looking at the frames leading in
  18. Well, if @Scraff is here to start it now, he can. If not we’ll have to run euro through this thread
  19. Let’s start it now, who wants the honors? Try and turn this bitch around
  20. This is honestly what we’re likely gonna need to happen to salvage this thing
  21. Thanks for dropping in and you’re right, this storm hasn’t shown its full hand yet. Something will pop up we’re not looking at 1 for 1 on the current model progs. I love Mike Ross from suits too
×
×
  • Create New...