Want to see the gfs continue a great UL pass and coastal enhancement regardless of track for the WAA slug. Could save us northern folk if we do get screwed. High ratio backside stuff has been the savior before.
It doesn't hurt us as much because the northern edge isn't nearly as tight and the WAA slug isn't hitting the wall. The lobe of energy to the north edges in once the snow has crossed into our area from what the NAM shows. Also, the damn coastal had taken over and was kicking really nicely at h84.
You have to love the depiction as modeled. Great WAA slug that thumps the **** out of most of us, followed by a near perfect pass at h5. Let's keep those UL's closed off as it passes south of the area and the modeled CCB piece is not just fantasy.
For our silly list of isms here LOL. The sounding is so close on the NAM. I've always looked at for ML thermal layers, and with this being advection of GoM moisture and SW flow, if there were a tongue, there's a chance it would sniff that out.
I mean even if the Euro looked like the GFS track wise, the euro is substantially colder aloft. There's a decent bit of wiggle room I'd bet for anyone DC N
DC would do better if you had slightly worse thermals honestly. You aren't getting the really hefty slug of QPF driven into the area near the warmer sector. Rates are a big part of the fun of course.
Summary of the 12z suite
ICON - slightly south of 6z, 6"+ S PA to NoVA
GFS - carbon copy of 6z but wetter for jackpot zone, DC to M/D line
GGEM - Slightly south of 0z, 6"+ S PA to PWC.
RGEM - Slightly north of 6z, 6" line at the M/D and south
This looks south a fair bit of the last iteration if I'm being honest. I'm sure DC folk will like it.
https://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html