Jump to content

olafminesaw

Members
  • Posts

    3,805
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by olafminesaw

  1. Two days in a row, GSO hit 89. Still no 90 degree day. Saturday could be our last chance to hit the mark until around June 20th, which would be rather unusual.
  2. They need to work on their map legibility
  3. The hires models are showing a band setting up and training over one area somewhere in the Piedmont. Wherever it gets stuck is going to get pounded with at least 2-4" through tommorow morning. As of now concensus seems to put the bullseye somewhere in between the Triad and Triangle up to around Roanoke
  4. Might as well make a thread. Get your paddle.
  5. I'm surprised RAH hasn't issued a FFW yet. The NAM would bring storm totals to the 6-8" mark
  6. As of now it looks like Thusday morning is when the worst of it will hit for the Piedmont, at least in terms of flooding concerns
  7. Looking from the outside in at this possibly historic storm, I've never seen such a series of weenie runs from the NAM, in terms of low probability outcomes. Of course the NAM is probably wrong, but noon Saturday:
  8. Interesting how they cluster in a line from Texas to South Carolina
  9. It would seem a line of rain/snow showers could make it over the mountains tommorow midday/afternoon, and perhaps a second wave in the evening. Pretty good agreement from the hires models, but probably too warm for anything that does come through to stick. But I know how stingy the mountains are, so probably only light precip, if that.
  10. I think it's mainly driven by watching the NAM nail us run after run. Did a lot to raise expectations. The reality is this has looked like a 1-3" event with some upside potential since Tuesday morning
  11. Radar is starting to fill the dry slot (albeit slowly). I think we can definitely pull off 1-2", 3" if the costal component gets going early enough
  12. The wetter HRRR and RGEM have solid precip in the Triad by 12, while the NAM holds back for a few more hours. We shall see which is right, although nothing building on radar just yet
  13. Good tends on the HRRR in terms of QPF for N and W, FWIW
  14. Yeah, definitely seems to align with models trending towards less moisture pushing North. It should help us though if a good band does move through early on.
  15. Yeah, gotta wait for the coastal to take over to get decent rates unfortunately, but at that point it may be pulling away
  16. Radar starting to blossom nicely in central TN
  17. Yeah, the NAM twins are not really much different, does more to confirm 2-4" is quite attainable
  18. The HRRR is mostly useless outside 12 hrs. Even then it runs warm.
×
×
  • Create New...