Jump to content

GaWx

Members
  • Posts

    17,707
  • Joined

Posts posted by GaWx

  1. 52 minutes ago, NorthHillsWx said:

    The December 28 system has trended from the Canadian maritimes to the mid Atlantic due to blocking on the GFS over the last 4 runs. Definitely some volatility with unresolved strength of blocking over eastern Canada 

     Look at how much the EPS has cooled for the lows of Dec 30th in just 6 runs thanks to the pushback from the strengthening -NAO despite the Aleutian ridge not budging!
    It has cooled this much from the Friday 12Z run, an amazing amount for an ensemble mean over such a short period:

    - Roxboro, NC 12F from 38 to 26
    - Charlotte 14F from 40 to 26
    - CAE 14F from 43 to 29
    - SAV 15F from 48 to 33
    - ATL 18F from 45 to 27
    - Chattanooga 19F from 41 to 22
    - Nashville 19F from 42 to 23
    - Birmingham 20F from 47 to 27
    - Tupelo 19F from 48 to 29
    - Chicago 13F from 30 to 17
    - Tulsa 11F from 43 to 32

    12Z 12/19 EPS:

    IMG_6394.thumb.png.83b2c324d9bb4277f658254f58f9d238.png

     

    0Z 12/22 EPS:

    IMG_6391.thumb.png.bfd7d637e6a283748bef2472dafb479e.png

    • Like 4
  2. 1 hour ago, MJO812 said:

    Eps is now correcting with the blocking. Its hard to take these models seriously in the long range.

    Courtesy of another forum

    IMG_20251222_064149.gif

    This is a great GIF! Note that this major evolution of the EPS over this one week period of runs has occurred with the Aleutian ridge not budging but at the same time the -NAO gets stronger and forces the rise of the PNA/big colder E US change from the NE!

    EPS NAO for late month as of one week ago: ~-1

    IMG_6382.thumb.png.5f1d49e5cbd12cd7cc5c458a0bd42fad.png
     

    EPS NAO for late month as of today: ~-2.5

    IMG_6375.thumb.png.a63520e6fae0aeba50a584c440e02f35.png

    • Like 3
  3. 37 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

    Eps is now correcting with the blocking. Its hard to take these models seriously in the long range.

    Courtesy of another forum

    IMG_20251222_064149.gif


    Look at how much the PNA has risen for a week from now:

    From ~-2 as of 2 weeks out

    GEFS:

    IMG_6379.thumb.png.318241bc2b2ec73380e672a3e2841464.png

    EPS:

    IMG_6377.thumb.png.6a60bbe6eeb550faa09bb3c6820bfd4d.png


    To ~0 one week out:

    GEFS:

    IMG_6378.thumb.png.f452f01fe50c2fd4ff25aef68714feca.png


    EPS:

    IMG_6376.thumb.png.e560664e393b4207118ca65a8c8711b4.png

     

    • Like 1
  4.  New video this evening from BAMWx (see link below) (I haven’t watched it yet)(don’t know why it shows twice but couldn’t fix it)

    Summary from @bncho

    Here were my main takeaways from this video:

    1. Dec 29-31 will trend colder, like it has been for the past few days.
    2. He thinks there'll be a big storm favoring NE for the first week of January; his top analogs like 1996 and 2000
    3. Somewhere between the end of Dec and the start of Jan, he thinks that WWBs will happen, causing:
    - the death of La Nina 
    - -EPO by early Jan, but no +PNA
    - MJO to move very quickly and finally get unstuck thru phases 2, 3, 4, etc., finally getting back into 7 by around Jan 15 (just in time for prime climo)
    4. He likes the fact that the PV is on our side of the hemisphere, and he thinks it'll stay there
    5. The models are not seeing the cold in the long-range

    TL;DR: BAM WX believes that there will be a prolonged period of cold and stormy weather from Jan 15 to Feb 1. The first two weeks of January will likely offer shots of cold, but with relaxations in between.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5.  I continue to have a concern about certain WxBell maps being off. I’ve discussed the CFS being wacky and mainly too cold a number of times with@donsutherland1. But I also can’t figure out why their Euro Weekly (EW) maps are always colder than the ECMWF’s own EW maps! To me it just tells me that the WB EW maps are significantly too cold, period, which remains a concern. Why are they too cold? It’s definitely not due to climo base differences because if anything the in-house uses warmer climo (last 20 years), not colder, vs WB’s 1991-2020. Warmer climo means colder in-house anomaly maps, the opposite of reality! So, that makes the discrepancy even worse!

     Here’s examples from today’s EWs:

    1. For Jan 12-18th:

    ECMWF: AN ~80%, BN ~2% of US

    IMG_6361.thumb.webp.9a373fd301159877f611f422e84a156a.webp

     

    WxBell: why do they have…

    - AN in only ~1/3 of US vs 80% on in-house?

    - BN ~25% of US vs only 2% on in-house?

    IMG_6369.thumb.png.9d99ef15a2aa492926c1de31f84ce3e8.png

    ————-
    2. For Jan 19th-25th:

    ECMWF: AN ~50%, BN ~ 3% of US

    IMG_6362.thumb.webp.5bb58dd5097c23d29d084f7f67fab668.webp

     

    WxBell: why do they have…

    - AN in only ~15% of US vs 50% on in-house?

    - BN ~50% of US vs only 3% on in-house?

    IMG_6371.thumb.png.def20ba6df73acf0ba37109618dbe117.png

    • Like 1
  6. 11 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    January is going to be +PNA and the season will average -WPO....very strong statistical evidence. 

    The models are pretty unanimous on continuing the -WPO into Jan and the strongly -WPOs in Dec strongly support a -WPO as we know. We also know that the -ENSO -PNA stats since 1983-4 suggest good support for a +PNA Jan. But both the Euro Weeklies and extended GEFS continue to show a -PNA throughout Jan (see images below). Are you saying these models are totally wrong and will correct toward +PNA? If so, why do you think they’re going -PNA? Persistence? (even though I’ve seen the EW predict PNA changes and do well).

    IMG_6380.thumb.png.d6e8e5785b20c062b3ecde611eb6955e.png

     

    IMG_6368.png

    • Like 1
  7. 57 minutes ago, LakePaste25 said:

    Yeah and he even states this earlier. I’m not necessarily trying to call him out for being wrong but i’d like to know what has changed and is giving us a more canonical Nina. 

     

     
    Today, I asked Eric to address his earlier thoughts about Feb having good prospects to go against the grain of warm Niña Febs should La Niña fade early. He implied that, regardless,

    we’re not doing enough.

    I then asked him, “What do you mean that we’re not doing enough? How’s ENSO looking to you for Feb?”

     His answer:

    I would like to see a big and slow MJO event to go across the entire Warm Pool in January and I am not seeing that. 

    These Convectively Kelvin Waves are moving us towards El Nino of course, but the westerly wind bursts from them aren’t as strong or sustained as I’d like them to be to zonally advect the warm pool eastward more quickly. 

    Our only ticket out of this crap mid to late winter is to push the warm pool east enough to extend the pacific jet to a point where we get a +PNA/+TNH/+NAO pattern instead of a -PNA/+TNH/+NAO. That seems less likely to me than say a month or so ago given how the Warm Pool has behaved to this point

    @40/70 Benchmark

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • saywhat? 1
  8. 5 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    I don't understand why he feels as though the warm pool needs to shift to allow for +TNH??? We have had intervals of it in this regime previously both last year and in 2022 ...

    The data indicates that -WPO this severe in December is very likely to yield a -WPO in the seasonal mean moving forward, furthermore, we haven't had sn issue establishing -EPO ridges in this west warm pool regime.

     Looking at strong -WPO Decembers since 1950 verifies your statement for a -ENSO that’s in Dec and continues through JF per RONI.

     I count 10 strong -WPO Decembers during -ENSO winters. Here’s how the subsequent WPO ended up for JF averaged out:

    2013-14: -WPO

    2010-11: -WPO

    2005-6: +WPO

    1995-6: -WPO

    1983-4: neutral WPO

    1964-5: neutral WPO

    1962-3: -WPO

    1961-2: -WPO

    1956-7: -WPO

    1955-6: -WPO


     So, the tally for the JF avg is 7 -WPO, 2 neutral WPO, and 1 +WPO. So, these 10 strong -WPO Decembers during -ENSO decently favored -WPO for the average of JF fwiw. Both are favored to be -WPO but Jan is the most strongly favored for that.

     Out of these 10, 7 Jans had BN temps in the SE. The ones that didn’t were 1965 (NN), 2006 (AN), and 1957 (AN). But Feb leaned AN, which isn’t surprising with -ENSO.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. 21 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

    Yesterday's weeklies were the warmest and they corrected cooler again today. The weeklies past 2 weeks, if they are correct, are like the old "broken clock is right twice a day" saying.

    Indeed, the warmest Euro Weeklies run so far this season is still yesterday’s as todays is slightly less warm during several weeks in the E US overall. So, slightly better than yesterday but still ugly overall for cold lovers in the E US overall. It doesn’t look as good as two runs ago that were all NN to slightly BN throughout the E US 1/12-2/1. Todays for that period is mainly AN in most of the E US for that 3 week period. Consistent with that, today’s doesn’t show signs of a building +PNA in the means like the run from 2 days ago showed.

     A year ago at this time the EW were quite cold for much of Jan, which got me so excited and verified very well.

     As always when it’s warm, I’ll continue to hope it busts badly.

  10. 4 hours ago, gtg947h said:

    We're closing on a house just south of Atlanta Jan 2nd... I don't need that :(

    You can relax now. ;) The 12Z Euro has no storm, which was fully expected due to the 0Z coming out of nowhere in semi-fantasyland and with hardly any EPS support. But the 12Z does look solid cold as early as the PM of 12/29 and lasting through 12/31 fwiw. However, its E US trough is stronger than other 12Z ops and is thus currently an outlier for the cold. Regardless, the colder trend seems to be there. So, we’ll see. 
     

     Edit: The 12Z EPS has no support for a synoptic scale SE snowstorm as they support a mainly dry shot of cold.

  11. 4 hours ago, bluewave said:

    This has to be the most extreme -WPO +EPO dipole that we have seen in December. Lead to the unusually strong ridge out West with the -PNA for such a strong -WPO. Record Pacific Jet and historic flooding in the Pacific Northwest. 
     

    Strong December -WPO 500 mb composite more -EPO snd weaker Western U.S. ridge 

    IMG_5413.png.9783f7e9360f5d2f98144eb0cb6b5096.png

     Indeed, this combo has been a rarity in at least Dec. Looking at history for Dec, I looked to see the last time there was a strong -WPO dominating with a neutral or +EPO. It looks per the current December’s numbers that there will end up a strong -WPO while there will probably be a weak +EPO average (with the 3 +EPO periods averaging longer than the 3 -EPO periods).

     The last half month+ long period within Decs when there was anything similar was the first half of 1995 (extreme -WPO and weak +EPO), the first half of 1966 (very strong -EPO and neutral EPO), and Dec 7-23, 1956 (extreme -WPO and moderate +EPO).

     Over a shorter timeframe, Dec 1-10 of 2012 had a very strong -WPO while there was a moderate +EPO.

    • Like 1
  12. 56 minutes ago, gtg947h said:

    We're closing on a house just south of Atlanta Jan 2nd... I don't need that :(

     The roads from this highly unlikely 0Z Euro still in semi-fantasyland (mainly Dec 30th there) snow out of nowhere (and only one of the 50 EPS members (#30) has anything like this) would be fine by Jan 2nd per the same run. So, you’d just be left with beautiful scenery for your closing.

     If this were to somehow happen though, there’d be many very upset members NC/TN north. They’d be giving @suzookand @dsaura hard time! So, maybe it’s better it not happen lol. I don’t think they’ll need to worry about this occuring.

    • Haha 1
  13.  As I said, a year ago at this time the NOAA weeks 3-4 maps were quite cold looking (strongest cold signal in SE quadrant on record since this product started being issued) and they obviously verified quite well (although to be fair these aren’t actually forecasts):

    IMG_1104.thumb.gif.20496c9a01d944a80a8e103cacea8468.gif
     

    OTOH, 4 years ago at this time (when many E US posters’ tones on the wx boards were similarly gloomy) they were similarly mild looking to yesterday’s for much of the E US, which turned out to be “wrong”:

    IMG_6271.gif.4be754613d4c633c504122c82e9ed2da.gif

    • Like 1
  14. 3 hours ago, CAPE said:

    LOL

    Stupid to call them the weeklies anymore. They should be called the dailies. Or the Euro extended, which they really are when you look at an actual map(ECMWF Ext. Ens). They haven't been a weekly product for quite awhile.

    They’re still called Weeklies because that is based on their own extended maps being for one week at a time, not based on their release frequency. 

     Today’s Euro Weeklies run/extended EPS mean was the warmest run yet this season for the E US overall.

     Today’s extended GEFS doesn’t look much better for the E US its entire run if you prefer cold (like I do).

     But obviously I’m hopeful they will bust badly! A year ago at this time, they were cold for the E US and NOAA’s weeks 3-4 products were about the coldest on record for the SE US. I was posting a lot about those outlooks as well as the cold Weeklies and was very excited. What a difference a year makes!

     They often have a decent clue as to the general upcoming pattern. But not always. So, we’ll see.

  15. Today was another nice day for a walk here! Mid to low 60s, sunshine, a light breeze, and dewpoints in the 40s. Due largely to the great walking wx, I’ve taken walks every day since Nov 29th per my phone’s fitness ap. According to it over the last 10 years, I’ve never taken anywhere near that many days in a row of walks! Usually something (wx or other) gets in the way at least once a week.

    • Like 3
  16. 6 hours ago, tacoman25 said:

    Very persistent pattern. Something similar has happened before...1917 had an insanely warm and persistent pattern for the PNW/West. This one just looks a bit warmer and more persistent.

    Don't tell the residents of Juneau, Fairbanks, or Whitehorse that this is what future Decembers will look like. All three are on track for one of their coldest Decembers on record.

    And not surprisingly, Dec/Jan 1917-18 was (one of) the coldest in E US on record!

    • Like 1
  17. 13 minutes ago, BooneWX said:

    I’m thankful and glad we had the 3 week stretch we did, it was great. But I think it’s perfectly normal to be a tad annoyed we’re headed into prime climo on a warm streak. You’re right though, it is what it is and it can’t be changed. I’m a big 4 seasons guy. I get salty less about the snow part and more of the me having to break out the shorts Christmas morning :flood:

    The good news is that highest on any 12Z model for Christmas in your area is only 65-68 and some are cooler. These are quite a bit lower than the 74ish record highs. ATL, otoh, may be pretty close to its 75 record.

    • Like 2
  18. 23 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said:

    The warmth over Central US is very impressive, akin to the very warm Christmas we had here in December 2014 and December 2015. This is one of the few times where you would want a pacific jet extension to force storms into the west, which will roll the ridge through the east US and then maybe we can reset from there. But until that omega ridge subsides over Central US, CONUS is almost completely void of cold and snow. Horrendous

    Nationally, 12/25/25 is going to be close to the historically warm 12/25/21.

×
×
  • Create New...