Jump to content

GaWx

Members
  • Posts

    18,701
  • Joined

Posts posted by GaWx

  1. 9 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

    A +2.7°C RONI peak may be comparable to 1982 in relative ENSO strength, but a +3.3°C ONI peak would still be physically meaningful because it reflects the actual SST anomaly humans, ecosystems, and the atmosphere experience. ONI already uses a rolling 30-year climatology updated every five years. So why is RONI still ~0.6°C lower? Because the entire tropical ocean background is running absurdly warm even versus the recent baseline.

    I’ll give an extreme hypothetical case. Let’s say ONI were +3.3C and RONI were 0C because the tropical oceans were insanely warm. So, in other words, everything in and also around Nino 3.4 as well as the other tropical waters is insanely warm. Then wouldn’t that mean essentially no Nino SST pattern/no contrast vs surrounding waters existing to then lead to typical Nino atmospheric responses? That’s my understanding about the RONI idea.

  2. 11 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

     

     Actually, this post by Jeff B. is somewhat misleading imho as a monthly RONI peak of +2.7C wouldn’t be any stronger than 1982. Yes, an ONI monthly peak of +3.3C would by far be the strongest as he said. But RONI is more representative of the El Niño surge, itself, divorced from the CC contribution.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 21 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

    I do. 

     But what’s mysterious is that there have been numerous chilly winter maps posted for this and past winters with many significantly colder than this and without objection. Yes, this is colder than the prior month’s run, which was my main point, but it’s still NN in the E US. The coldest is only 0.5C BN, which is NN. Granted it’s 1981-2010 climo, but that’s still NN. So, it’s not even a cold map there!

  4. 15 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

    And if I dared to post a torch winter run in this dedicated ENSO thread you would be on me like white on rice

     Torch, cold, in between, or whatever winter runs have been an integral part of these annual threads for as long as I can remember. Without them, these ENSO titled threads would be much quieter. I’ve personally posted a good # of winter runs (often with caveats like “fwiw” due to model unreliability/biases) in every one of these threads whether mild, cold, or whatever without anyone including you ever having a problem with the posts. I don’t understand why you out of the blue made a big deal just after I posted the latest Cansips maps as a follow-up to raindance’s post. To me it was a perfect example of this:

     

    • Like 2
    • 100% 2
  5.  I ended up with ~2” yesterday evening from rain (no thunder) that lasted for hours with few breaks. The heaviest was during early evening as I posted about (~6-7:30PM). This 2” is my heaviest daily since 8/22/25, when I also had ~2” during the evening!

     That brings me to ~4.7” for May, ~1” above normal, with ~3.2” of this May 28-31. It’s easily my wettest month since August of ‘25.

  6. 14 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

    New Canadian run has a nice Summer for me - wet and cool, especially June/July. Monsoon very strong for Mexico and the SW US.

    Cold winter for the eastern US depicted, although Jan is pretty cold in most of the country. Gulf of Alaska low is kind of...south of the Gulf of Alaska.

     The new Cansips for DJF fwiw is along with the stronger Nino a bit colder than the prior run in the E US. I think it still has more correcting to do. Note by the way that these temp maps use the somewhat colder 1981-2010 climo:

    Old:

    IMG_0567.thumb.png.7a693cc2bebbf5bbb707522e5354fdc3.png


    New:

    IMG_0566.thumb.png.8c91c9b1e82d447dd3c243008d95392f.png
     

    It’s a bit wetter in the SE to Mid Atlantic and a bit drier in a good portion of the Midwest, OH Valley, and MidSouth:

    Old:

    IMG_0565.thumb.png.2e62d221dd726ebf7e2cfc8cff4f2653.png


    New:

    IMG_0564.thumb.png.40dacdb2b1e291e0725fba51243c223c.png

    • Like 2
  7. 1 hour ago, UnionCountyNCWX said:

    Saw several posts today calling for a super El Nino this summer. Which...haven't most of them been strong (or beyond strong) over the past few years, the ones we've had????

    1. 2023 Nino peaked at near moderate/strong border based on RONI. RONI (relative ONI), unlike the traditional straight ONI, takes into account the warming surrounding tropical waters from global warming. RONI has been on avg ~0.5C cooler than ONI in recent years. So, whereas 2023 ONI peaked at border super/strong ~+2.0C, RONI peaked at only ~+1.5C (not super).

    2. 2018-9 was weak Niño.

    3. 2015-6 was the last true super-Nino.

    4. 2014-5 was weak Nino.


    For those who aren’t aware of this,  ENSO is followed daily at this informative thread:

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  8.  Rain started here ~45 minutes ago and it has gotten heavy at times as boundaries collide over this area per radar. 
    This is a really nice rain that I’m thinking will approach or just exceed 1” and could go a good ways up from there if this continues awhile. There’s been no thunder/lightning associated with this.

     Update at 7:30PM: rain is still falling (going on 1.5 hours) and there have been additional heavy periods.
    As a result, I’m very likely near 2” at a minimum and counting! That makes this the best rain in months! My street drains are handling this well. In the past with a rain of this magnitude, it would typically flood. Thus I think the city digging the nearby ditches deeper is helping the flow into the drains!

    • Like 1
  9.  It only takes one TC to possibly be a bad year and unfortunately even some strong+ El Niño seasons (where we’re likely headed) have had bad hits on the CONUS. Keep in mind that just a TS hit or even just a TD can cause devastating freshwater floods if slow moving.

     I just looked at the 13 strong+ El Niño seasons.

    High impact storms in Conus during strong+ Nino (per RONI for 1950+)(2023 excluded since RONI peak only +1.49; so I didn’t count Idalia): I found 12

    July 1997: H Danny (extreme rains Mobile area)

    August 1991: H Bob (NC OB to E NE) though Nino not strong til later

    June 1972: H Agnes in FL due to tornadoes and in PA as TS due to extreme rains though Nino not strong til later

    Sept 1965: MH Betsy (one of New Orleans’ worst)

    June 1957: MH Audrey (near TX/LA border) although Nino not strong til later

    June 1902: TS storm #2 flooding rains TX although Nino not strong til later

    July 1896: H storm #1 Pensacola though Nino not strong til later

    Sept 1896: MH storm #4 NW FL and major damage well up into E US although not strong Nino til later

    August 1888: MH/H storm #3 S FL/New Orleans although Nino not strong til later

    Oct 1888: H storm #7 NW FL with TS winds up E coast to NE

    Sept 1877: H storm #2 entire US Gulf coast

    Oct 1877: MH storm #4 NW FL with TS/ET wind/rain damage well up E US
    ——————

    - Per best tracks, all TCGs of these 12 high impact storms were W of 50W with most W of 70W.

    -Only 5 of these 12 high impact Conus storms hit when Nino was already strong. So, early season could be the riskiest portion, which is pretty intuitive. Then again, MH Betsy (1965) and MH (storm #4) in 1877 hit when Nino already very strong. So, these are just good guidelines since nothing’s set in stone.

    -These 12 hit during 9 of the 13 seasons that were strong+ Nino seasons. So, only 2015, 1987, 1982, and 1930 of these 13 had no Conus high impact storm. So, whereas there’s legit hope the Conus will be largely unscathed with the upcoming very strong Nino, I unfortunately wouldn’t bet against one ruining things somewhere even if isn’t a MH as was the case 7 of the 12 times.

     Despite the above, the good news is that there’s a very good chance for a quieter than average season overall for the Conus. Thus, the chance of a multiple storm high impact year like 2024, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2008, 2005, 2004, 1999, 1998, 1996, and 1985 among others is lower than average despite 2 storms with high impact hits in 1896, 1888, and 1877.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  10. *This post specifically only addresses the CONUS*
    —————————
     
     It only takes one impact to possibly be a bad year and unfortunately even some strong+ El Niño seasons (where we’re likely headed) have had bad hits on the CONUS. Keep in mind that just a TS hit or even just a TD can cause devastating freshwater floods if slow moving.


     I just looked at the 13 strong+ El Niño seasons.

    High impact storms in Conus during strong+ Nino (per RONI for 1950+)(2023 excluded since RONI peak only +1.49; so I didn’t count Idalia): I found 12

    July 1997: H Danny (extreme rains Mobile area)

    August 1991: H Bob (NC OB to E NE) though Nino not strong til later

    June 1972: H Agnes in FL due to tornadoes and in PA as TS due to extreme rains though Nino not strong til later

    Sept 1965: MH Betsy (one of New Orleans’ worst)

    June 1957: MH Audrey (near TX/LA border) although Nino not strong til later

    June 1902: TS storm #2 flooding rains TX although Nino not strong til later

    July 1896: H storm #1 Pensacola though Nino not strong til later

    Sept 1896: MH storm #4 NW FL and major damage well up into E US although not strong Nino til later

    August 1888: MH/H storm #3 S FL/New Orleans although Nino not strong til later

    Oct 1888: H storm #7 NW FL with TS winds up E coast to NE

    Sept 1877: H storm #2 entire US Gulf coast

    Oct 1877: MH storm #4 NW FL with TS/ET wind/rain damage well up E US
    ——————

    - Per best tracks, all TCGs of these 12 high impact storms were W of 50W with most W of 70W.

    -Only 5 of these 12 high impact Conus storms hit when Nino was already strong. So, early season could be the riskiest portion, which is pretty intuitive. Then again, MH Betsy (1965) and MH (storm #4) in 1877 hit when Nino already very strong. So, these are just good guidelines since nothing’s set in stone.

    -These 12 hit during 9 of the 13 seasons that were strong+ Nino seasons. So, only 2015, 1987, 1982, and 1930 of these 13 had no Conus high impact storm. So, whereas there’s legit hope the Conus will be largely unscathed with the upcoming very strong Nino, I unfortunately wouldn’t bet against one ruining things somewhere even if isn’t a MH as was the case 7 of the 12 times.

     Despite the above, the good news is that there’s a very good chance for a quieter than average season overall for the Conus. Thus, the chance of a multiple storm high impact year like 2024, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2008, 2005, 2004, 1999, 1998, 1996, and 1985 among others is lower than average despite 2 storms with high impact hits in 1896, 1888, and 1877.

    • 100% 1
  11. 17 minutes ago, WX-PA said:

    97-98 the coast got shut out but inland didn't do that bad..we had a dusting of snow a few days after Christmas..it was warm like all Super Nino's are. 82-83 had a snow event in middle of December..65 degrees Chistmas day and a blizzard in February..15-6 had a blowtorch December..70 degrees Christmas day and a historic blizzard 4 weeks later..So yes it will be warm but there will be winter weather.

     I’ve noticed that there’s a significant number especially in the northern U.S. here and at other wx bbs who like cold only for snow chances and otherwise prefer mild in winter. They hate cold and dry, complain about it being “useless cold”, and prefer mild if it’s not going to snow. The good news with very strong El Niño winters is that there’s typically not as much cold, dry wx as in other winters. There will generally be a few significant to possibly major snowstorms but otherwise lots of mild for those folks to enjoy.

     I always prefer cold but I’m deep in the SE US and thus cold here isn’t typically that cold up north. If I were living up north, I’d probably have a different take on my desire for cold and would enjoy mild periods much more as mild up there is not nearly as warm as down here and too much and too severe cold would get tiring fast.

     

  12. I’ve gotten some rain from thunderstorms this evening with possibly more to come. It hasn’t been that much so far (<0.25” I think). I’ll get the totals in the morning.

    Edit: I’ve got yesterday’s rains near 0.20” (5/30) and only a T so far today (5/31 through 4:20PM). That gets me to ~2.7” MTD. Can I get to 3” by day’s end?

    • Like 1
  13. 22 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

    Legit Strong Nino going

     

    30 May 2026 1012.24 1014.15 -26.33 -13.17 -5.29
    29 May 2026 1011.31 1014.15 -33.46 -12.63 -4.77
    28 May 2026 1012.81 1014.30 -23.11

     

    Again, lowest 2-month SOI likely in 10 years. March's +7 really came back around. It had never been above +2.3 in March in a developing Strong+ Nino before, guess it didn't matter too much, except showing general SOI tendency to not really take off like SSTA, that has been present in the 2020s. 

     Based on the past after strong -SOI periods, 3.4 SSTs tend to start warming ~10-24 days after the start of these periods. The last 20 days have averaged way down at -18 (and it hasn’t yet shown it is ending soon). Thus I’m expecting 3.4 to resume good warming at almost anytime after the last 2 weeks of little change. Plus the models have strong warming resuming in June. Thus I expect 3.4 to be several 10ths warmer by a week from now.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  14. 2 hours ago, snowman19 said:

    And this is before the new WWB (which has just begun), ERW and subsequent DWKW has a chance to do their dirty work with strengthening this event further

     Today’s CFS has a record high RONI starting in JAS and going through NDJ before dropping at a record quick pace to only 3rd highest in DJF. I’m talking about records for each respective 3 month period, not overall.

     On monthly basis, it has records Jul-Dec! But then Jan falls so fast that it is then 0.5 cooler than ‘83 and is only 6th warmest behind ‘83, ‘92, ‘98, ‘58, and ,’16. Feb also is 6th warmest with it a whopping 0.63 cooler than ‘92! 

  15. 15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    This is why I feel we want a high RONI during an El Nino event....the RONI represents a spectrum, or continuum if you will, of the ability of warm ENSO to modulate the north Pacific versus the baseline trend that is more reflective of CC, which is cool ENSO like. I think folks obfuscate this with the MEI, which simply measures the intensity of the warm ENSO coupling. RONI is not so much about the intensity of the coupling, but the war waged between ENSO and competing hemispheric forces.

     Besides the MEI, I feel that the SOI (which may be part of the MEI…Is it?) remains a good measure of the phase and strength of ENSO because it is a calculation based on SLP differences between two points thousands of miles apart and thus doesn’t seem to be influenced by CC. In essence a relative SOI is likely not needed. Of course, because it is so volatile and subject to day to day randomness, it’s best looked at in 30+ day averages.

     Then again, if, say avg. Australian SLPs have been affected by CV differently from how Tahiti SLPs have been affected by CC, then even SOIs would need an adjustment.

    Other opinions?

    • Like 1
  16.  The op GFS stopped its fake early June typical tropical cyclone nonsense. However, the EPS runs (along with GEFS) are now hinting at a modest increase in TCG potential in the Gulf in mid June after the MJO has been in phase 8 for awhile per EPS/MJO fwiw. The non bc-GEFS stays in phase 7 though. Per Joe Bastardi, phase 8 is a bullish phase for Gulf TCG in June.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...