Jump to content

GaWx

Members
  • Posts

    17,626
  • Joined

Posts posted by GaWx

  1.  Today’s Euro Weeklies are similar to the prior ones through Jan 11th with mild for much of the country though the warmest is closer to the C US, well away from the E US.

     However, today’s weeks 4-5 continue yesterday’s cooling trend:

    1/12-18

    12/17 run:

    IMG_6242.thumb.webp.895a9e85022e7377439e7ff580eb78c3.webp


    12/19 run:

    IMG_6277.thumb.webp.e673852df5846e526580b4131dc73969.webp
     

    1/19-25

    12/18 run:

    IMG_6278.thumb.webp.8f44b24a5b8b370a392772093b8d6d0e.webp

    12/19 run:

    IMG_6279.thumb.webp.d40cc5e23feb599b3b6347cce5751b99.webp

     

    And then week 6 is similar to yesterday’s in the E US:

    IMG_6280.thumb.webp.ec0d507b5a1a941c59c47daaa87f4f59.webp


     In summary, whereas the first 3 weeks (through 1/11) remain mild in much of the E US, the last 3 weeks (1/12-2/1) are mainly NN to a little BN in most of the E US with nothing even resembling warmth.

     The 1/19-25 map suggests a +PNA is trying to form:

    IMG_6281.thumb.webp.608557e1a3839f56b06df3cd3a21ee84.webp

    • Like 2
  2.  The 12Z GFS has 6 days of the rest of Dec having a high of 70+ at KATL (12/24-29): 70, 73, 72, 70, 71, and 73. Granted, 2 of the 6 days on this barely make 70. So, getting 6 won’t be easy. Many models including earlier GFS runs don’t have 70+ on 12/29 with the 5 of 12/24-28 more common for the most.

     That being said, IF it were to actually occur, 6 days of 70+ at KATL within 12/20+ would obviously be a very impressive anomaly! How rare would that actually be? Extremely! It’s only occurred three times since 1878:

    -2021 (warmest 75)
    -2015 (warmest 77)
    -1984 (warmest 74)

     Needless to say, this will be very interesting to follow!

  3. The 12Z GFS has 6 days of the rest of Dec having a high of 70+ at KATL (12/24-29): 70, 73, 72, 70, 71, and 73. Granted, 2 of the 6 days on this barely make 70. So, getting 6 won’t be easy. Many models including earlier GFS runs don’t have 70+ on 12/29 with the 5 of 12/24-28 more common for the most.

     That being said, IF it were to actually occur, 6 days of 70+ at KATL within 12/20+ would obviously be a very impressive anomaly! How rare would that actually be? Extremely! It’s only occurred three times since 1878:

    -2021 (warmest 75)
    -2015 (warmest 77)
    -1984 (warmest 74)

     Needless to say, this will be very interesting to follow!

    • Like 2
  4.  As I just posted, this time a year ago had a much colder weeks 3-4 outlook than now. But I also said that a somewhat better comparison might be how it looked for Jan 2022 at this time, when instead of one of the coldest week 3-4 outlooks on record for the SE half of the US, it was suggesting a mild SE half of the US (including Mid-Atlantic) was a better possibility:

     A little after this point in Dec of 2021, when there was a similar very strong -PNA to what’s being forecasted for late Dec, the weeks 3-4 outlook was far different than it was in 2024:

    IMG_6271.gif.660db1ee861d2d12cd9a658ef58bb2e1.gif


     How did Jan 8-21, 2022 verify in Greensboro, NC? They ended up 4 BELOW normal and had two 1”+ snowfalls. So, one would have had no clue from NOAA even as late as Dec 24th that a cold Jan of 2022 in much of the E US was incoming.

  5. 57 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

    I have to agree with Eric Webb here. Despite what twitter is saying, this year looks absolutely nothing at all like last year at this time. It’s not even remotely close. The twitterologists either don’t have any semblance of a clue as to what they’re talking about or are straight up wishcasting if they think we are going right into the exact same pattern we had last winter by early January
     

     
    I agree that this is nothing like how Jan, 2025 was looking at this point in Dec of 2024, when the Euro Weeklies were much colder and this was the NOAA weeks 3-4 outlook, one of the coldest on record for the SE half of the US:

    IMG_1104.thumb.gif.3536f1843a55b0d22fba51b9331f3f86.gif

     

    AAM forecast had this then:
     

    image.thumb.png.46d9428b1ca06f3061e164821c61a454.png

     

    Current AAM forecast:

    IMG_6269.thumb.png.ed1e060eecbb752433d136d797d611aa.png

     

     A somewhat better comparison might be this time in Dec of 2021, when there was a similarly very strong -PNA, Christmas was looking very warm, and there were still no strong hints on the 2 week guidance that a huge change was on the way although some CFS runs were cold in part of Jan.

    • Like 3
  6. 26 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said:

    The projected cold weather between Christmas and new years is quickly slipping away. Hopefully we can get a pattern reset in early January akin to January 2024 because that shook things up quite a bit and prevented a January-March 2023 repeat with an eastern ridge. Something will have to give at some point, or that’s quite the headfake the models were throwing at us 

    Well, I just added something to my last post that may cheer you up. The models are actually suggesting a good chance this moved right back into 8 either yesterday or today! So, we might go right back to celebrating as early as tomorrow!

  7. On 12/17/2025 at 6:48 PM, GaWx said:

    Ladies and gentlemen, can I have your attention, please? The results are in and we did it. The MJO went back into phase 8 on Dec 15th, the coldest day of the season to date! Let the celebrations begin! The weenies are gonna party like it’s Feb 1899!

    IMG_6218.thumb.gif.3b2c1afafc1fb8eef0c4039a03fd3b42.gif
     

    IMG_6221.gif.1ab577e488ba13b5b17020bdcae3e354.gif

    Talk about a turnaround! After one day of glee and bigtime celebration due to our immense accomplishment of getting phase 8 back, it’s already gone. The MJO moved into phase 7 two days ago. Turn out the lights, the party’s over (well as of two days ago at least). :weep:
     

    IMG_6250.thumb.gif.1203078e286e85d193936b92c38c0909.gif
     

    IMG_6252.jpeg.b4fbdde44e0a601222271dcafefd4856.jpeg
     

    But the good news is that the models are suggesting a good chance this moved right back into 8 either yesterday or today! So, we might go right back to celebrating as early as tomorrow! :tomato:

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  8.  Todays Euro Weeklies are still not great by any means but they are a bit colder/less mild during 3 weeks of the 4 weeks starting with week 2:

    12/29-1/4 yesterday

    IMG_6240.thumb.webp.63538ddca486b118aa86d32c81f4cdf8.webp
     

    12/29-1/4 today

    IMG_6241.thumb.webp.ef899a31c66fd066f541e9c8f2e20edd.webp


    1/12-18 yesterday

    IMG_6242.thumb.webp.fd9aed492d744955c13778ed0052cbe1.webp

     

    1/12-18 today

    IMG_6243.thumb.webp.ce9266e0688f05812976b547bad346f5.webp
     

    1/5-11 was also a little colder today

    **Edited for corrections needed in my captioning because I had “today” and “yesterday” reversed. Today’s are less mild as I said.

    • Like 3
  9. 1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

    Very interesting archived forecast. Is this information publicly-accessible and, if so, do you have a link?

     I have it by luck on my phone as I happened to start saving a few in Dec of 2021 and Jan of 2022 I think because of long range hints on the CFS (of all models, which I also saved a bunch of…so kudos to the CFS then!) starting to show very long range big colder changes in late Dec and especially Jan. Since then, I happened to have saved a lot near and after the 2/16/2023 SSWE, which showed that the -NAO/-AO were initially way underdone/missed. Since then I’ve saved a bunch during the winters.

     I’m not aware of these being available to the public.

    • Like 1
  10.  On 12/26/21, when the PNA had been negative all month/way down at -1.8 that day and Baltimore (among others) had just had a miserably mild 68F Christmas high with very mild to continue through New Year’s, this (see image below) was the 12/26/21 GEFS two week PNA forecast, which went to 1/9/22: still down at -0.6 on 1/9/22 and no clearcut sign that 1/9/22 was going to be the start of a 38 day long +PNA as well as Jan ending up the snowiest month by far there since Jan of 2016 along with it being the coldest month since Jan of 2018:

    IMG_6234.png.3c4d07ad5aa3df6d45c46d655bc9a564.png

    @donsutherland1

    *Edit: The main points are:
    - The models can’t see out that far with notable skill and that includes forecasting the PNA/general patterns
    - -ENSO -PNA Decembers since 1984 all transitioned to +PNA Jans

    • Like 5
  11. 13 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

    00 and 97 I think also went pretty strong +PNA I think but can’t recall if they were negative in December or not.  I want to say they were not 

    -Actually, Dec of 1996, indeed, was still another -ENSO strong -PNA that transitioned to a +PNA in Jan after a 1.8+ rise.

    -Dec of 1999 had a neutral PNA. So, that isn’t in this group.

    *Corrected for typo…Dec of 1999

    • Like 1
  12. 1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

    While the AO and NAO are looking good on the latest GEFS, the PNA is not.

    image.png.0c70dc7f00409fc5c88afa332d2379e7.png


     I’m very curious to see what happens in Jan with the PNA based on -ENSO strong Dec -PNA analogs like 2021, 2013, 2010, 2008, and 1984 whose Jan PNA all rose 1.8++ from Dec. That’s still well beyond what models can see with any notable degree of skill. My GEFS PNA forecasting images for Dec 2021-Jan 2022 displayed that well.

    • Like 1
  13. 30 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

    In general, a PNA- pattern results in lighter snowfalls in the New York City area and northern Mid-Atlantic. The Boxing Day blizzard is a notable exception and the only KU snowstorm during December when the PNA was negative.

    Hey Don,

     This is somewhat related and something I happened to compile yesterday about big NC snowstorms during -PNAs. First, note that the -PNA for the 2010 storm was only weak (-0.3). Also, what’s interesting about the list below of big NC snows during a -PNA is that only one of the 7 most -PNA 6”+ storms there were during a -NAO! Anyone know why or is this likely just from randomness? It’s a somewhat decent sized sample of 7 and 4 of the 7 had a moderate to strong +NAO as opposed to just a weak +NAO:

    6”+ storms since 1950 at GSO and/or RDU: most negative PNA:

    -1.1: 2/12-13/2014 (moderate +NAO)
    -0.8: 1/22-24/1954 (moderate +NAO)
    -0.8: 3/2-3/1960 (neutral NAO)
    -0.7: 1/6-7/2017 (moderate +NAO)
    -0.5: 3/9/1960 (neutral NAO)
    -0.3: 12/26/2010 (moderate -NAO)
    -0.3: 2/24-26/2015 (strong +NAO)

    Daily PNA:



    Daily NAO:

     

     

    • Like 1
  14. 8 hours ago, WestCentrlVA said:

    Not saying it's right but the 0z euro run would make many happy if it actually happened. Long duration event for sure. 

    sn10_acc-imp.conus (1).png


     This Euro storm reminds me of another at 9-10 days out released on 1/12/25 that caused social media to get way out of control and even caused me to be texted in the middle of the night from an Atlanta friend due to his Facebook feed from this as if it were credible:

    IMG_6222.thumb.png.6c99f82d89290fefbfb0a176b6d4c157.png
     

     But this did turn out to be when the historic Gulf coast/deep SE winter storm occurred (1/21-22/2025).

    • Like 2
  15.  Natural gas closed up nearly 4%, easily its best day since Dec 5th. This is largely based on today’s forecast speculation that the forecasted dominant warmth may not be as widespread, intense, and/or long lasting in the E US as thought yesterday thanks largely to the newly forecasted strong -NAO.

    • Like 1
    • 100% 1
  16. These images show that the GEFS was too slow in showing the transition from the very strong -PNA of Dec 2021 to the strong +PNA of Jan of 2022:

     12/15/21 GEFS PNA forecast was ok
    image.thumb.png.d4145c4c6f44929a7f0c99a0806bf156.png
     

    But the 12/26/21 GEFS PNA forecast, which goes through 1/9/22, had all members 0 to -2 for then. The actual 1/9/22 ended up being +0.2. So, it was too slow in predicting the turn to a +PNA:

    image.thumb.png.d44987b0ba8bf50b197238da82539f5d.png
     

    12/31/21 GEFS PNA forecast out to 1/14/22: finally turned to +PNA but not positive enough as 1/14 was actually +0.7 vs this forecast for ~+0.4:

    image.thumb.png.31aa2abe477fb6c67990fdc4dd24bd26.png

     

    1/5/22 GEFS PNA forecast out to 1/19/22: not positive enough as 1/19 was actually +1.0 vs this forecast for only ~+0.1:

    image.thumb.png.2c5b0694b87746f664556bbb4e4bc5a7.png

     

    This shows the actuals for the entire Dec-Jan 2021-2:
    image.thumb.png.c8c920d34bf2947a0227ab5b341c1f25.png

    image.png

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  17.  Is NG finally bottoming? It’s currently up over 3%. If this were to hold, this would be the best day since Dec 5th, the day it peaked. There’s been only one other up day since then, Dec 9th, when it closed up 1/2% and then was followed by more big down days as the maps kept insisting on warmth dominating the US.

     Why do I think it’s up today? The AO and especially the NAO forecasts have gotten significantly more negative than yesterday’s more neutral forecasts as per my post three above this. A strong -NAO lead to much colder 0Z and 6Z GFS after Christmas fwiw. This kind of thing with the -NAO/-AO happened early this month. 

    • 100% 2
×
×
  • Create New...