Jump to content

Heisy

Members
  • Posts

    9,077
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Heisy

  1. 1 minute ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

    It will be a quick mover. These are one of our most common setups for snow around here. Wave forms along baroclinic wave left behind from this AM's departing system. Not saying it can't overachiever but in general thru the years I've seen these trailing waves drop a solid thump with the f gen banding then usually just lightly accumulating snow behind that also zips out quickly.

    These systems are textbook...minor warning event. The very high end is probably a 5-10" for whoever gets under the best lift and has ratios....which will be a challenge in and along I 95. Just figuring out the snow axis still seems the challenge moving forward. 

    I’d favor just SE of the city right now for the isolated 8-9” pops but that could change if this trend continues

  2. 18 minutes ago, adelphi_sky said:

    On Channel 5 News this morning they were saying 1 - 2 inches with a mix ending as rain this Sunday. I'm confused. They didn't even indicate that totals could be higher. 

    Because there is still a question of how Far East the storm forms etc. models keep trending better though

  3. I’d ignore the 12km and stick with the 3km, that being said it’s still a very good hit for a progressive system. If that fgen band forms as the NAM says someone inside the max axis would have a shot at 8” of heavy wet snow as it should promote heavy rates and good snow growth

  4. 5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    06z GFS tickled NW. interesting set of trends in the last 12 hours. Some models going SE and others coming NW.  

    Threat definitely still alive but need to narrow these goalposts. 

    Quite the difference between 3km NAM and 12km heh....before last event tony (rainshadow) posted the model that’s supposed to be replacing the NAM eventually. It did a decent job. I’ll see if he can post it later today for this event

  5. 27 minutes ago, WxMan1 said:

    06Z NAM Nest for Sat night-Sunday. Definitely juicy. This is with the Ferrier rime correction (capped at 10-1). If it's all snow w/o rimed flakes and a >10-1 SLR, we would get more. 

    The NAM Nest Ferrier snow maps did a pretty good job in the DC area for the WAA phase in the last event (on Sunday).

    Untitled.png

    Before the last event on our Philly forum Tony (rainshadow) posted the model that’s supposed to be replacing the NAM soon. I forget what it’s called, but it did an amazing job. I think it begins with a C but idk lol. I’ll see if I can get a snow map off its recent run.
     

    I found it...

    so supposedly this will be the model replacing the NAM. This was its forecast before the last event

    22868309-22A0-4B2E-B526-A8E525AA9447.gif

    • Like 3
  6. 10 minutes ago, WxMan1 said:

    06Z NAM Nest for Sat night-Sunday. Definitely juicy. This is with the Ferrier rime correction (capped at 10-1). If it's all snow w/o rimed flakes and a >10-1 SLR, we would get more. 

    The NAM Nest Ferrier snow maps did a pretty good job in the DC area for the WAA phase in the last event (on Sunday).

    Untitled.png

    What is the NAM nest? Like an ensemble of all the different resolutions?

    • Like 1
  7. 1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

    RGEM is yuck.  It has the next system right on its heels.  That is not helping.  It is way ahead of the progression on the NAM and GFS with that next wave and its way more amplified.  I think that is kicking this thing more on the rgem and cmc.  

    Was really hoping to nab the cmc/rgem tonight. It’s not an all hope is lost type thing but it’s a big red flag

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  8. 6 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

    The SREFS aren’t wetter. They may be better snowfall wise but the precip in our area is about the same and down in southeast Va they are drier. Also driernup the coast. Not what I wanted to see. I wanted wetter and more west basically. I’m looking at the 24 hour totals at 3 z Sunday night.

    Idk this looks better to me ?

    7A6FB611-0789-4EF2-A8CC-EB0EDCEFD84A.png

    • Like 1
  9. 10 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said:

    Idk man I think you would agree with this sentiment but the Euro hasn’t been itself as of late. Maybe I’m wrong or maybe there’s a compromise in between more amped models vs Euro/CMC combo but those developing winds at 250 just scream some awesome moisture transport so I think regardless we have some good advection and some good quality rates even if the storm is progressive in nature.

    When it comes to the LR the euro will always be #1 imo. Frankly it sniffs these out much faster than other models. At this range though it is susceptible to ticks in either direction. Seems odd but happens. This really feels like an event where we see an uptick on the euro once inside 48 hours. Idk, just has that setup 

  10. 26 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

    18z and 6z runs also incorporate updated data. It’s a myth that somehow they just run off previous 12z or 0z data. 

    I think that’s a half truth. From what I understand they use 6hr data from the previous run, and add some new data. I might be explaining this wrong but I had a convo with a met on phillywx. Regardless off runs are still updated and worth taking serious 

×
×
  • Create New...