Jump to content

87storms

Members
  • Posts

    7,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 87storms

  1. Yea, the term AI is loose…even ChatGPT is based off ml, but for forecast models the output is a forecast, not a snippet of Python.
  2. Yea, it’s pretty interesting. Been trying to better understand the math behind svn’s and neural networks. Understanding the loss function and gradient descent are key pieces, but it’s a thick topic, that’s for sure. Anyhow, heard it might snow in New Orleans lol
  3. Have had like 4 decent flurry/snow showers move thru this morning. I’ve noticed mby has had a few of those streamers roll off the Catoctin’s the last few years.
  4. I think the “ai” in this case is more about utilizing ml (data driven vs physics), not so much using ChatGPT to write code.
  5. The euro discussion I attended at ams mentioned ai as more of a hybrid solution, if memory holds (last week was a brain dump). I’d be curious to see how much overfitting would impact the models. Might result in more missed fluke events (just brainstorming).
  6. Can’t blame them lol. There’s gonna be some cool pics coming out of there, assuming the snow delivers.
  7. We might be getting too good at snow to avoid another week of tracking.
  8. You ain’t lying. Was just down there last week. The food was legit. Went to bourbon st one night…it’s like an adult boardwalk lol. I enjoyed Sazerac, though honestly thought beignets were a bit overrated. Pretty impressive turnout for AMS…heard they broke an attendance record.
  9. Aggressive flurry moving thru here rn
  10. Yea, in hindsight, it did dominate on the thermals, but it also showed a jackpot qpf along the fall line during the Sunday 0z run. Not sure if that’s actually what happened…seems like the qpf stripe was closer to Parr’s and the Catoctin’s, though up until 0z it was painting higher qpf there as well. Not sure why it changed it up near gametime, but it goes to show how important it is to understand each model’s bias.
  11. Yea, and I'm not even saying he should be let go. He's obviously built a machine there and isn't responsible for a dropped td, but LJ is on a meaty contract in his prime.
  12. Ravens GM will have Harbaugh decisions to make. You're not gonna want to be an owner paying a player ~250 mil and not make the SB. It's an unfortunate reality in sports.
  13. Tough loss for the Ravens, but also shows the importance of home field adv. Playing in Buffalo is no picnic.
  14. Missed a bunny right there.
  15. Entertaining finish. Ravens are making things very interesting.
  16. I always find it annoying when teams go for 2 when there's still plenty of time left. Now, if the Bills get a TD it's a two possession game.
  17. I only got a little more than you. I think the real screwjob was the fall line. Your analysis makes sense, though...seems like the boundary was a little further nw and maybe why some of those heavier bands along 95 shifted more towards 70.
  18. This low key helps my snowfall forecast...leaves me a little wiggle room lol.
  19. Reports of 3" in downtown Frederick and 4.6" up the street from me a couple miles. Makes sense. I probably got 3.5-4". This one kinda made up for the January 6 situation.
  20. Snowfall reports: https://www.weather.gov/lwx/pnsmap?type=snow
  21. Ok, got my snow fix (and probably posted too much lol...that's a wip). Time for some literal snow tv and football.
  22. Still getting lingering bands moving through here that change it from light to steady. Surprised by the snowfall totals closer to the fall line. Models definitely busted on that. Matches the totals I measured. Might have a "snowboard" 4" around here when all is said and done.
  23. Done with the walks for now. Nice storm given the temps leading in. A little less snow than I had hoped (3” as opposed to 5), but prob heavier rates at its peak than I expected. Grade: B+ (still lingering light snow around)
×
×
  • Create New...