Jump to content

SBUWX23

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    1,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SBUWX23

  1. You can see where there may be problems in CT, and any shift south that could reach LI too. It's a fine line. Never a fan of inverted troughs
  2. Yep, it was too dry with the last event too. I do believe the NAM was more on target and actually had the right idea overall as the even drew closer. I know there were some concerns that models were overdone qpf wife, but we had a good bit of rain out here and the NAM really handled the fact there was gonna be ZR well. Hopefully we can narrow down things on Thursday.
  3. doesnt mean its right. its not the gospel model when it comes to smaller details like what we are looking for with this event.
  4. The 12z NAM has about 0.3 liquid around the city. The nam is a bit noisy with the QPF owing likely to the localized banding potential with the inverted trough.
  5. that is some top notch analysis. It improved at 500 mb since 00z. There is a ceiling with this, but the 500 mb improvement could yield a bit more snow down the road.
  6. I will say though models almost never trend west or north. Wherever the gradient is now should verify. Models almost never miss these situations.
  7. At the same time it can also tighten the forcing gradient and where it is snowing under light returns its full of fluff.
  8. You live near an ocean that has a warm stream running near and off the coast. You have been spoiled over the last 10-15 years with big storms and KUs. They don't always work that way. Both of these systems are not classics by any stretch and of course they'll have some challenges.
  9. No significant change on the GFS. Been pretty consistent the last several cycles on a light but fluffy event for portions of the region mainly south of New England.
×
×
  • Create New...