bluewave

Yeah, LGA already set the new record for under 4” days this season currently at 1123 and NYC is getting close to their record. Number of Consecutive Days Snowfall < 4 for LAGUARDIA AIRPORT, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Period of record: 1940-01-01 to 2025-02-25 1 1123 2025-02-25 2 1051 1963-12-22 3 761 2020-12-15 4 746 1952-02-29 5 744 1981-03-04 6 743 1998-03-21 7 742 2013-02-07 8 715 1974-02-07 9 701 1977-01-13 10 690 1943-01-27 Number of Consecutive Days Snowfall < 4 for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Last value also occurred in one or more previous years. Period of record: 1869-01-01 to 2025-02-25 1 1394 1932-12-16 2 1123 2025-02-25 3 1063 1952-01-27 4 1051 1963-12-22 5 794 1956-03-15 6 743 1998-03-21 7 742 1920-02-03 8 687 1981-01-06 9 685 1974-01-08 10 680 1954-01-10

March and April snowfall has been way down during the 2020s. Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 0.1 T 0.1 2024 T 0.0 T 2023 0.1 0.0 0.1 2022 0.4 0.0 0.4 2021 T 0.0 T 2020 T T T Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 6.0 0.6 6.5 2019 10.4 0.0 10.4 2018 11.6 5.5 17.1 2017 9.7 0.0 9.7 2016 0.9 T 0.9 2015 18.6 0.0 18.6 2014 0.1 T 0.1 2013 7.3 0.0 7.3 2012 0.0 0.0 0.0 2011 1.0 T 1.0 2010 T 0.0 T Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 3.5 0.5 4.0 2009 8.3 T 8.3 2008 T 0.0 T 2007 6.0 T 6.0 2006 1.3 0.1 1.4 2005 6.9 0.0 6.9 2004 4.8 0.0 4.8 2003 3.5 4.0 7.5 2002 T T T 2001 3.8 0.0 3.8 2000 0.4 1.2 1.6 Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 5.7 0.1 5.8 1999 4.5 0.0 4.5 1998 5.0 0.0 5.0 1997 1.7 T 1.7 1996 13.2 0.7 13.9 1995 T T T 1994 8.1 0.0 8.1 1993 11.9 0.0 11.9 1992 9.4 T 9.4 1991 0.2 0.0 0.2 1990 3.1 0.6 3.7 Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 3.0 1.0 4.1 1989 2.5 0.0 2.5 1988 T 0.0 T 1987 1.9 0.0 1.9 1986 T T T 1985 0.2 T 0.2 1984 11.9 0.0 11.9 1983 T 0.8 0.8 1982 0.7 9.6 10.3 1981 8.6 0.0 8.6 1980 4.6 T 4.6 Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 2.3 0.1 2.4 1979 T T T 1978 6.8 T 6.8 1977 0.6 T 0.6 1976 4.4 T 4.4 1975 0.3 T 0.3 1974 3.2 0.3 3.5 1973 0.2 T 0.2 1972 2.3 T 2.3 1971 1.3 0.4 1.7 1970 4.0 T 4.0 Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 6.1 0.1 6.2 1969 5.6 0.0 5.6 1968 6.1 0.0 6.1 1967 17.4 T 17.4 1966 T 0.0 T 1965 2.8 1.2 4.0 1964 6.0 T 6.0 1963 2.8 T 2.8 1962 0.2 T 0.2 1961 1.2 T 1.2 1960 18.5 0.0 18.5 Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Mean 6.2 1.0 7.2 1959 6.7 0.6 7.3 1958 15.9 0.2 16.1 1957 2.6 2.5 5.1 1956 21.1 4.2 25.3 1955 3.6 0.0 3.6 1954 0.1 0.3 0.4 1953 0.9 T 0.9 1952 7.4 0.0 7.4 1951 2.7 0.0 2.7 1950 1.4 1.9 3.3

It will take Islip longer than NYC. Number of Consecutive Days Snowfall < 5 for ISLIP-LI MACARTHUR AP, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. 1 1503 1969-12-28 through 1974-02-07 2 1205 1989-11-24 through 1993-03-12 3 1123 2022-01-30 through 2025-02-25 4 1061 1984-03-29 through 1987-02-22 5 1000 2018-03-22 through 2020-12-15 6 758 1997-02-15 through 1999-03-14 7 744 1979-02-20 through 1981-03-04 8 742 2011-01-28 through 2013-02-07 9 689 1967-03-23 through 1969-02-08 10 655 1999-03-16 through 2000-12-29 Number of Consecutive Days Snowfall < 5 for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Period of record: 1869-01-01 to 2025-02-25 1 1394 1929-02-22 through 1932-12-16 2 1123 2022-01-30 through 2025-02-25 3 1063 1949-03-01 through 1952-01-27 4 1051 1961-02-05 through 1963-12-22 5 794 1954-01-12 through 1956-03-15 6 764 1996-02-17 through 1998-03-21 7 761 2018-11-16 through 2020-12-15 8 744 1979-02-20 through 1981-03-04 9 742 2011-01-28 through 2013-02-07 - 742 1918-01-23 through 1920-02-03

That big -5 AO drop was the main reason this didn’t turn into another +5 February with how strong the Southeast Ridge was.

If the data suggested that it was getting much colder over that period, then my guess is that you would have no problem believing it. Plus when you use terms like “no one can tell” it shows that you didn’t read the study. The issue is that you are viewing scientific information through a political filter which is warping your perception of reality.

It’s the speed of the warming which is unprecedented in the last 24,000 years. https://news.arizona.edu/news/global-temperatures-over-last-24000-years-show-todays-warming-unprecedented A University of Arizona-led effort to reconstruct Earth's climate since the last ice age, about 24,000 years ago, highlights the main drivers of climate change and how far out of bounds human activity has pushed the climate system. The study, published Wednesday in Nature, has three main findings: It verifies that the main drivers of climate change since the last ice age are rising greenhouse gas concentrations and the retreat of the ice sheets. It suggests a general warming trend over the last 10,000 years, settling a decade-long debate the paleoclimatology community about whether this period trended warmer or cooler. The magnitude and rate warming over the last 150 years far surpasses the magnitude and rate of changes over the last 24,000 years. "This reconstruction suggests that current temperatures are unprecedented in 24,000 years, and also suggests that the speed of human-caused global warming is faster than anything we've seen in that same time," said Jessica Tierney, a UArizona geosciencesassociate professor and co-author of the study.

Yeah, we had great storm tracks that winter. So we were able to have a snowy December even though it was the 10th warmest on record. Almost like an earlier version of 16-17 where it didn’t matter how warm it was since the benchmark track was locked in. Climatological Data for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY - December 1990 Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Sum 1540 1100 - - 686 0 5.58 7.2 - Average 49.7 35.5 42.6 3.5 - - - - 0.3 Normal 44.3 33.8 39.1 - 804 0 4.38 4.9 1990-12-01 53 36 44.5 1.3 20 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-02 57 42 49.5 6.6 15 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-03 53 38 45.5 2.9 19 0 1.21 0.0 0 1990-12-04 60 35 47.5 5.2 17 0 0.95 0.0 0 1990-12-05 36 32 34.0 -8.0 31 0 T T 0 1990-12-06 47 31 39.0 -2.7 26 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-07 47 37 42.0 0.6 23 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-08 49 38 43.5 2.4 21 0 T 0.0 0 1990-12-09 49 36 42.5 1.6 22 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-10 54 36 45.0 4.4 20 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-11 39 30 34.5 -5.8 30 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-12 51 35 43.0 3.0 22 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-13 60 41 50.5 10.8 14 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-14 41 30 35.5 -4.0 29 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-15 49 33 41.0 1.8 24 0 0.47 0.0 0 1990-12-16 48 40 44.0 5.1 21 0 0.26 0.0 0 1990-12-17 49 37 43.0 4.4 22 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-18 58 39 48.5 10.1 16 0 0.44 0.0 0 1990-12-19 52 39 45.5 7.4 19 0 T 0.0 0 1990-12-20 45 32 38.5 0.6 26 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-21 59 45 52.0 14.4 13 0 0.30 0.0 0 1990-12-22 61 58 59.5 22.1 5 0 T 0.0 0 1990-12-23 66 57 61.5 24.4 3 0 0.27 0.0 0 1990-12-24 63 29 46.0 9.1 19 0 0.44 0.0 0 1990-12-25 31 22 26.5 -10.2 38 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-26 36 25 30.5 -5.9 34 0 0.00 0.0 0 1990-12-27 28 21 24.5 -11.7 40 0 0.07 0.6 1 1990-12-28 36 24 30.0 -6.0 35 0 1.05 6.6 7 1990-12-29 43 35 39.0 3.2 26 0 T 0.0 1 1990-12-30 60 40 50.0 14.4 15 0 0.02 0.0 0 1990-12-31 60 27 43.5 8.1 21 0 0.10 0.0 0

Hopefully we can break the under 5” streak in the coming years so it doesn’t surpass the record. Number of Consecutive Days Snowfall < 5 for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Period of record: 1869-01-01 to 2025-02-25 1 1394 1932-12-16 2 1123 2025-02-25 3 1063 1952-01-27 4 1051 1963-12-22 5 794 1956-03-15 6 764 1998-03-21 7 761 2020-12-15 8 744 1981-03-04 9 742 2013-02-07 - 742 1920-02-03

Looks like the new version of the AIFS which just became operational yesterday scores a little better than the old version its replacing one and the regular OP.

The big warm up to end the month will allow several stations like EWR, JFK, and ISP to finish close to or even a little above average. EWR…-0.5° NYC….-2.7° LGA…..-1.8° HPN….-1.5° JFK……+1.5° BDR…..-1.4° ISP…….-0.1°

Back in the 1970s Long Beach was much more like Coney Island. With arcades and an amusement park for blocks along the boardwalk. Then they started to change the character of the city during the 1980s. Now there are condos selling for 4.5 million a few blocks from where all the old boardwalk attractions used to be. Several scenes in the Joan Jett video below were filmed at Chauncey’s and you can see the old amusement park.

While this chart only uses hourly readings, this was there first 100°rise in 5 days there. https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/plotting/auto/?_wait=no&q=169&network=NE_ASOS&zstation=VTN&v=tmpf&hours=126&month=all&dir=warm&how=exact&_r=t&dpi=100&_fmt=png

Yeah, we used to go to the old Chauncey’s Bar on Georgia Beach back in the 80s and 90s. The West End was a pretty wild place on Saturday nights in those days. It was like a college party town times 10.

Yeah, Long Beach is really a one of a kind place on Long Island. It’s the only city located on a barrier island. Great boardwalk and beach with a good restaurant scene. It really took them a while to bounce back after Sandy.

Montana is one of the few spots on the planet that got colder instead of warmer with the updated 91-20 climate normals compared to 81-10.

Montana has been consistently been getting the core of the cold in recent years. Even with the warm up last few days there are still at -20° for the month. This is their 4th top 10 coldest February since 2018. Time Series Summary for Great Falls Area, MT (ThreadEx) - Month of Feb Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. 1 1936 -5.2 0 2 2019 -0.2 0 3 2025 5.9 4 4 1922 9.0 0 5 1989 10.3 0 6 1899 11.0 0 7 2018 11.8 0 8 2021 12.4 0 9 1975 13.1 0 10 1978 14.4 0 Climatological Data for Great Falls Area, MT (ThreadEx) - February 2025 Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. Sum 366 -82 - - 1414 0 1.33 16.0 - Average 15.3 -3.4 5.9 -20.0 - - - - 5.1 Normal 36.7 15.2 25.9 - 937 0 0.51 8.7 2025-02-01 44 9 26.5 1.1 38 0 T T T 2025-02-02 10 -8 1.0 -24.4 64 0 0.02 0.7 T 2025-02-03 -3 -8 -5.5 -30.9 70 0 0.17 1.5 2 2025-02-04 -7 -9 -8.0 -33.4 73 0 0.20 2.4 2 2025-02-05 18 -11 3.5 -21.9 61 0 0.02 0.2 4 2025-02-06 11 -7 2.0 -23.4 63 0 T T 4 2025-02-07 6 -8 -1.0 -26.4 66 0 0.28 2.1 4 2025-02-08 23 -8 7.5 -17.9 57 0 T T 5 2025-02-09 13 -5 4.0 -21.4 61 0 0.06 1.8 7 2025-02-10 1 -29 -14.0 -39.5 79 0 0.04 0.7 5 2025-02-11 3 -25 -11.0 -36.5 76 0 T T 5 2025-02-12 8 -18 -5.0 -30.6 70 0 T 0.1 5 2025-02-13 19 0 9.5 -16.2 55 0 T T 5 2025-02-14 8 -2 3.0 -22.8 62 0 0.11 1.5 4 2025-02-15 3 -9 -3.0 -28.9 68 0 T T 5 2025-02-16 4 -4 0.0 -26.0 65 0 0.17 1.9 5 2025-02-17 -2 -6 -4.0 -30.1 69 0 0.25 2.9 8 2025-02-18 -6 -22 -14.0 -40.3 79 0 0.01 0.2 10 2025-02-19 -6 -29 -17.5 -43.9 82 0 0.00 0.0 10 2025-02-20 36 -9 13.5 -13.1 51 0 0.00 0.0 9 2025-02-21 39 20 29.5 2.7 35 0 0.00 0.0 8 2025-02-22 42 36 39.0 12.0 26 0 0.00 0.0 6 2025-02-23 49 35 42.0 14.8 23 0 0.00 0.0 4 2025-02-24 53 35 44.0 16.5 21 0 0.00 M M 2025-02-25 M M M M M M M M M 2025-02-26 M M M M M M M M M 2025-02-27 M M M M M M M M M 2025-02-28 M M M M M M M M M

This is why I wasn’t expecting the -AO to last very long when it dropped below -5 a few weeks ago. These rapid rises have become the new normal in recent years. Notice how many 7+ sigma jumps we have had in recent years. This one was a +8.193 rise from the 15th to the 24th for a new 7th highest. Pretty wild following the greatest October rise on record last October. 15Feb2025 -5.2570 0. 24Feb2025 2.9364 https://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/norm.daily.ao.index.b500101.current.ascii #1……+10.790……3-11-21 #2…...+9.401…….1-16-16 #3……+9.256……3-2-56 #4……+9.039……4-21-13 #5……+8.522……1-25-05 #6…...+8.462…..1-15-77 #7…….+8.268….3-16-68 #8…….+7.793….2-25-01 #9…….+7.731….3-23-86 #10……+7.720…2-4-11 #11……+7.641…..3-5-70 #12…..+7.502…..1-19-85 #13……+7.387….3-20-78 #14……+7.240….10-23-24 #15……+7117……1-23-52 #16…..+7.066…1-24-08 #17……+7.043…3-19-15 #18……+7.038…2-10-76

This is one long range forecast that we hope is incorrect. But would match what we have been seeing in recent years with the record SSTs and rapid hurricane intensifications near landfall. So it’s something to be aware of.

One of the more dramatic shifts from winter to spring for parts of the U.S.

Not as concerned about the total ACE for storms that can be OTS while RI has been on the increase for the all important landfalling systems.

Hopefully, we can get back to some semblance of a benchmark storm track in the coming years. It’s hard to believe that January 2022 was our last big snowstorm month. I don’t mind a warm winter as long as we get some decent events. This was the scene from my old hometown back in January 2022. Haven’t been back there in a few years but hear from some friends that it’s doing pretty well.

Some of the new research suggests that the downturn in the 1970s was mostly a result of increased sulfur emissions. So that the record SSTs in the Atlantic and other basins in recent years have gone against past cycles. As we have never seen SSTs as high in the Atlantic as the last few years. New shipping fuel emissions have cleaned up the air over the Atlantic and other basins. Plus the rapid warming of the WPAC east of Japan is a first for a -PDO. So with the rapid growth of marine heatwaves we may not be able to count on any type of sustained downturn like we did in the past. But it will be interesting to see what happens in the future as places like Florida may become uninsurable for anything but new construction which is up to code. The older inventory will increasingly become too expensive to insure. So we could be one or two big hurricane seasons away from even further difficulty for that market.

The excess salt runoff into the local waterways has been a big issue in recent years with the increased road salting. I have actually been on the roads where trucks were leaving a salty dust haze behind them. The local car wash business has been booming up here. https://planetforward.org/story/road-salt-contaminates-water/

Actually feels pretty good out there today. Getting some melt of the leftover snowpack. As usual, Central NJ is the warmest with some spots already into the mid 50s.

You are ahead of the game in Florida if you are in new hurricane code construction away from the immediate shoreline. Those folks with all the hurricane code roofs and windows can still get insurance but it has been going up even for them. Especially if you are in one of the zones which have missed the brunt of this recent active hurricane period. Part of the problem with the increasing weather extremes as the climate warms is that the population has moved into the highest risk areas. In the past like from the 20s to 50s, there really wasn’t as much population in harms way during that very active hurricane period. But the population has grown rapidly during recent decades. One of the biggest issues related to development is that the shoreline communities have been sinking due to subsidence and ground water pumping. This is on top of the fast sea level rise in places like South Florida since the 1990s. So these factors lead to that terrible collapse in Surfside several years ago. This had lead to condo assessment crisis on all condos over 30 years old. So many people have been forced to sell since the fees to bring the buildings up to code for the rising seas and sinking land near the shore are too high. So new construction away from the water is the best bet if you want to move to Florida now. Since the insurance companies will insure you due to new construction being up to code. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/florida-condo-owners-face-unretiring-112000881.html Yet another torrid tale has emerged of Florida homeowners being hit with eye-watering special assessment fees as building managers race to be in compliance with a new state law. This time, it’s the residents of SurfSide Club South in Ormond Beach crying foul after they were billed over $100,000 per condo owner. Per the new Florida law, all three-story-plus condo buildings and at least 30 years old must undergo a mandatory engineering assessment before Dec. 31, 2024. Condo associations must also shore up repair funding reserves. This law was introduced after the Surfside tragedy in 2021, in which 98 lives were lost when a 12-story condo collapsed. While few condo owners would argue against the need to make their buildings structurally sound, many at Surfside Club South are at a loss as to where they’ll find the money to fulfill these new obligations. “I’m a retired teacher, so we don’t have hundreds of thousands set aside somewhere that we can contribute,” resident Janet Stone told WKMG News 6 on June 26. “It put me in a position where I needed to return to work.” Many other condo owners are suffering a similar fate and feeling blindsided by the mega bills landing on their doorsteps. Here’s what’s going on. Addressing critical building issues After the Surfside incident, Senate Bill 4-D was rushed into law to require older condo buildings to perform inspections, address critical issues and build up their reserve funds for future repairs. The law, which applies to about two-thirds of condos in the Sunshine State, caught some condo associations off-guard. Many did not have adequate funds in their reserves to pay for the required engineering assessments and potential repairs — and as a result, that cost was passed on to the individual unit owners. But it doesn’t stop there. The condo associations are also required to beef up their reserves to meet their future maintenance needs, which is adding to condo owners’ fees — money they must pay on top of their mortgages, property taxes and home insurance — three other living costs that have climbed in recent years. Parks Huffstetler, a snowbird who bought a condo unit at SurfSide Club South in late 2021, told News 6 he had no idea about the upcoming assessment fees — and he certainly hadn’t budgeted for a six-figure bill. “It’s over $100,000 per owner,” Huffstetler said. “The hope is, once we get the restoration part done, then the units will be worth more and I can sell.” No option but to sell Some condo owners facing whopping special assessment fees may have no option but to sell their unit — especially retireeson fixed incomes, or younger Americans who used all their savings to buy their first home. If you can’t pay a special assessment fee, there may be consequences, depending on your contract with the condo association. This may include a fine or late fee — only adding to your financial burden. And in the most severe cases, they may elect to place a lien on your home or even foreclose on your property. Before letting things spiral out of control, you may want to negotiate with your association or set up a regular payment plan to reduce the immediate burden. It’s also worth speaking out if you have questions about your responsibility to pay or how the community is managing its funds because, as the situation in Florida has revealed, there are many struggling condo owners in the same boat. You may want to seek out legal advice or approach advocacy groups if you need help resolving issues with a condo association.