Jump to content

donsutherland1

Members
  • Posts

    22,981
  • Joined

Everything posted by donsutherland1

  1. 1/6-7/2024 Storm: The first snowflakes have reached the general Newark and Clifton areas. Some flurries should be spreading north and eastward across the Hudson River in the next hour or so. Belmar, NJ is reporting light rain. Wilmington, DE has switched to light rain. The colder ECMWF appears not to be verifying there, as little or no accumulation has occurred prior to the precipitation transition. Allentown is receiving light snow, but the observation shows "sky obscured." 1/9-10/2024 Storm: The model guidance remains very impressive with a general 2"-3" of precipitation with locally higher amounts, mild temperatures, and strong winds. River and coastal flooding, along with significant beach erosion, are likely from what should be a high-impact storm.
  2. Aside from the maps having 10:1 ratios (more likely to be 5:1 in and around the NYC Metro Area), it is falling short in upstream areas where precipitation has been falling. For example, Sterling (IAD) has gone over to light rain after little or no accumulation. Later data from Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia will provide greater insight as to how things are working e.g., the snowfall amounts on the southern and eastern fringes of the measurable snowfall might be too high.
  3. Latest EPS and NBE numbers: As the EPS is based on 10:1 ratios, those figures should probably be cut in half given the low ratio snow that is likely due to above freezing temperatures. For example, the high probability of 1" or more snowfall should be read as showing a high probability of measurable snowfall. Wet snow should fall for a time in NYC, but the opportunity for accumulation will likely be limited to periods where it falls moderately. My guess is that a slushy inch remains likely in Central Park.
  4. EPS and NBE information. Note: EPS data is based on 10:1 ratios. Actual ratios will be much lower given the above freezing temperatures during the storm. My guess is that Central Park will likely see a slushy inch of snow while lower Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, and Staten Island see a coating. There is still room for minor changes. I remain concerned about the combination of warm soundings and above freezing temperatures.
  5. The period of quiet weather is coming to an end. The region will be impacted by a series of storms over the next seven days. Tomorrow will be increasingly cloudy and cold. Snow and/or mixed precipitation will overspread the region during the afternoon into the evening. Precipitation will quickly become all rain along the coast. Precipitation will end on Sunday possibly as light snow or snow showers. The storm will likely bring a coating to Queens, Brooklyn, and Staten Island, a slushy inch to Central Park, and up to 2" in the Bronx. 3"-6" of snow will fall well north and west of New York City. Following the region's first winter storm, a severe storm could bring a heavy windswept rain to much of the region during the middle of next week. The potential exists for a 1"-3" rainfall with locally higher amounts, damaging winds, and possibly significant coastal flooding. Temperatures could surge toward or into the 50s. Late next week, a genuine Arctic air mass will likely begin pushing into the Pacific Northwest and Northern Plains. Severe cold is likely in the affected region. Afterward, this cold air could try to come eastward. The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was +0.8°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was +2.0°C for the week centered around December 27. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged +1.55°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged +2.00°C. A basinwide El Niño event is ongoing. The SOI was -6.59 today. The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was -0.595 today. Strong blocking in the final week of November, as occurred this year, has often been followed by frequent blocking in December and January. On January 3 the MJO was in Phase 2 at an amplitude of 2.301 (RMM). The January 2-adjusted amplitude was 2.276(RMM).
  6. Reminder: Avoid 10:1 Snow Maps. Go to the Soundings. Latest illustration: 12z GFS at 36 hours. The maps show moderate to heavy snow at JFK. The sounding supports rain. The column is above freezing until one reaches 925 mb. The surface temperature is 38°. Based on the soundings, JFK has little or no accumulation of snow rather than the amounts shown on the 10:1 maps. I highlighted the 0°C line for ease of viewing.
  7. Distribution of Daily Snowfall Amounts by Minimum Temperature with Total Precipitation of 0.50" or More and Measurable Snowfall: Distribution of Event Average Snow-to-Liquid Ratios: The mean event average snow-to-liquid ratio was 1.4 (standard deviation: 1.5). The lowest was near 0. The highest was 9.2. This data was taken from the combined climate records for Bridgeport, Islip, New York City, Newark, and Philadelphia. At present, it appears that Central Park's low temperature during the precipitation will likely be 34° or above. NAM and GFS MOS: 34°. NBE: 36° +/- 3°. This historic data also argues for a low ratio and light accumulation of snow for New York City.
  8. National Blend of Models Output (0z and 12z cycles): The 1/5 14z run decreased a little more to 0.5". It shows a minimum temperature of 36° during the precipitation. Any snow that falls in the NYC area will be low- to very low-ratio snow.
  9. Those maps are a huge problem. I've increasingly starting calling out and verifying the extreme maps posted on Twitter. Those posts provide no useful guidance and only serve to undermine professional credibility of meteorologists, many of whom are outstanding, but whose insights and forecasts are drowned out by the noise of the extreme posts, blind rush to be first to make a call, etc. Indeed, a female TV meteorologist from Philadelphia was criticized on social media for not making an early call for snowfall amounts when uncertainty was high. She made a forecast for a coating to an inch in Philadelphia yesterday (her first call). That looks good. Contrast that to the social media maps showing 4"-8" or even 4"-12" in Philadelphia that dated as far back as January 1. Quite bluntly, those who consistently post extreme solutions or earliest calls but wind up wrong over and over again lack skill. They can spin it any way they like, but skill is a function of consistent accuracy. Nothing more. Unfortunately, the public and those who read social media don't realize the absence of skill among those who take sensationalist stands. Thus, the misleading perception that meteorologists 'can't forecast' prevails even as those perceptions are far off the mark.
×
×
  • Create New...