Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    71,161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by weatherwiz

  1. There is a purpose to this thread...want to start collecting information, thoughts, and ideas for bigger events which can be a tool for research purposes down the road. 

     

    An extremely unseasonably conducive environment for severe weather (including tornadoes and strong tornadoes) exists across the Gulf coast states. A somewhat uncommon winter-time elevated-mixed layer has advected into the region from the Mexican plateau and is characterized by mlvl lapse rates on order of ~7.5 C/KM. Below the EML exists an extremely moist airmass with sfc dews in the 60's and 70's. This is contributing to MLCAPE values on order of 1500 J/KG with 3km CAPE values greater than 125 J/KG. Couple with with 50+ knots of vertical shear and effective helicity > 300 m2s2 and this is the result...

    image.thumb.png.ee9bee1859051528b51d041b781382cc.png

     

    A large and destructive tornado is currently on the ground over Leander, LA. This has been a long-tracked tornado and given the environment may be on the ground for quite a while. 

     

  2. Just now, Go Kart Mozart said:

    FOUS shows the surface winds starting at 60 degrees, and backing to 40 through the event.  I don't think the Sound is a big deal here.

    It's always tough...even when you think the sound will be of zero influence it still seems to be a factor lol. 

    What I think happens is there is still enough of a gradient between land/ocean that you still generate at least a localized and very confined area of winds with a southerly/easterly component...it's just so localized and small models won't pick it up. 

  3. Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said:

    Its a fraud 5 member. 

    I was on board the last one as something different than analfrontal ....your not getting me on the arctic front train 

    These type of fronts almost always are associated with snow squalls. these are different than polar fronts which are more common. 

  4. 2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

    You and Dr Dews should shack up in the Mehiday Inn

    Wednesday looks fun. Wish we had some steeper lapse rates involved b/c I would throw the lightning flags around. 

    Speaking of lightning...I hope they do some special balloon launches in the south today!!!

  5. 3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    Yeah it's possible half an inch happens, I'm just pretty skeptical of it. Nothing wrong with using it as the upper bound though...upper bound should be where if most things go right.

    All these things to consider:

    - QPF could be overdone in general on some of these mesos

    - Lose some ZR QPF to sleet where algorithms are too quick to flip to ZR

    - Accretion efficiency? It can vary quite a bit depending on precip rate, temps, wind, etc...but median is about 0.70.

     

     

    As an aside, I actually always thought the ice storm warning criteria of half an inch of ice was kind of dumb and arbitrary anyway. Grid problems start ramping up quickly at around a third to 3/8 of an inch I've noticed.

    I agree...also 1/2'' of ice isn't very easy to get. We def start getting problems with less...especially if there is accumulating snow involved just prior. 

  6. 22 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

    Going big with the ice i see. I am likely bumping up the .1-.3 range to .25-.50, our zones are the same though. My biggest problem though is forecasting the shore, you think they dont see any ice accumulation at all? I dont think itll be as big as inland areas but still have up to a tenth or so..

    The immediate shoreline is tough...with it still being early in the season it doesn't take much of a easterly component to the wind to bump sfc temps just above freezing. I think they may see some...but probably generally under .10''. 

  7. Just now, JGNYK03 said:

    Ya ground zero seems to be from merritt parkway to 84.  North of there more sleet, south of there maybe just above freezing.  Every single piece of guidance agrees on this. 

    I think you may have mentioned that could be the focal zone the other day...pretty solid call. Now it's just a matter of how much ZR we're talking about. 

  8. Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

    Let’s not forget how dumb folks are thinking it’s rain when it’s zr so they drive like they normally do.

    I love the famous "I have 4-wheel drive I'll be fine" line (it's ice not snow...unless your tires have custom made ice skates...good luck)

  9. Just now, WxWatcher007 said:

    Me too, but I think an upper end of 5” works here because pingers are never as far behind as one thinks down here. I’m hesitant to pull the trigger on a big icing forecast but I think it’s a legit mess.

    I typically bump up the expected changeover by an hour or two from what models indicate. Yeah I'm not sure if this will be a big icing event...but we may straddle the line between issues and a bit more in the way of major issues (major issues being scattered power outages and some tree damage) 

    • Like 1
  10. Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

    The 4 northern counties as usual, agree. The ice is the bigger story. 

    With this...that makes the snowfall forecast just as important. If we get 3-4'' of snow followed by ice it will further enhance potential for some bigger issues. 

  11. 1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

    I could see a 4-6” swap across CCT before the ip/zr fest. 

    That's certainly in my mind...though I am going to place that closer to the border...mlvls always seem to warm rather quick. I am a little concerned b/c if we see ice accretion pushing .4'' that's sticking the head right into the start of some trouble territory. 

  12. I don't like how the NAM only has central/northern CT only in the upper 20's to around 30 for much of tomorrow. 

    Also props to @JGNYK03 for pointing out the discrepancy with my initial ice forecast map from Saturday...definitely going to be a much larger (and more uniform) even close down to the coast. Going to correct that with an update later this morning...along with adding a 4-6'' stripe along the CT/MA border. 

     

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...