BillT

amazing....the climate always changes, it is a set of statistics used to describe the past weather and used to predicts what is the normal conditions now......those statistics constantly change so their output will also constantly change.......to claim we humans CAUSE these climate changes indeed is NOT science and is rather NON thinking on any level.......mock me all you desire but i post truth in laymans terms........the weather constantly changes and i assure YOU we humans are NOT the cause of constantly changing weather.

spot on yes averages can be taken out that many places but that is NOT what i am discussing, my POINT is the ACCURACY of those averages is nothing close to the precision needed to claim accuracy to within hundredths of a degree..... in summary yes you can average many number out to many decimals places but that is NO WAY means the final result is an accurate scientific reading.

you example above gives an average NOT a meaningful single average for that area.......nowhere in that area likely was 50.001, so that number in reality has no useful info or meaning

plus or minus .1 degreeC does NOT give one accuracy to within hundredths of a degree.

The issue doesn’t mean measuring sea ice extent or area is not science. The issue concerns limitations of satellite-based measurements and the concept of margins of error. Statistically, when error is considered, measurements within 40,000 km2 are treated as being the same.<<< TY so now we have a large margin of error when taking a picture and measuring it, YET your side still claims to have precision in a single global temperature to within hundredths of a degree.....and no mention of any margin of error in those claims. bottom line = the claims we humans are the cause of climate change is IDIOCY and not one shred of science backs that claim.

>>>>Values within 40,000 square kilometers (15,000 square miles) are considered tied.<<< new rules for sports = in baseball scores within 2 runs are considered tied, in football scores with differential of less than 7 are considered tied, in bowling scored less than 10 pins different are considered tied...... in laymans terms this ice measuring stuff is NOT SCIENCE, the results are what we declare them to be NOT the actual results.

"Our CO2 emissions will remain in the atmosphere for centuries to millennia, maintaining the warmer temperatures long after these emissions were released." the TRUTH = some of that co2 gets removed daily by the plants using it as FOOD........ "Human activities have caused a 1.0°C rise in the global temperature over the past 150 years." TRUTH = the earth has warmed that much since coming out of the little ice age, YOU nor anybody else has any evidence that humans are the "cause" of this happening.......

the above post is a vicious attack on an honest person.........Iceland IS a highly active volcano area, to claim there is nothing to support the claim some heat could be coming from under OK is just a LIE.

note i make no personal remarks about any poster.......how was my factual post silly please?.......the measurement used in is hundredths of a degree and our precision in gathering the data is nowhere near that exact.......the above graph shows warming when coming out of a colder period, how is that unusual please?

the ranking of warmest is based on hundredths of a degree a precision we do not have the ability yet to find.

this particular warming event? it was warmer in 1998 than now, there is NO ongoing warming at this time.........

dons i made no mention of you.......they made that rather silly claim and now you posted this "(relatively stable since the 1960s with some fluctuations)." that clearly says there have been fluctuations since the 60's = NOT a constant rate of incoming from the sun.......to rule out the SUN and blame human released co2 for the warming remains INSANE.......

One of the “smoking guns” that tells us the Sun is not causing global warming ..........that clearly says the SUN does NOT cause warming on earth........ they said 55% of records were broken which means 45% were NOT broken and it was warmer in the past......the climate is the PAST weather stats averaged, it is NOT a force, has no power and does NOT cause any weather event.

to claim the SUN does NOT cause global warming is utterly insane........

it seems as if many here WANT catastrophic warming......hoping the ice melts

quick english lesson = concerning is NOT a noun it is a preposition but many use it wrongly as a noun today....also worrying is a verb NOT a noun,

why do some people hope severe weather happens? 10+ people died this afternoon in bama

lol the psyche ward has had 3 or more big storms in the next week down to warm rain and thunderstorms now......every new model runs changes everything there

please remember the psyche ward in your prayers tonight, they are in total meltdown

i only get to post for myself never claimed to be speaking for anybody else......and i do enjoy watching the storm as it begins and evolves....the outcome for my back yard is irrelevant

fun times underway, the actual storm is in view and can be watched as it moves towards the SE..........

the reason why snowmageddon happened in b'ham and atlanta is simple folks we had close to 50 hours below freezing before the moisture arrived so every flake of snow that fell stuck on the roads......one inch of snow on frozen already roads is very bad, while 4 inches falling onto warm roads just melts.......

same people break the same rules year after year and very few actually discuss the weather......

did any model have snow tonight in western virginnia? seeing pictures from poung va. snow covered highway

a low is nearing the baja area throwing moisture north and east reaching almost to oklahoma and cold air is dropping south north of there